The categories of Human Rights have accumulated continuously; and with this accumulation, there arises paradoxical phenomena, namely the Human Rights Paradox. I sort Human Rights into five categories: (1) welfare rights; (2) equality rights; (3) liberty rights; (4) political rights; and (5) progress rights; from of these take place ten correlations, mostly retributive, yet some contradictory. Hence, the indication of the contradictions is the theoretical basis of exterminating obstacles to human rights. The analyses are as follows: Ⅰ. Welfare Rights versus Equality Rights: from the capitalistic ways of production to the accumulation of wealth through knowledge economy, the unequal distribution among human beings has, from the communal production and distribution among primitive societies, or the minimal indifference based on agricultural productions, evolved into a great inequality. Ⅱ. Welfare Rights versus Liberty Rights: On the one hand, euthanasia, the voluntarily termination of life, is an impact on welfare rights. On the other hand, the production-wise effective assembly line has interrupted the human wisdom of creativity and freedom of the mind in general. Ⅲ. Welfare Rights versus Political Rights: both the political issues that demand professionalism and production goals that demand expertise remain a dilemma, and a difficult line is yet to be drawn concerning the when and how the right of disobedience of the inferior could be justified to take place. Ⅳ. Welfare Rights versus Progress Rights: the massive exploitation of natural resources based on modern technology has greatly improved Welfare Rights, yet this exploitation has devastated nature as a whole, and such conflict between the privilege of the environment and the privilege of welfare rights is in grave dispute, and is likely to affect the welfare of future generations. Ⅴ. Equality Rights versus Liberty Rights: in political consciousness, liberty and equality can become united; yet in economic fields, the full liberation of a free economy is in reality generation great inequality. Ⅵ. Equality Rights versus Political Rights: to ensure the security of minority groups, they are permitted in many cases to join an equalized participation in politics forged to being within a framework based on proportional design. Within this design it is impossible to distribute the chances of political participation according to the capability of an individual. Such Equal Opportunity not only creates another inequality, but also affects competitiveness as well. Ⅶ. Equality Rights versus Progress Rights: Modern technology is the driving source of Progress Rights, and its surprising advancement is particularly evident in the economic field. Production energy greatly increased the distance between Equality Rights and Progress Rights, and how to herald the principle of justice during distribution without affecting Equality Rights is the main topic heatedly debated by philosophers such as Rawls and Nozick of the 20th century. Ⅷ. Liberty Rights and Political rights: To what degree would freedom not affect political stability, and, especially, what is the impact on a body politic when freedoms of speech and press have greatly aggravated the collision between the media and the civil government? Ⅸ. Liberty Rights versus Progress Rights: the strength of the restraints that the policies of the state and the society set upon the Liberty Rights of an individual is a paradox between the rights of the body politic and the rights of the individual. Ⅹ. Political Rights versus Progress Rights: While a nation develops, it needs the assistance of the international society. Nations offering aid to nations in need is impossible to exempt demands and terms in return, which would affect the latter nations' Progress Rights. Human Rights are inborn with a matrix. As History progresses, every general Human Rights would generate other Human Rights, and some would form with others paradoxes. The main purpose of Human Rights Study is to expand their similarities, meanwhile comprehending their paradoxes, and resolving their points of dispute in advance, thereby achieving fluent success as Human Rights progress.