資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.12.136.186)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Is it Difficult to Acquire Subjacency and the ECP?
書刊名:
Taiwan Journal of Linguistics
作者:
陳純音
/
黃心怡
作者(外文):
Chen, Doris Chun-yin
/
Huang, Candy Hsin-yi
出版日期:
2006
卷期:
4:1
頁次:
頁89-129
主題關鍵詞:
中文
;
疑問詞
;
問句
;
空號原則
;
承接條件
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:40
本文主旨在應用「第二語言習得」理論,探討外籍學生中文疑問詞問句中兩項參數:承接條件(Subjacency)及空號原則(ECP)的習得情形。針對以上兩參數之特性(如:優先作用(superiority effects),「補語連詞+痕跡」作用(that-trace effects),主/受詞不對稱作用(subject/object asymmetries),疑問詞島嶼限制(wh-island constraints),複合名詞組限制(complex NP constraints),子句主語限制(sentential subject constraints),本實驗共設計喜好測驗和看圖排序測驗。研究對象為就讀於國立臺灣師大國語中心的20名以英語為母語和20名以日語為母語的外籍學生,以及20名以中文為母語的中國人。實驗結果顯示,除英語組在優先作用上仍然有些許母語轉換的現象外,英語組與日語組都正確地將母語設定值轉換為所學習語言的設定值,證實了普遍語法在第二語言習得中的確扮演了重要的角色。此外,三組實驗對象都在「無優先作用」的題目上表現較弱,日語組的表現並沒有明顯地比英語組來得好。最後,本實驗亦發現「空號原則」並沒有比「承接條件」難習得。
以文找文
This paper aims to examine English- and Japanese-speaking adult learners' acquisition of Subjacency¹ and the Empty Category Principle² (ECP) (Chomsky 1981, 1986) in Chinese. The participants were forty intermediate foreign students of the Mandarin Training Center of National Taiwan Normal University: half were native English speakers and half Japanese. In addition, there were twenty native controls. Two tasks (i.e., a preference task and an ordering task) were designed on the basis of the following properties concerning Subjacency and the ECP: wh-island constraints, complex NP constraints, sentential subject constraints, that-trace effects and subject/object asymmetries, and superiority effects. The results show that, except for the superiority effect, neither group of L2 learners carried their L1 knowledge to acquire Subjacency and the ECP, suggesting that L1 influence is not significant. Furthermore, it was found that the Japanese speakers did not perform significantly better than the English speakers. This shows that Universal Grammar is still available, since our participants have reset their L1 parameters to proper L2 values. In addition, among these features our participants did less well on non-superiority, and the native controls rejected island violations more strongly than either group of L2 participants. Finally, Subjacency and the ECP were found equally easy for our participants to acquire.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Clahsen, H.、Muysken, P.(1986)。The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners--a study of the acquisition of German word order。Second Language Research,2(2),93-119。
2.
Schachter, J.(1988)。Second language acquisition and its relationship to universal grammar。Applied Linguistics,9(3),219-236。
3.
Bley-Vroman, R. W.、Felix, S. W.、Ioup, G. L.(1988)。The accessibility of universal grammar in adult language learning。Second Language Research,4(1),1-32。
4.
Epstein, S.、Flynn, S.、Martohardjono, G.(1996)。Explanation in theories of second language acquisition。Behavioral and Bra in Science,19(4),677-758。
5.
Katada, F.(1991)。The LF representation of anaphors。Linguistic Inquiry,22(2),287-313。
6.
White, L.、Genesee, F.(1996)。How native is near-native? The Issue of ultimate attainment in adult language acquisition。Second Language Research,12(3),233-265。
7.
Schachter, J.、Yip, V.(1990)。Why does anyone object to subject extraction?。Studies in Second Language Acquisition,12(4),379-392。
8.
Uziel, S.(1993)。Resetting universal grammar parameters: Evidence from second language acquisition of Subjacency and the Empty Category principle。Second Language Research,9(1),49-83。
9.
Johnson, Jacqueline S.、Newport, Elissa L.(1991)。Critical period effects on universal properties of language: the status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language。Cognition,39(3),215-258。
會議論文
1.
Chen, C. Y. Doris、Huang, H. Y. Candy(2001)。Is it easy for CSL learners to acquire Subjacency and the ECP?。International Association of Chinese Linguistics 10th Annual Conference with NACCL-13。Irvine, U.S.A:University of California。
2.
Cheng, L. R.(1994)。'Say' and 'See' as Complementizers in Taiwanese and Taiwan Mandarin。Third International Symposium on Mandarin Teaching,49-72。
學位論文
1.
Chen, C. Y. Doris(1991)。Reindexing and Some Asymmetries in Universal Grammar(博士論文)。Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign。
2.
Martohardjono, G.(1993)。Wh-Movement in the Acquisition of a Second Language: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Three Languages with and with out Syntactic Movement(學士論文)。Comelt University,Ithaca。
3.
Otsu, Y.(1981)。Universal Grammar and Syntactic Development in Children: to warda Theory of Syn tactic Development(博士論文)。MIT,Cambridge。
4.
Saito, M.(1985)。Some As ymmetries in Japanese and their The oretical Implication(博士論文)。MIT,Cambridge。
5.
Sarma, J.(1992)。The Acquisition of Wh-Questions in English(博士論文)。Univ. of Connecticut,Connecticut。
6.
Yoshinaga, N.(1996)。Wh-Questions: A Comparative Study ofT heir Formand Acquisition in English and Japanese(博士論文)。University of Hawaii,Manoa。
7.
Huang, Cheng-Teh James(1982)。Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of grammar(博士論文)。Massachusetts Institute of Technology。
圖書
1.
Chen, J.(1986)。AnInvestigation of the Patternsof Learning English Interrogative Structuresby EFL Learners in China。Hong Kong:The Chinese University of Hong Kong MA thesis。
2.
Huang, H.(1999)。An Experimental Study of Subjacencyand the ECP in Second Language Acquisition of Chinese。Taipei:National Taiwan Normal University MA thesis。
3.
White, Lydia(1989)。Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition。Amsterdam:John Benjamins。
4.
Gass, Susan M.、Selinker, Larry(1992)。Language Transfer in Language Learning。John Benjamins Publishing Company。
5.
Flynn, Suzanne(1987)。A Parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition。Dordrecht:D. Reidel。
6.
Li, Charles Na、Thompson, Sandra Annear(1981)。Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar。University of California Press。
7.
Chomsky, Noam(1986)。Barriers。MIT Press。
8.
Chomsky, Noam(1981)。Lectures on Government and Binding。Foris Publications。
圖書論文
1.
Felix, S. W.(1988)。UG-generated knowledge in adult second language acquisition。Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition。Dordrecht:Kluwer。
2.
Schachter, J.(1989)。Testing a proposed universal。Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。
3.
Li, X.(1998)。Adult L2 accessibility to UG: An issue revisited。The Generative Study of Second Language Acquisition。New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。
4.
White, L.、Juffs, A.(1998)。Constraints on Wh-movement in two different contexts of nonnative language acquisition: Competence and processing。The Generative Study of Second Language Acquisition。New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。
5.
White, L.(1992)。Subjacency violation and empty categories in L2 acquisition。Island Constraints。Dordrecht:Kluwer。
6.
Vainikka, A.、Young-Scholten, M.(1991)。Verb raising in second language Acquisition: The Early Stages。Theoriedes Lexikons。Universitat Dusseldorf。
7.
White, L.(1988)。Island effects in second language acquisition。Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition。Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers。
8.
Martohardjono, G.(1998)。Measuring competence in L2 acquisition: Commentary on part II。The Generative Study of Second Language Acquisition。New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
無相關期刊論文
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
閩南語的是非問句與正反問句
2.
漢語的正反問句 : 北京語與閩南語的比較分析
3.
UG and A-not-A Questions in L2 Chinese
4.
菲律賓的華文學校
5.
語料庫技術在華文動漫教材中的應用:以新加坡「我的華文動漫書」為例
6.
美國華語教學碩士項目比較研究
7.
從語義和句法互動的角度,看近義詞「美麗」和「漂亮」
8.
Acquiring Double Object Verbs in Mandarin Chinese
9.
談2008年對外華語教學能力認證考試:以華語文教學考題分析為例
10.
外國學生漢語疑問句習得之比較
QR Code