:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Democratization of Candidate Selection in Taiwanese Political Parties
書刊名:選舉研究
作者:羅達菲
作者(外文):Fell, Dafydd
出版日期:2006
卷期:13:2
頁次:頁167-197
主題關鍵詞:黨內民主化政黨提名制度政黨變遷派系Inner-party democracyPolitical partiesCandidate selectionParty changeFactionalism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:172
  • 點閱點閱:42
本研究將處理文獻中有關候選人選擇的兩個主要問題,分別是如何區分候選人提名方法以及解釋為何不同的候選人提名方式的演變以及被採行。簡言之,本研究詳述在1980年代後期台灣的候選人提名程序如何以及為何調整。本研究採用七點的量表分析政黨提名民主化的程度,其中,以1代表最開放的候選人提名方法,7代表直接由政黨領袖提名。台灣政黨的黨內民主自1989年以來劇烈擺盪。雖然民進黨與國民黨在立法委員提名上已經達到各自最民主的階段,不過兩個主要政黨也出現重新採用最威權的提名方式,且政黨領袖強烈抗拒將提名權下放給黨員或是支持者。   論者或謂主宰改變有兩個因素:黨內為各派系的權力平衡,黨外則為選舉結果。黨內派系或是政黨領袖不會因為意識型態的動機而推動更具民主的提名方式,不過,卻可能因為政黨內主要領袖與派系的各自利益或是權力,改而推動更為民主或是集權的提名方式。此外,政黨也會因為選舉結果不理想或是改善未來選舉的前景而改變提名方式。
This research attempts to tackle two of the principle questions promi-nent in the literature on candidate selection; namely how to classify candi-date selection methods and how to explain change in candidate selection methods adopted. In other words this is a detailed analysis of how and why Taiwanese candidate selection procedures have been adjusted since the late 1980s. A seven-point scale has been adopted to measure the degree of democratisation in candidate selection, in which 1 equals the most open democratic nomination system, while 7 equals a nomination method dicta-ted by the party leader. The pendulum of Taiwan’s inner party democracy has swung sharply in both directions since 1989. Although the KMT and DPP have both reached their most democratic procedures for selecting legislative candidates, there have been instances of a return to authoritarian nomination methods in all major parties, and strong resistance from party leaders to delegating greater nominating power to ordinary party members or supporters. It is argued that there have been two critical forces governing the direc-tion of change; the internal variable of factional balance of power, and the external variable of election results. Party factions and leaders have not pro-moted more inclusive nomination methods out of ideological motivations. Instead nomination methods have been democratized or centralized when the dominant leader or faction has viewed such changes as promoting their own interests and power. In addition, parties have altered nominations methods either in response to poor election results or with a view to improving future election prospects.
期刊論文
1.Harmel, Robert、Janda, Kenneth(1994)。An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change。Journal of Theoretical Politics,6(3),259-287。  new window
2.Wu, Chung-li、Fell, Dafydd(2001)。Taiwan's Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective。Japanese Journal of Political Science,2(1),23-45。  new window
3.Wu, Chung-li(2001)。The Transformation of the Kuomintang's Candidate Selection System。Party Politics,7(1),103-118。  new window
4.Rahat, Gideon、Hazan, Reuven Y.(2001)。Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework。Party Politics,7(3),297-322。  new window
5.Rigger, Shelley(20021200)。Political Science and Taiwan's Domestic Politics: The State of the Field。Issues & Studies,38(4)/39(1),49-92。new window  new window
6.Baum, Julian(1992)。Building the Ballot。Far Eastern Economic Review,155(39),14-14。  new window
7.Bille, Lars(2001)。Democratizing a Democratic Procedure: Myth or Reality?。Party Politics,7(3),363-380。  new window
8.Krister, Lundell(2004)。Determinants of Candidate Selection: Degree of Decentralization in Comparative Perspective。Party Politics,10(1),25-47。  new window
9.Stockton, Hams(2001)。Political Parties, Party Systems and Democracy in East Asia。Comparative Political Studies,34(1),94-120。  new window
10.Tan, Alexander(2002)。The Transformation of the Kuomintang Party。Democratization,9(3),149-164。  new window
會議論文
1.吳重禮(1998)。Evaluation of Taiwan's Party Primaries。0。  new window
學位論文
1.吳重禮(1997)。Taiwanese Political Parties: Social Change and Response,0。  new window
圖書
1.Gallagher, Michael、Marsh, Michael(1988)。Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics。London:SAGE。  new window
2.Scarrow, Susan(1996)。Parties and Their Members: Organizing for Victory in Britain and Germany。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Schafferer, Christian(2003)。The Power of the Ballot Box: Political Development and Election Campaigning in Taiwan。Lanham, Md.:Lexington Books。  new window
4.王業立(200108)。比較選舉制度。台北:五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Rigger, Shelley(1999)。Politics in Taiwan: Voting for Democracy。Routledge。  new window
6.陳明通(1996)。Local Factions and Elections in Taiwan Democratization。Taiwan Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition: Riding the Third Wave。Armonk, NY。  new window
7.Baum, Julian、Robinson, James(1999)。Party Primaries in Taiwan: Trends, Conditions, and Projections in Candidate Selection。Party Primaries in Taiwan: Trends, Conditions, and Projections in Candidate Selection。Baltimore, MD。  new window
8.Cheng, Ming-The(2004)。Factional Politics in the DPP。Factional Politics in the DPP。Taipei。  new window
9.羅達菲(2005)。Party Politics in Taiwan。Party Politics in Taiwan。London, UK。  new window
10.關中(1992)。Pursuing Democracy Cannot be Afraid of Troubles。Pursuing Democracy Cannot be Afraid of Troubles。Taipei。  new window
圖書論文
1.Mair, Peter(1994)。Party Organizations: From Civil Society to the State。How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE