:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣護理學會2004年與2005年護理專案審查結果之回顧與分析
書刊名:護理雜誌
作者:張文英王憲華紀淑靜陳麗芳顧艷秋尹裕君
作者(外文):Chang, Wen-yinWang, Shian-huaChi, Shu-chingChen, Li-fanKu, Yan-chiouYin, Yu-chun
出版日期:2007
卷期:54:2
頁次:頁29-37
主題關鍵詞:護理專案審查意見通過率Nursing projectReviewer commentsPass rate
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:78
  • 點閱點閱:97
護理專案為進階制度中N4的專業能力訓練重點之一,但有關其成效之研究卻相當匱乏,故本研究目的旨在 (1) 分析台灣護理學會2004年與2005年護理專案的屬性、醫院屬性、專案得分及通過情形;(2) 比較專案通過與專案屬性及醫院屬性之差異性。本研究設計採回顧性內容分析比較,資料來源為2004與2005年之護理專案審查意見表。資料以描述性統計如個案數、百分比、平均值、標準差及卡方檢定或Fisher exact test進行分析。本研究符合收案條件的護理專案共1,062篇,其中有423篇須三審,最後以2,547份專案評審意見表進行資料分析。專案之平均得分為59.7分(SD=9.3分),以行政、北部地區、醫學中心、私立醫院之專案為最多,而通過率卻以公立醫院之40.7%為最高。幾乎所有審查者(n=2,515份;98.7%)都有提供審查意見。本研究發現專案通過與否不會因科別、受理範圍、醫院之地理分佈及醫院評鑑箏級而有統計上之顯著差異 (p>.05),但會與醫院權屬別有統計上之顯著差異 (p=.01)。本研究之結果將可作為未來進階制度中護理專案要求之決策及提升護理專案質與量之參考依據。
Although a nursing project is one of the important N4 professional competence training courses in the clinical ladder system, little research on its effectiveness can be found. This study therefore aimed to analyze the demographics, hospital characteristics, scores, and pass rates for the Taiwan Nurses Association's 2004 to 2005 nursing projects and to compare the differences between them. The design was retrospective content analysis and the data sources were nursing project reviewer sheets from the years 2004 and 2005. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, such as number, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and Chi-square test, or Fisher exact test. We analyzed 1,062 nursing projects. Of these, 423 projects had third reviewers. After that, 2,547 reviewer sheets were used as final samples. The average project score was 59.7 points (SD=9.3 points) and the majority of the projects were categorized as administrative and from medical centers, or private hospitals in northern areas of Taiwan. The pass rate was found to be higher in public hospitals, however, than in private hospitals. Almost all the projects (n=2,515; 98.7%) included reviewers' comments. There was no significant difference between project pass rate and clinical specialty, scope, hospital location, and level of hospital accreditation (p>.05). A significant difference was found, however, between project scores and hospital characteristics (p=.01). These findings may serve as references in the development of future requirements for nursing projects in the clinical ladder system, to improve the quality and quantity of such projects.
期刊論文
1.邱育芳、劉長安、陳淑銘(20041100)。輔導護理人員參與「基層護理人員專業能力進階制度」之方案。高雄護理雜誌,21(2),26-34。  延伸查詢new window
2.林佳璇、連偉伶(20030200)。護理在職進修學士學生生活經驗與調適過程之探討。護理雜誌,50(1),49-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李麗傳(19990500)。行政專案的書寫。國防醫學,28(5),403-406。  延伸查詢new window
4.洪世欣、黃淑鶴、謝雅宜、謝麗鳳、陳梅麗、汪蘋(20050300)。專科護理師執業現況與專業能力之探討。榮總護理,22(1),68-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳玉雲(20020100)。護理進階報告書寫指引。寶建醫護雜誌,1(1),8-13。  延伸查詢new window
6.Copeland, S.(2005)。Innovative ways to promote recruitment, retention, collegiality, and professionalism using continuing education plans。The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing,36(5),226-228。  new window
7.Drenkard, K.、Swartwout, E.(2005)。Effective of a clinical ladder program。Journal of Nursing Administration,35(11),502-506。  new window
8.Loo, R.(2003)。Project management: A core competency for professional nurses and nurse managers。Journal for Nurses in Staff Development,19(4),187-193。  new window
9.Williams, J.、Murphy, P.(2005)。Better project management: Better patient outcomes。Nursing Management,36(11),41-47。  new window
10.尹裕君、鄒慧韞、張淑容、顧治湄(1999)。醫院基層護理人員臨床專業能力進階制度推展計劃報告。護理雜誌,46(6),5-8。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳綱華、李選、張綺紋(20050900)。護理臨床進階制度的現況與未來發展。慈濟護理雜誌,4(3),14-20。  延伸查詢new window
12.嚴玉華(20040600)。醫院護理人員在職教育訓練與專業能力進階制度之探討。東港安泰醫護雜誌,10(2),70-76。  延伸查詢new window
13.Levett-Jones, T. L.(2005)。Continuing education for nurses: A necessity or a nicety。Continuing Education for Nurses,36(5),229-233。  new window
14.汪蘋、洪世欣、謝佑珊、尹祚芊(20030400)。醫學中心基層護理人員臨床專業能力進階制度實施經驗分享。護理雜誌,50(2),30-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.盧美秀(20040800)。我國護理教育的現況與展望。護理雜誌,51(4),11-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.陳國瑚、陳麗如、蘇喜(20060600)。護理人員對護理工作認知與離職傾向之探討。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,25(3),177-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.徐南麗、李茹萍、李芸茹、賴正芬、彭台珠(20030300)。護理人員進階制度實施後主客觀護理能力差異之比較。慈濟護理雜誌,2(1),53-62。  延伸查詢new window
18.曾珍麗、尹裕君、陳都美(19970300)。護理人員能力進階制度實施成效之探討。榮總護理,14(1),52-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳玉枝(1993)。護理行政專案五年回顧。護理行政專案研習會暨第五次護理行政專案發表會,中華民國護理學會主辦 。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.臺灣護理學會(20040717)。醫院基層護理人員臨床專業能力進階制度規劃指引,http://www.twna.org.tw/frontend/un10_open/welcome.asp#, 2006/08/23。  延伸查詢new window
2.臺灣護理學會(2006)。臺灣護理學會第17次護理專案發表會相關資訊分享,http://www.twna.org.tw/frontend/un10_open/welcome.asp#, 2006/09/27。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2005)。民國94年醫療機構現況及醫療服務量統計摘要,http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/data/醫療服務量現況及服務結果摘要/94摘要表, 2006/09/07。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE