:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:企業智財經營平臺評選決策模式之建立--模糊群體決策理論應用
書刊名:管理與系統
作者:王平 引用關係羅濟群 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, PingLo, Chi-chun
出版日期:2007
卷期:14:3
頁次:頁435-458
主題關鍵詞:智慧財產直覺式模糊集合模糊排序敏感性分析IPIntuitionistic fuzzy setFuzzy rankingSensitivity analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:17
隨著知識經濟的發展,智慧財產研發成為企業競爭中重要的考量,現有的專利管理工具,著重於專利引用分析及專利申請管理;其缺乏專利保護、專利鑑價、技術授權等功能,針對企業智財管理中所需專利投資組合及技術發展預測亦無法支援。因此,組織要有效積極專利管理,須選擇一個合適的「智財管理經營平台 (Intellectual patent Management System, IPMS)」。目前已有數位學者運用模糊多屬性決策理論,進行軟體平台的評選,但傳統模糊邏輯要求決策者,針對各評估準則給予固定區間 (正面信心度) 的答案;但在專案評選初期,因資訊不完整,經常無法針對兩兩準則相對重要性給予評分,故本研究引進直覺式模糊集合 (Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set, IFS),以提供決策者表達對問題的正面與負面信心度;此外,本研究介紹一個新的方案綜合滿意指標,整合所有決策者的滿意度 (concord) 及不滿意度 (discord),以強化現有模糊排序法的鑑別能力,並運用敏感性分析加以驗證。最後舉一高科技單位的IPMS評選案例,進行方案綜合評鑑。由案例驗證得知,面對不完整資訊情況下,本模式可有效放寬決策者在不確定意見的表達,強化方案排序的鑑別能力。
The research and development of Intellectual Property (IP) becomes a significant concern for competition among enterprises increasing along with the popularity of knowledge-based economy. Current IP management systems mainly focus on analyzing patent citation and managing patent application, which might be neglect to identify the protection, valuation and licensing issues for patent assets, and also not to be fitting well for predicting investment portfolio and tendency of technology development. To effectively handle the patent management, enterprise needs to select an appropriate IPMS (IP Management System). Many researches have studied the selection issues of software platform. In general, the traditional fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making theory is employed to select software platform, which constraints the decision makers to express their ratings or scorings with positive confidence interval. However, decision makers often cannot discriminate the importance of criteria pairwise with incomplete information in the early stage of project development. In this paper, a new scheme for right selection of IPMS which exploits Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set (IFS) to assign their ratings based on decision maker’s positive and negative confidence. Then, an improved fuzzy ranking index is introduced to enhance the discrimination of current approach, which aggregates both concord and discord degree to calculate the synthetic alternative’s satisfaction degree for all decision makers. Furthermore, it is verified by the sensitivity analysis. Finally, a real case of IPMS selection for Hi-Tech organization is given to illustrate our approach. From the results of computations, this model not only can relax the expression of uncertainty of decision makers, but also improve the discrimination of current IFS ranking approach under incomplete information.
期刊論文
1.Bustince, H.、Burillo, P.(1996)。Vague Sets Are Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,79(3),403-405。  new window
2.Zadeh, L. A.(1983)。A Computational Approach to Fuzzy Quantifiers in Natural Languages。Computers and Mathematics,9,149-184。  new window
3.Chen, S.-M.(1995)。Measures of Similarity between Vague Sets。Fussy Sets and Systems,74,217-223。  new window
4.Atanassov, K.(1994)。New Operations Defined over Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,61,137-142。  new window
5.Atanassov, K.、Gargov, G.(1990)。Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic, C.R。C.R. Acad. Bulgare Sc.,43(3),9-12。  new window
6.Atanassov, K. T.(1989)。More on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,33,37-46。  new window
7.Reimann, B. C.、Waren, A. D.(1985)。User-oriented Criteria for the Selection of DSS Software。Communications of the ACM,28(2),166-179。  new window
8.Hong, D. H.、Choi, C. H.(2000)。Multicriteria Fuzzy Decision-making Problems Based on Vague Set Theory。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,114(1),103-113。  new window
9.Chen, S. M.、Tan, J. M.(1994)。Handling Multicriteria Fuzzy Decision-making Problems Based on Vague Set Theory。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,67(2),163-172。  new window
10.De, S. K.、Biswas, R.、Roy, A. R.(2001)。An Application of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets in Medical Diagnosis。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,117,209-213。  new window
11.Atanassov, K. T.(1986)。Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,20(1),87-96。  new window
12.Chen, Chen-Tung(2000)。Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-making under Fuzzy Environment。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,114(1),1-9。  new window
會議論文
1.蔡惠言(2004)。專利與科技產業。台北科技大學專利檢索與分析應用研討會。經濟部智慧財產局。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2004)。張忠謀:台灣必須積極創造價值。前瞻2004全球經濟趨勢高峰會,(會議日期: 民國93年2月25日)。  延伸查詢new window
3.Illa, X. B.、France, X.、Pastor, J. A.(2000)。Formalising ERP Selection Criteria。The 10th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design。San Diego, California。115-122。  new window
4.Kontio, J.(1996)。A Case Study in Applying a Systematic Method for COTS Selection。The 18th International Conference on Software Engineering,201-210。  new window
學位論文
1.張世明(2004)。高科技公司建立智慧財產權管理準則之研究(碩士論文)。義守大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.馬麗莎(2005)。應用模糊層級分析法之知識產業績效評估模式--以大學評鑑系統為例(碩士論文)。大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.王重凱(2005)。知識密集服務業之智慧資本評估之研究(碩士論文)。大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林建仲(2005)。多準則決策分析於知識管理系統發展改進方針之研究(碩士論文)。玄奘大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.張浩鈞(2000)。質化多準則評估方法及其有效性之衡量(碩士論文)。華梵大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.林明緯(2003)。專利分析與專利投資組合建構--以半導體系統單晶片技術為例(碩士論文)。元智大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Saaty, T. L.(1980)。The Analytic Process。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
2.Hwang, C. L.、Yoon, K.(1981)。Multiple attribute decision making:Methods and applications。Berlin:Heidelberg:New York:Springer-Verlag。  new window
3.麥克‧波特、李明軒、邱如美(1998)。國家競爭優勢。天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Chen, S. J. J.、Hwang, C. L.(1992)。Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications。Springer-Verlag。  new window
其他
1.連穎科技(2005)。智慧財產權管理與企業專利管理平台簡報。  延伸查詢new window
2.亞太智財(2005)。企業智財經營平台介紹。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE