資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.144.113.67)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
臺灣金融改革的政治分析:ACTA模型的檢驗
書刊名:
東吳政治學報
作者:
陳尚懋
作者(外文):
Chen, Shang-mao
出版日期:
2007
卷期:
25:1
頁次:
頁115-160
主題關鍵詞:
臺灣金融改革
;
透明化
;
問責
;
Taiwan financial reform
;
Transparency
;
Accountability
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
4
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
4
共同引用:
5
點閱:27
1998年台灣爆發了本土型的金融危機,當時的國民黨政府採取了相關的改革政策,希望可以幫助台灣走出金融風暴的陰影,但卻是透過國民黨的黨營事業針對政商關係良好的企業進行抒困,如此親信資本主義(crony capitalism)式的危機處理政策反而加大了危機的廣度與深度。新上台的民進黨總統陳水扁於是宣布2001年為金融改革元年,在「二五八」金改政策的努力之下,台灣的金融體系總算是達到了初步的穩定。但是台灣金融改革是否已經成功?後續金融改革成功的關鍵到底為何?本文觀察政黨輪替前後金融改革成效的差異,認為金改最主要的關鍵因素在於治理結構(governance structure)與監理架構(regulatory framework)的ACTA。所謂的ACTA係指:自主性(autonomy)、職能(capacity)、透明化(transparency)與問責(accountability)。本文最主要的論點在於:治理結構的ACTA會由上而下影響監理架構的ACTA,而後這兩者的互動會更進一步影響金融體系(financial system)的表現。因此台灣往後金融改革成功的關鍵就在於如何維持與提升治理結構與監理架構的ACTA。
以文找文
This paper explores the domestic institutional arrangements and relationships among key political and financial actors in the process of Taiwan’s financial reform. Affected by the 1997 Asian financial crisis, many Taiwanese enterprises have reported serious problems in their financial structures since 1998. The previous KMT government adopted bail-out policies to stabilize the financial system, but these measures only deepened the severity of the looming crisis in Taiwan’s financial markets. In 2000, the DDP candidate Chen Shui-bian won the presidential election, and not long after taking office announced that the year 2001 would usher in a new era of financial reform. What are the key factors needed for the success of financial reform in Taiwan? In order to answer this question, I have developed a model, called the “ACTA Model”. I have used four institutional variables, namely: autonomy, capacity, transparency, and accountability (ACTA), and three analytical levels: governance structure, regulatory framework, and financial system to analyze the financial reform dynamics in Taiwan. In conclusion, this study shows that the ACTA of a governance structure will influence the ACTA of a regulatory framework from the top, and the institutional relationships between the governance structure and regulatory framework will influence the financial system jointly. Therefore the ACTA of a governance structure and regulatory framework are critical for financial reform.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
陳麒而(2000)。大亨政治身價節節高。財訊,220,176-179。
延伸查詢
2.
MacDonald, Scott B.(1998)。Transparency in Thailand's 1997 Economic Crisis: The Significance of Disclosure。Asian Survey,38(7),688-702。
3.
Radelet, S.、Sachs, J.(1998)。The East Asian financial crisis: diagnosis, remedies, prospects。Brookings Papers Economic Activity,28(1),1-74。
4.
Moe, Terry M.(1984)。The New Economics of Organization。American Journal of Political Science,28(4),739-777。
5.
DiMaggio, Paul J.、Powell, Walter W.(1983)。The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields。American Sociological Review,48(2),147-160。
6.
Crawford, Sue E. S.、Ostrom, Elinor(1995)。A Grammar of Institutions。American Political Science Review,89(3),582-600。
7.
Kuo, Cheng-tian、Tsai, Tzeng-jia(19981100)。Differential Impact of the Foreign Exchange Crisis on Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea: A Politico-Institutional Explanation。Issues & Studies,34(11/12),144-180。
8.
范江哲寶(2001)。2000年一百大企業集團大調查。商業周刊,708,108-135。
延伸查詢
9.
康添財(1999)。臺灣政府加速銀行財務惡化。商業周刊,588,40-41。
延伸查詢
10.
仁書萍(1998)。銀行、營建業面臨嚴重衝擊。商業周刊,564,31-32。
延伸查詢
會議論文
1.
林寶安(2002)。臺灣1990年代的金融擠兌、合併與金融秩序。0。
延伸查詢
2.
Iwasaki, Yoshihiro(2000)。At the Roots of the Asian Crisis: Governance and Transparency?。Phnom Penh, Kampuchea。
3.
Yin, Norman(2001)。Taiwan Financial Crisis?: The Nature of the Banking Problems in Taiwan。Tokyo, Japan。
研究報告
1.
Radelet, Steven、Sachs, Jeffery D.(1998)。The Onset of the East Asian Financial Crisis。
2.
Vishwanath, Tara、Kaufmann, Daniel(1999)。Towards Transparency in Finance and Governance。Washington, DC。
3.
Walter, Andrew(2002)。Financial Liberalization and Prudential Regulation in East Asia: Still Perverse?。Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies。
4.
Kaufmann, Daniel、Kraay, Aart、Mastruzzi, Massimo(2003)。Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996-2002。
學位論文
1.
陳尚懋(1998)。台灣銀行政策的政治經濟分析(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。
延伸查詢
2.
Leon, Jose Luis(2000)。State Capacity, State Autonomy and Economic Performance: Industrial Policy in Mexico, 1950-2000(博士論文)。Columbia University。
圖書
1.
International Institute for Management Development(2001)。The World Competitiveness Yearbook。The World Competitiveness Yearbook。Lausanne, Switzerland:International Institute for Management Development。
2.
Robison, Richard、Beeson, Mark、Jayasuriya, Kanishka、kim, Hyuk-Rae(2000)。Politics and Markets in the Wake of the Asian Crisis。New York:Routledge。
3.
Flinders, M. V.(2001)。The Politics of Accountability in the Modern State。London, UK:Baker & Taylor Books:Ashgate。
4.
Schedler, Andreas、Diamond, Larry、Plattner, Marc F.(1999)。The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies。Lynne Rienner Publishers。
5.
Phongpaichit, Pasuk、Baker, Christopher John(2000)。Thailand’s Crisis。Chiang Mai, Thailand:Silkworm Books。
6.
North, Douglass C.(1980)。Structure and Change in Economic History。New York:London:W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.。
7.
Zysman, John(1983)。Governments, Markets, and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change。Ithaca:Cornell University Press。
8.
Brinton, Mary C.、Nee, Victor(1998)。The New Institutionalism in Sociology。New York:Russell Sage Foundation。
9.
Goldstein, Morris(1998)。The Asian Financial Crisis: Causes, Cures and Systemic Implications。Washington, DC:Institute for International Economics。
10.
Weiss, Linda(1998)。The Myth of The Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era。Polity Press。
11.
Haggard, Stephan、Mo, Jongryn(2000)。The Political Economy of the Asian Financial Crisis。Washington, DC:Institute for International Economics。
12.
Williamson, Oliver E.(1975)。Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications。New York, NY:Free Press。
13.
Evans, Peter B.(1995)。Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。
14.
Eggertsson, Thráinn(1990)。Economic Behavior and Institutions。Cambridge University Press。
15.
Williamson, Oliver E.(1985)。The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms Markets, Relational Contracting。Macmillan, Ltd:Free Press。
16.
(1996)。Empirical Studies in Institutional Change。Empirical Studies in Institutional Change。New York, NY。
17.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision(1998)。Enhancing Bank Transparency: Public Disclosure and Supervisory Information that Promote Safety and Soundness in Banking Systems。Basel:Bank for International Settlements。
18.
Bank for International Settlements(1998)。Report of the Working Group on Transparency and Accountability。Basel:Bank for International Settlements。
19.
International Monetary Fund(1999)。Code of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary and Financial Policies。Washington, DC:International Monetary Fund。
20.
(1999)。Politics of the Asian Economic Crisis。Politics of the Asian Economic Crisis。Ithaca, NY。
21.
Ariff, Mohamed、Khaild, Ahmed M.(2000)。Liberalization, Growth and the Asian Financial Crisis。Liberalization, Growth and the Asian Financial Crisis。Cheltenham, UK。
22.
(2000)。The Asia Crisis: The Cures, Their Effectiveness and the Prospects After。The Asia Crisis: The Cures, Their Effectiveness and the Prospects After。London, UK。
23.
Woo, Wing Thye、Sachs, Jeffrey D.、Schwab, Klaus(2000)。The Asian Financial Crisis: Lessons for a Resilient Asia。MIT Press。
24.
(2000)。The Causes and Impact of the Asian Financial Crisis。The Causes and Impact of the Asian Financial Crisis。London, UK。
25.
(2002)。Managing Economic Development in Asia: From Economic Miracle to Financial Crisis。Managing Economic Development in Asia: From Economic Miracle to Financial Crisis。London, UK。
26.
(2003)。Southeast Asian Paper Tigers? from Miracle to Debacle and Beyond。Southeast Asian Paper Tigers? from Miracle to Debacle and Beyond。London, UK。
27.
Schedler, Andreas(1999)。Conceptaulizing Accountability。The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies。Boulder, CO。
28.
朱雲漢(1999)。Surviving the East Asian Financial Storm: The Political Foundation of Taiwan's Economic Resilience。Politics of the Asian Economic Crisis。Ithaca, NY。
29.
Naughton, Tony(2000)。Taiwan: An Island State with Economic Insulation。The Causes and Impact of the Asian Financial Crisis。London, UK。
30.
陳添枝(2001)。Weathering the Asian Financial Crisis: The Experience of Taiwan。Beyond the Asian Crisis: Pathways to Sustainable Growth。Cheltenham, UK。
其他
1.
薛承泰(2004)。老人照顧老人 將是臺灣現象,http://ntu.edu.tw/~psc_news9312/120701.htm, 20041207。
延伸查詢
2.
(2004)。法務部執行「掃除黑金行動方案」成效統計,0。
延伸查詢
3.
(2005)。金融機構家數統計,0。
延伸查詢
4.
(2005)。金融機構逾放比率,0。
延伸查詢
5.
沈中華(2002)。金融重建基金必須透明化及有監督機制,0。
延伸查詢
6.
臺灣證券交易所(2002)。歷年股票市場概況表年報,0。
延伸查詢
7.
Freedom House(2005)。Freedom of the Press,http://www.freedomhouse.org/Templatecfm?page=274, 2008/01/27。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
獨立機關治理結構與過程之研究
2.
臺灣金融機構間的薪資差異:農漁會信用部vs.其他金融機構
3.
陳水扁時期的臺灣政商關係--少數政府、個人化網絡與金融改革
4.
政治力對金融體系的干預:臺灣本土型金融風暴與重建
5.
九七金融風暴與南韓政經體制的轉變:超越發展國家論
6.
臺灣政商關係的演變:歷史制度論分析
7.
二00一年泰國大選的政經分析
8.
Differential Impact of the Foreign Exchange Crisis on Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea: A Politico-Institutional Explanation
1.
台灣、泰國與馬來西亞金融改革的政治分析:制度透明化與問責
1.
有錢大家賺?民主化對台灣金融體系的影響
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code