本研究從修復式正義的觀點，探討緩起訴處分對受處分者是否具有修復式正義精神之實踐效益，並試圖找出促使緩起訴制度達到最大實踐效益之模型。研究方法一方面運用焦點團體法，透過與檢察官、觀護人的座談會取得執行者適用緩起訴制度的態度;另一方面運用問卷訪談法對於受處分者進行施測。研究樣本來自於4個地方法院檢察署，有效問卷共計220份。經獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、與逐步迴歸分析等統計方法進行分析，所得結果如下: 一、 具修復式正義精神之緩起訴制度，其實踐效果包括:程序滿意度、結果滿意度、恥感重建及修復程度等均得正面之回應。 二、 緩起訴處分者個人特性中，僅有年薪所得與程序滿意度間有顯著差異;犯罪事件特性與緩起訴制度之實踐效果間皆無顯著差異。 三、 緩起訴處分者經歷的程序要件中之主觀程序的差異，對於緩起訴制度帶來之實踐效益會有效影響。 四、 加害者與被害者間若有充分的對話與協商機會，則緩起訴制度的實踐效果會更加顯著，且加害者對於被害者的看法大多持正面的感受。 五、 在相關分析及逐步線性迴歸分析中，發現對於受處分者在緩起訴制度中所感受到的實踐效果，主要圍繞在主觀程序要件上。 從研究中可以發現緩起訴制度帶來的修復式正義實踐效益多繫於程序要件上，亦即檢察官在整體緩起訴制度中表現的態度，包括:良好問案態度、認真詳盡的問案、公正的問案立場、給予受緩起訴處分者充分的陳述、閱覽筆錄、重新做人、對處分內容表示意見的機會等。因此，創造一個具有良好情緒智慧的刑事司法環境，擺脫以往傳統司法人員給人威嚴、凶悍的印象，以更關懷、關心的態度對待犯罪人，增加犯罪人改過自新的力量與意願。如此具修復式正義精神之緩起訴制度將更能為社會創建更多更好的「和平及福祉」。

Based on the theory of restorative justice, this study intends to investigate casual factors of restoration for those offenders who received suspended prosecution from local prosecutorial offices. It first used focused group interview method to interview prosecutors and probationer officers to collect information on their attitudes toward suspended prosecution. It also used questionnaire survey to collect information from 220 offenders who received suspended prosecution from 4 prosecutorial offices. The study then used independent sample t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation and stepwise regression to analyze data. The results show: 1. From the perspective of restorative justice theory, the implementation results of suspended prosecution are all positively responded by the offenders, these include: procedural satisfaction, result satisfaction, shame rebuilding and degree of restoration. 2. Among offender demographic variables, only yearly income has significant impact on procedural satisfaction; offense characteristics are not significant correlated with implementation results. 3. The offender’s procedural experience of suspended prosecution have significant impact on the degree of restoration. 4. The implementation benefits become more significant if there are dialogues between offenders and victims. 5. Correlation analysis and regression analysis show that the main factors influencing offender restoration are the subjective procedure of suspended prosecution that the offender experienced. This research discovered that factors influencing offender’s restoration are mainly surrounded on the prosecutors’ factors: good attitude to conduct interrogation, fairness and diligence, allowing the offenders to express their opinions, encourage the offenders to restart a new life etc. This study therefore suggests than an emotionally-intelligent criminal justice system is important to make offenders to restore their lives.