:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:公共選擇途徑下官僚行為理論之實證研究--以臺北市政府「政府線上申辦服務政策」為例
書刊名:考銓季刊
作者:吳宗憲 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Chuang-Hsien
出版日期:2007
卷期:51
頁次:頁113-134
主題關鍵詞:公共選擇理論官僚行為新公共行政預算最大化Public choice theoryBureaucratic behaviorHew public administrationBudget maximizing
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:24
  • 點閱點閱:37
期刊論文
1.Dougan, W. R.、Kenyon, D. A.(1988)。Press Groups and Public Expenditures: The Flypaper Effect Reconsidered。Economic Inquiry,26,159-170。  new window
2.Sigelman, L.(1986)。The Bureaucrat as Budget Maximizer: An Assumption Examined。Public Budgeting and Finance,6(1),50-59。  new window
3.Margolis, J.(1975)。Comment on Niskanen Bureaucrats and Politicians。Jour- nal of Law and Economics,18,645-659。  new window
4.Migue, J. L.、Belanger, G.(1974)。Towards a General Theory of Managerial Discretion。Public Choice,17,27-43。  new window
5.Conybeare, John A. C.(1984)。Public Goods, Prisoners' Dilemmas and the International Political Economy。International Studies Quarterly,28(1),5-22。  new window
6.蔡玫芬(19970100)。公共選擇途徑對官僚的行為模式分析介紹。公共行政學報政大,1,239-255。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Chang, C. K.、Turnbull, G. K.(2002)。aucratic behavior in the local public sector: A revealed preference approach。Public Choice,113,191-209。  new window
8.Leloup, L. T.、Moreland, W. B.(1978)。Agency strategies and executive review: The hidden politics of budgeting。Public Administration Review,38,232-239。  new window
9.Rainey, H. C.(1983)。Public agencies and private firms: Incentive structures, goals, and individual roles。Administration and Society,15,207-242。  new window
10.曾冠球(20040600)。基層官僚人員裁量行為之初探:以臺北市區公所組織為例。行政暨政策學報,38,95-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.徐仁輝(19960500)。制度與官僚的預算行為。空大行政學報,5,43-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Moe, Terry M.(1984)。The New Economics of Organization。American Journal of Political Science,28(4),739-777。  new window
13.Wise, Lois Recascino(2004)。Bureaucratic posture: On the need for a composite theory of bureaucratic behavior。Public Administration Review,64(6),669-680。  new window
14.吳秀光、林水波、魏鏞(19980100)。由理性抉擇途徑談行政革新。公共行政學報,2,191-213+215-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Romer, T.、Rosenthal, H.(1984)。Voting Models and Empirical Evidence。American Scientist,72,465-473。  new window
16.Dolan, J.(2002)。The Budget-Minimizing Bureaucrat: Empirical Evidence from the Senior Executive Service。Public Administration Review,62(1),42-50。  new window
圖書
1.Stevens, J. B.(1993)。The Economics of Collective Choice。Boulder, CO。  new window
2.方福前(1990)。公共選擇理論:政治的經濟學。北京:中國人民大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Green、Shapiro、袁瑞軍、徐湘林(1990)。理性選擇理論的病變:政治學應用批判。香港:牛津大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Breton, A.、Wintrobe, D.(1982)。The logic of bureaucratic contruct。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Dubin, R.(1978)。Theory Building。New York:The Free Press。  new window
6.Niskanen, W.(1971)。Bureaucracy and representative government。Chicago:Rand McNally。  new window
7.Peacock, Alan(1992)。Public choice analysis in historical perspective。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Lipsky, M.(1980)。Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas o f the individual in public services。New York:Russell Sage Foundation。  new window
9.Bates, R. H、Greif, A、Levi, M、Rosenthal, J. L(1998)。Analytic narratives。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
10.North, Douglass C.(1990)。Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
11.Tullock, Gordon(1965)。The Politics of Bureaucracy。Washington, DC:Public Affairs Press。  new window
12.Wilson, James Q.(1989)。Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do it?。Basic Books。  new window
13.Downs, Anthony(1967)。Inside Bureaucracy。Boston, MA:Little, Brown and Company。  new window
14.Herzberg, Frederich(1966)。Work and the nature of man。The World Publishing Co.。  new window
15.Mueller, Dennis C.(1989)。Public Choice II: A Revised Edition of Public Choice。Cambridge University Press。  new window
16.Peters, B. G.(1978)。The Politics of Bureaucracy: A Comparative Perspective。New York:Longman。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kogan, M.(1973)。Comment on Niskanen Bureaucracy。Bureaucracy: Servant or Master?。London:Institute of Economic Affairs。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE