國際關係理論的辯論、對話與綜合--美國「防止擴散安全提議」國際規範的個案分析_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
引文資料

題名：	國際關係理論的辯論、對話與綜合--美國「防止擴散安全提議」國際規範的個案分析
書刊名：	問題與研究
作者：	莫大華
作者(外文)：	Mo, Ta-hua
出版日期：	2006
卷期：	45:5
頁次：	頁17-60
主題關鍵詞：	理論綜合；理論對話；國際關係理論；理性主義；建構主義；Rationalism；Constructivism；Great debates；Theoretic Synthesis
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(3) 專書(1) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:2 共同引用:82 點閱:141

國際關係理論逐漸呈現以理論綜合的方式進行國際關係研究，國際規範研究是其中的重要議題之一，本文嘗試從國際規範的生命週期開始，運用「國際規範社群下的策略行動」（strategic actions in a international norm community），以理性主義（策略行為）與建構主義（規範行為）理論綜合的策略與研究途徑分析美國「防止擴散安全提議」，探索此國際規範的興起、擴展、內化與侵蝕階段時期中，不同國家的行為動機，藉以呈現說明理論綜合能提供不同面向的相互補充解釋。

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Krisch, Nico(2005)。International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order。European Journal of International Law，16(3)，369-408。
2.	Winner, Andrew C.(2005)。The Proliferation Security Initiative: The New Face of Interdiction。The Washington Quarterly，28(2)，129-143。
3.	Moravcsik, Andrew(2003)。Theory Synthesis in International Relations: Real Not Metaphysical。International Studies Review，5(1)，131-136。
4.	Finnemore, Martin(1993)。International Organization as Teachers of Norms: The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and Science Policy。International Organization，47(4)，565-598。
5.	Lapid, Yoself(1989)。The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivism Era。International Studies Quarterly，33(1)，235-254。
6.	Katzenstein, Peter、Keohane, Robert、Krasner, Stephen(1998)。International Organization and the Study of World Politics。International Organization，52(4)，645-685。
7.	Wendt, A.(2000)。On the Via Media: A Response to the Critics。Review of International Studies，26(1)，165-180。
8.	Hawkins, Darren(2004)。Explaining Costly International Institutions: Persuasion and Enforceable Human Rights Norms。International Studies Quarterly，48(4)，779-804。
9.	Schimmelfennig, Frank(2005)。Strategic Calculation and International Socialization: Membership Incentives, Party Constellations, and Sustained Compliance in Central and Eastern Europe。International Organization，59(4)，827-860。
10.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2001)。Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change。International Organization，55(3)，553-588。
11.	Risse, Thomas(2000)。"Let's Argue!": Communicative Action in World Politics。International Organization，54(1)，1-39。
12.	Barkin, J. Samuel(2003)。Realist Constructivism。INTERNATIONAL Studies Review，5(3)，325。
13.	Young, Oran R.(1991)。Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society。International Organization，45(3)，281-308。
14.	Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus、Nexon, Daniel H.(2004)。Constructivist Realism or Realist-Constructivism?。International Studies Review，6(2)，337-341。
15.	莫大華(2003)。理性主義與建構主義的辯論：國際關係理論的另一次大辯論？。政治科學論叢，19，113-138。延伸查詢
16.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(1998)。The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory。World Politics，50(2)，324-348。
17.	Schimmelfennig, Frank(2000)。International Socialization in the New Europe : Rational Action in an Institutional Environment。European Journal of International Relations，6(1)，109-139。
18.	Schimmelfennig, Frank(2001)。The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union。International Organization，55(1)，47-80。
19.	March, James G.、Olsen, John P.(1998)。The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders。International Organization，52(4)，943-969。
20.	Cortell, Andrew P.、Davis, James W., Jr.(1996)。How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms。International Studies Quarterly，40(4)，451-478。
21.	Brooks, Stephen G.、Wohlforth, William C.(2001)。Power, Globalization, and the End of the Cold War: Reevaluating a Landmark Case for Ideas。International Security，25(3)，5-53。
22.	Cortell, Andrew P.、Davis, James W. Jr.(2000)。Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norm: A Research Agenda。International Studies Review，2(1)，65-87。
23.	袁易(20030500)。海牙反彈道導彈擴散準則：國際規範之建立。問題與研究，42(3)，1-26。延伸查詢
24.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(1999)。Social Construction and Integration。Journal of European Public Policy，6(4)，545-560。
25.	Wendt, Alexander E.(1992)。Anarchy is What States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics。International Organization，46(2)，391-425。
26.	Finnemore, Martha、Sikkink, Kathryn(1998)。International Norm Dynamics and Political Change。International Organization，52(4)，887-917。
27.	袁易(20040500)。中國與導彈建制：國際規範之挑戰與遵循。問題與研究，43(3)，97-133。延伸查詢
28.	Ikenberry, G. John、Kupchan, Charles A.(1990)。Socialization and Hegemonic Power。International Organization，44(3)，283-315。
29.	Legro, Jeffrey W.(1997)。Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the 'failure' of Internationalism。International Organization，51(1)，31-63。
30.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(1997)。International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist- Constructivist Divide。European Journal of International Relations，3(4)，473-465。
31.	莫大華(20040700)。論析美國「防止擴散安全提議」的發展與展望。遠景基金會季刊，5(3)，27-98。延伸查詢
32.	Adler, E.(1992)。The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the International Evolution of the Idea of Nuclear Arms Control。International Organization，46(1)，101-145。
33.	Moravcsik, Andrew(2000)。The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe。International Organization，54(2)，217-252。
34.	Albright, David、Hinderstein, Corey(2005)。Unraveling the A. Q. Khan and Future Proliferation Networks。The Washington Quarterly，28(2)，111-128。
35.	Beach, Derek(2005)。Why Governments Comply: An Integrative Compliance Model that Bridges the Gap between Instrumental and Normative Models of Compliance?。Journal of European Public Policy，12(1)，113-142。
36.	Bjorkdahl, Annika(2002)。Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections。Cambridge Review of International Affairs，15(1)，9-23。
37.	Falkner, Gerda Miriam、Hartlapp, Simone Leiber、Treib, Oliver(2004)。Non-Compliance with EU Directives in the Member States: Opposition through the Backdoor?。West European Politics，27(3)，452-473。
38.	Fehl, Caroline(2004)。Explaining the International Criminal Court: A "Practice Test" for Rationalist and Constructivist Approaches。European Journal of International Relations，10(3)，357-394。
39.	Harbaugh, Erin E.(2004)。The Proliferation Security Initiative: Counterproliferation at the Crossroads。Strategic Insights，3(7)。
40.	Jentleson, Bruce W.、Whytock, Christopher A.(2005)。Who "Won" Libya?: The Force Diplomacy Debate and Its Implications for Theory and Policy。International Security，30(3)，47-86。
41.	Jupille, Joseph、Caporaso, James A.、Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2003)。Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union。Comparative Political Studies，31(1/2)，7-40。
42.	Kahler, Miles(1998)。Rationality in International Relations。International Organization，52(4)，919-942。
43.	Knopf, Jeffrey W.(2003)。The Importance of International Learning。Review of International Studies，29(2)，185-207。
44.	Logan, Samuel E.(2005)。The Proliferation Security Initiative: Navigating the Legal Challenges。Journal of Transnational Law and Policy，14(2)，253-274。
45.	Moravcsik, Andrew(1995)。Explaining International Human Rights Regimes: Liberal Theory and West Europe。European Journal of International Relations，1(2)，157-189。
46.	Petrova, Margarita H.(2003)。The End of the Cold War: A Battle or Bridging Ground Between Rationalist and Ideational Approaches in International Relations?。European Journal of International Relations，9(1)，115-163。
47.	Pollack, Mark A.(2005)。Theorizing the European Union: International Organization, Domestic Polity, or Experiment in New Governance?。Annual Review of Political Science，8，357-398。
48.	Richardson, Michael(2006)。The Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI): An Assessment of its Strengths and Weaknesses, with Some Proposals for Shaping its Future。Trends in Southeast Asia Series，3。
49.	Risse, Thomas(1999)。International Norms and Domestic Change: Arguing and Communicative Behavior in the Human Rights Area。Politics & Society，27(4)，529-559。
50.	Schimmelfennig, Frank(2003)。Strategic Action in a Community Environment: The Decision to Enlarge the European Union to the East。Comparative Political Studies，36(1/2)，156-183。
51.	Schweller, Randall L.、Wohlforth, William C.(2000)。Power Test: Evaluating Realism in Response to the End of the Cold War。Security Studies，6(3)，60-107。
52.	Sending, Ole Jacob(2002)。Constitution, Choice and Change: Problems with the "Logic of Appropriateness" and Its Use in Constructivist Theory。European Journal of International Relations，8(4)，443-470。
53.	Smith, Steve(2003)。Dialogue and the Reinforcement of Orthodoxy in International Relations。International Studies Review，5(1)，141-143。
54.	Walsh, James I.(2005)。Persuasion in International Politics: A Rationalist Account。Politics and Policy，33(4)，1-30。
55.	Wiener, Antje(2003)。Constructivism: The Limits of Bridging Gaps。Journal of International Relations and Development，6(2)，252-272。
56.	Zurn, Michael、Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2005)。Getting Socialized to Build Bridges: Constructivism and Rationalism, Europe and the Nation-State。International Organization，59(4)，1045-1079。

會議論文
1.	Busby, Joshua W.(2001)。Norms-Driven Coalitions, Domestic Norms Take-up, and the Second Image Reversed: the Case of the U.S. Anti-Child Labor Movement。0。
2.	Busby, Joshua William(2002)。Listen! Pay Attention! Transnational Social Movements, Communicative Action and Global Governance。0。
3.	Gofas, Andreas(2002)。Structure, Agency and Intersubjectivity: Re-capturing the EMU Policy Process in a Constructivist Realist Framework。0。
4.	Greve, Morten F.(2004)。Rationalism, Constructivism, and International Economic Institutions: Toward a New Research Agenda。0。
5.	Hoffmann, Matthew J.(2005)。Constructivist Ethics as Oxymoron?。0。
6.	Lewis, Jeffrey(2006)。Where Informal Rules Rule: The Council General Secretariat and Presidency in Everyday EU Decision Making。0。
7.	Lupovici, Amir(2006)。Let's Talk! Deterrence Norm as a Case Study for the Synthesis of Rational and Normative Approaches。0。
8.	Panke, Diana(2004)。Institutional Learning in the Shadow of the ECJ's Judicial Discourses: Argumentative Strategies and Compliance with European Norms。0。
9.	Panke, Diana(2005)。The Power of the Law vs. the Power of the Strongest? Explaining Successes and Failures of the European Court of Justice in Promoting Member State Compliance with EU Law。0。
10.	Rieker, Pernille(2004)。Conflicts and Cooperation: Reinterpreting French -US Relations and French Foreign Policy after 9/11。0。
11.	Tierney, Michael、Weaver, Catherine(2005)。Principles and Principles? The Possibilities for Theoretical Synthesis and Scientific Progress in the Study of International Organizations。0。
12.	Versluis, Esther(2005)。Compliance Problems in the EU: What Potential Role for Agencies in Securing Compliance?。0。
13.	Wiener, Antje(2001)。Social Facts in World Politics: The Value-Added of Constructivism。0。

研究報告
1.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2000)。Bridging the Rational-Choice/ Constructivist Gap? Theorizing Social Interaction in European Institutions。
2.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(1999)。Why Comply? Constructivism, Social Norms and the Study of International Institutions。
3.	Jupille, Joseph、Caporaso, James A.、Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2002)。Integrating Institutions: Theory, Method, and the Study of the European Union。沒有紀錄。
4.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(1999)。Sanctions, Social Learning and Institutions: Explaining State Compliance with the Norms of the European Human Rights Regime。0。
5.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2002)。Persuasion in International Institutions。0。
6.	Rule of Power or Rule of Law? An Assessment of U.S. Policies and Actions Regarding Security-Related Treaties。0。
7.	Rieker, Pernille(2004)。EU Security Policy: Contrasting Rationalism and Social Constructivism。0。
8.	Schimmelfennig, Frank(1996)。Legitimate Rule in the European Union: The Academic Debate。0。

圖書
1.	Farkas, Andrew(1998)。State Learning and International Change。Michigan：The University of Michigan Press。
2.	Frank Schimmelfennig(2003)。The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric。Cambridge, England：Cambridge University Press。
3.	McSweeney, Bill(1999)。Security, Identity, and Interest: A Sociology of International Relations。Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press。
4.	Clark, Ann Marie(2001)。Diplomacy of Conscience: Amnesty International and Changing Human Rights Norms。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。
5.	Ruggie, John Gerard(1998)。Constructing the World Polity: Essays in International Institutionalization。Routledge。
6.	Kuhn, Thomas S.、王道還(1969)。科學革命的結構。台北：遠流。延伸查詢
7.	Wendt, Alexander E.(1999)。Social Theory of International Politics。Cambridge：Harvard University Press。
8.	袁易(2004)。中國遵循國際導彈建制的解析：一個社會建構論的觀點。臺北市：五南圖書出版公司。延伸查詢
9.	Searle, John R.(1995)。The Construction of Social Reality。New York：Free Press。
10.	Lakatos, Imre、Worral, John、Currie, Gregory(1978)。The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
11.	楊永明(2010)。國際關係。前程文化事業有限公司。延伸查詢
12.	Hobson, John M.(2000)。The State and International Relations。Cambridge University Press。
13.	Walt, Stephen M.(1987)。The Origins of Alliances。Cornell University Press。
14.	莫大華(20030000)。建構主義國際關係理論與安全研究。臺北：時英。延伸查詢
15.	Keck, Margaret E.、Sikkink, Kathryn(1998)。Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics。Cornell University Press。
16.	Rittberger, Berthold、Schimmelfennig, Frank(2005)。The Constitutionalization of the European Union: Explaining the Parliamentarization and Institutionalization of Human Rights。Institute for Advanced Studies。
17.	Katzenstein, Peter Joachim(1996)。The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics。New York：Cambridge University Press。
18.	Kahler, Miles(1999)。Rationality in International Relations。Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics。Cambridge。
19.	(2004)。The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation: Theoretical Perspectives。The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation: Theoretical Perspectives。Cambridge。
20.	Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff(2006)。National Military Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction。National Military Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction。Washington, DC。
21.	(1998)。The Social Construction of Europe。The Social Construction of Europe。New York。
22.	Fearon, James、Wendt, Alexander(2002)。Rationalism vs. Constructivism: A Skeptical View。Handbook of International Relations。New York。
23.	Finnemore, Martha(1996)。National Interests and International Society。National Interests and International Society。Ithaca。
24.	Guzzini, Stefano、Leander, Anna(2006)。Wendt's Constructivism: A Relentless Quest for Synthesis。Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics。New York。
25.	(2005)。Poland's Non-Proliferation Policy: Documents。Poland's Non-Proliferation Policy: Documents。Warsaw。
26.	Peterson, Sue、Tierney, Michael。Survey of International Relations Faculty at U.S. Colleges and University: Teaching, Research, Policy, and Views on the Discipline。Survey of International Relations Faculty at U.S. Colleges and University: Teaching, Research, Policy, and Views on the Discipline。0。
27.	United Nations(2004)。A More Secured World: Our Shared Responsibility- Report of the Secretary-General's High-level on threats, Challenges and Change。A More Secured World: Our Shared Responsibility- Report of the Secretary-General's High-level on threats, Challenges and Change。New York。
28.	Wendt, Alexander(2006)。Social Theory as Cartesian Science: An Auto-Critique from a Quantum Perspective。Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics。New York。

其他
1.	U.S. DoD.，The White House(200212)。National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction，Washington DC：U.S. DoD。，http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/nspd/nspd-17.html.。
2.	National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction，沒有紀錄。
3.	Hill, Robert，Office of the Minister for Defence，The Senator the Hon。Media Conference for PSI Exercise，沒有紀錄。
4.	Cimoszewicz, Wlodzimierz。May 31 2004, Krakow - Proliferation Security Initiative Meeting，0。
5.	Coceano, Barry W.(2004)。The Proliferation Security Initiative: Challenges and Perceptions，Washington, DC。
6.	EUROPA-Gateway to European Union。European Union and United States Joint Program of Work on the Non-proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction，0。
7.	Feldt, Lutz。PSI as an Instrument for the Evolution of the International Law of the Sea-the German Maritime Contribution，0。
8.	Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark。Politisk DirektØrs Tale Til Oeg Psi，0。
9.	Nielson, Daniel，Tierney, Michael，Weaver, Catherine。Bridging the Rationalist- Constructivist Divide: Engineering Change at the World Bank，0。

圖書論文
1.	Waever, Ole(1996)。The Rise and Fall of the Inter-Paradigm Debate。International Theory: Positivism and Beyond。New York：Cambridge University Press。
2.	袁易(1999)。安全典制與美「中」關係：一個認知社群的分析架構。爭辯中的兩岸關係理論。臺北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。延伸查詢
3.	Risse-Kappen, Thomas(1996)。Collective Identity in a Democratic Community: The Case of NATO。The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics。New York, NY：Columbia University Press。
4.	Jepperson, Ronald L.、Wendt, Alexander、Katzenstein, Peter Joachim(1996)。Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security。The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics。Columbia University Press。
5.	Adler, Emanuel(1991)。Cognitive Evolution: A Dynamic Approach for the Study of International Relations and Their Progress。Progress in Postwar International Relations。New York, NY：Columbia University Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	美國針對性制裁中國大陸廠商的聽眾成本：訊號理論的剖析
2.	從建構主義視角分析美中競爭中越南的策略選擇
3.	以退為進：美國退出《中程核武條約》的戰略意圖與影響
4.	試從現實主義理論探討美「中」關係之發展
5.	我國關鍵基礎設施作為檢視--以行政院國土辦及法務部調查局為例
6.	從情報策略看美中的協作與協調
7.	Nicholas Onuf與Friedrich Kratochwil的社會理論、國際法與國際關係理論連結之比較分析
8.	聯合國「主權保護責任」與「人道軍事干預」規範的社會建構：建構主義的觀點
9.	「反軍事風尚」形成對臺灣國防安全之影響
10.	建構主義的爭論與評價
11.	近年間西方國際關係理論界之爭論與建構主義的崛起
12.	哈伯瑪斯的溝通行動理論與國際關係建構主義的結合
13.	論中國崛起：中、西方國際關係理論的觀點
14.	我國文化安全戰略的發展模式探討--建構主義的觀點
15.	國際關係實用建構主義理論的知識論分析

1.	中國大陸非政府組織與跨國倡議網絡：建構理論的觀點
2.	兩岸刑事司法合作規範的社會建構--以引渡與遣返為核心
3.	中國對於國際典則的非線性遵循：參與裁軍、智慧財產權與維和行動的案例研究
4.	歐洲整合發展與演進：權力、利益、認同與制度建構之整合分析
5.	東突厥斯坦問題與中共對策研究
6.	胡錦濤時期中共國家形象建構─建構主義觀點
7.	國家安全與危機決策之多元分析
8.	從國際合作框架探討區域經濟整合之可能性
9.	大國的衝突與合作- 小布希政府時期的美中關係
10.	中國大陸周邊外交戰略之研究：兼論對兩岸關係之影響(2002-2012)
11.	和諧世界觀下的中國外交政策
12.	從非傳統安全觀點探討人口安全問題－以中國大陸人口安全為例
13.	國際關係建構主義理論國家形象塑造的媒體因素之研究─以《聯合報》與《自由時報》對中國大陸國家形象建構為例（1999-2009）
14.	聯盟的本質：解釋後冷戰時期的北約存續
15.	國際關係規範建構主義與國際社會化：以氣候典則中的美中兩國社會化為例

1.	中國對外政策：從江澤民到習近平
2.	俄屬遠東黃禍論：身分、利益的解構與建構
3.	相對獲益與絕對獲益觀點下的東亞經濟合作
4.	國際安全理論 : 權力、主權與威脅
5.	國家安全的理論與實際
6.	身份政治 : 偶然性、能動者與情境
7.	兩岸是人為造成的制度 : 以建構主義為本體論的新制度分析
8.	中國遵循國際導彈建制的解析
9.	外交戰略與國際地位
10.	外交戰略與國際地位
11.	規範建構主義與兩岸關係：理論與實踐
12.	台灣「南向」世界觀的建構 : 亞太海、陸爭霸的觀點

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫