「行政院公平交易委員會裁處罰鍰額度參考表」施行迄今已經超過6年。原則上，行政法院都認同公平交易委員會裁處的罰鍰。惟晚近卻屢加質疑「行政院公平交易委員會裁處罰鍰額度參考表」之考量項目及適用等級，進而撤銷公平交易委員會的處分。鑑於實務趨勢之轉變，本文介紹罰鍰額度形成所根據的「行政院公平交易委員會裁處罰鍰額度參考表」之生成及沿革，並就各國相關立法例及國內其他機關有關裁罰之相關規定加以比較，釐清「行政院公平交易委員會裁罰鍰額度參考表」的法律性質與行政機關判斷餘地間之關係。尤其，針對行政法院撤銷公平交易委員會相關案例，探討撤銷之理由，並就行政法院得否審查行政機關之裁量內容及界線，加以論述。最後，提出應廢止或大幅修正裁罰表之內容及理由，並就公平交易委員會將來裁處罰鍰額度之運作，提出若干具體建議。

"The Reference to Considerations for Imposition (RCI) of Fair Trade Commission (FTC)" has come into force for over six years. Generally, the administrative courts may consent to impositions made by FTC. However, the courts recently started to question the listed- and classed standards of the RCI, and then revoked the impositions frequently. Seeing the Changes of the Practical exercises, this article is to introduce the birth and history of the RCI, according to which the amount of a fine shall be decided, and to compare the RCI with the foreign legislations the imposition regulations of the other domestic authorities in order to make clear the relationship between the nature of the RCI and the authorized discretion. Especially, it is also to discuss cases in which the impositions made by FTC are revoked by courts and the reasoning thereof, so as to find out the boundaries to which the administrative courts is allowed examining the Discretion of FTC. At last, it is to indicate how and why the RCI shall be abolished or revised to certain extend, and to put forward some suggestions concerning the future exercise of the imposition of FTC.