臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：直排輪活動參與者內團體衝突之研究
書刊名：造園學報
作者：王正平 引用關係／楊萃萍
作者(外文)：Wang, Cheng-ping／Yang, Tsui-ping
出版日期：2005
卷期：10:2
頁次：頁17-36
主題關鍵詞：目標干擾理論；內團體術突；直排輪活動；Goal interference theory；In-group conflict；Roller skating
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:36
  • 點閱點閱:11
以往遊憩衝突之相關研究多探討不同活動參與者之間的外團體衝突，而本研究是以目標干擾理論來探討大安森林公園直排輪活動參與者間內團體衝突之特性。研究結果顯示，直排輪者內團體衝突包含活動空間干擾、他團體干擾及方向性干擾等三個構面，其意義乃根據直排輪者在線性與平面進行方式之不同而呈現不同的衝突。此外，研究結果亦顯示不同的干擾類型有不同的影響因子。直排輪活動參與者所反應的資源特性無法顯著預測各類內團體衝突，而活動型態、經驗類型及生活型態容忍度可顯著影響直排輪活動參與者間所產生的遊憩衝突。本研究建議針對不同的衝突型式，公園管理單位可透過分區使用、分時使用及教育研習來降低遊憩衝突之發生。
The Purpose of this study are to investigate the in-group conflict among the roller skaters in Ta-An Forest Park and test the Goal Interference Theory (Jacob & Schreyer, 1980). The study results indicate in-group conflict of the roller skaters is composed of three dimensions, includnig Space Interference, Other Group Inteference, and Direction Interference. The three dimensions are extracted based on the space types (area or linear) the roller skaters use on the site. Different interferences are influenced by difference conflict factors. Resource specificity can't be the predictor of in-group conflict; however, activity style, mode of experience, and lifestyle tolerance significantly influence the in-group conflict. Based on the results, the study suggests zoning, scheduling use, and education program can be employed to reduce the in-group conflict among the roller skaters.
期刊論文
1.Adelman, B. J. E.、Heberlein, T. A.、Bonnicksen, T. M.(1982)。Social psychological explanations for the persistence of a conflict between paddling canoeists and motorcraft users in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area。Leisure Sciences，5，45-62。  new window
2.Devall, B.、Harry, J.(1981)。Who hates whom in the great outdoors: The impact of recreational specialization and technologies of play。Leisure Sciences，4，399-419。  new window
3.Ivy, M. I.、Stewart, W. P.、Lue, C. C.(1992)。Exploring the role of tolerance in recreational conflict。Journal of Leisure Research，24(4)，348-360。  new window
4.Owens, P. L.(1985)。Conflict as a social interaction process in environment and behaviour research: The example of leisure and recreation research。Journal of Environmental Psychology，5，243-259。  new window
5.Ramthun, R.(1995)。Factor in user group conflict between hikers and mountain bikers。Leisure Sciences，17，159-169。  new window
6.Schuster, R. M.、Hammitt, W. E.、Moore, D.(2003)。A theoretical model to measure the appraisal and coping response to hassles in outdoor recreation settings。Leisure Sciences，25(2/3)，277-299。  new window
7.Vaske, J. J.、Caroghers, P.、Donnelly, M. P.、Baird, B.(2000)。Recreation conflict among skiers and snowboarders。Leisure Sciences，22，297-313。  new window
8.Watson, A. E.、Niccolucci, M. J.、Williams, D. R.(1994)。The nature of conflict between hikers and recreational stock users in the John Muir Wilderness。Journal of Leisure Research，26(4)，372-385。  new window
9.Watson, A. E.、Williams, D. R.、Daigle, J. J.(1991)。Sources of conflict between hikers and mountain bike riders in the Rattlesnake NRA。Journal of Park and Recreation Administration，9(3)，59-71。  new window
10.侯錦雄、郭彰仁(19980600)。香客與戶外遊憩者之遊憩衝突探討--以松柏嶺宗教觀光區為例。戶外遊憩研究，11(2)，1-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.鍾文玲、林晏州(19930600)。釣魚者遊憩衝突認知之研究。戶外遊憩研究，6(1/2)，55-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Jackson, E. L.、Wong, R. A. G.(1982)。Perceived conflict between urban cross country skiers and snowmobilers in Alberta。Journal of Leisure Research，14(1)，47-62。  new window
13.Jacob, G. R.、Schreyer, R.(1980)。Conflict in outdoor recreation: A theoretical perspective。Journal of Leisure Research，12(4)，368-380。  new window
14.Miller, T. A.、McCool, S. F.(2003)。Coping with Stress in Outdoor Recreational Settings: An Application of Transactional Stress Theory。Leisure Science，25(2)，257-275。  new window
15.Gibbons, Shannon、Ruddell, Edward J.(1995)。The effect of goal orientation and place dependence on select goal interferences among winter backcountry users。Leisure Sciences，17(3)，171-183。  new window
16.顏家芝、薛雅菁、徐慧蓉、趙又萱、廖梨棉(20020300)。都會公園單車活動與直排輪活動／散步者之遊憩衝突研究。戶外遊憩研究，15(1)，1-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.王小文、林晏州(19980300)。大屯自然公園戶外遊憩者之遊憩衝突研究。戶外遊憩研究，11(1)，65-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Manning, R. E.、Valliere, W. A.(2001)。Coping in outdoor recreation: Causes and consequences of crowding and conflict among community residents。Journal of Leisure Research，33(4)，410-426。  new window
會議論文
1.Todd, S. L.、Graefe, A. R.(1989)。Level of experience and perception of conflict among canoeists on the Delaware River。the 1989 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium。USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station。147-155。  new window
學位論文
1.Wang, C.(2001)。Recreation Conflict between the Use of Motorboats, Personal Watercraft, and Riparian Lands in New York's Great Lakes Area.(博士論文)。College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York，Syracuse, New York。  new window
2.Widner, C.(1994)。Conflict among hikers and horseback riders in the Mount Rogers High County of Virginia(碩士論文)。The Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University，Blacksburg, Virginia。  new window
圖書
1.趙騏佑、簡健晃(2000)。直排輪Happy書。台北：書泉出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Manning, R. E.(1999)。Studies in Outdoor Recreation。OR：Oregon State University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Williams, D. R.、Patterson, M. E.(1999)。Environmental psychology: Mapping landscape meanings for ecosystem management。Integrating social sciences and ecosystem management: Human dimensions in assessment, policy and management。Champaign, IL：Sagamore。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：659（臺灣：647，外國：12） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2111296 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67903724
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上