:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民中小學校長變革領導模式之建構
書刊名:初等教育學刊
作者:張素偵
作者(外文):Chang, Su-Chen
出版日期:2007
卷期:27
頁次:頁25-70
主題關鍵詞:校長變革領導校長變革領導模式變革領導Change leadershipPrincipal's change leadershipPrincipal's change leadership model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(11) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:700
  • 點閱點閱:46
「國民中小學校長變革領導之研究」旨在透過對當前國民中小學校長變革領導情境、變革領導者與變革領導行為內涵、變革領導評鑑與回饋等文獻分析,結合校長變革領導之成功實務經驗,以建構符合國情之國民中小學校長變革領導模式,最後提出結論與建議,俾供教育行政單位、國民中小學及其校長進行變革領導決策與執行之參考。 為達成研究目的,本研究在資料蒐集上採用訪談法、觀察法及焦點團體法,在資料的分析上採用內容分析法,訪談對象為臺北縣市十三位變革領導成功校長,觀察對象為十所變革成功學校,隨機訪談對象為四位教職員工、十二位學生、四位家長、十三位社區人士,焦點團體對象為五位對國民中小學校長變革領導主題學有專精之學者,經前導式研究、試訪、正式訪談、專家諮詢座談等步驟,三次修正模式,最後形成「國民中小學校長變革領導模式」,簡稱「愛得福模式」(ARDOF model),並獲致以下研究結論: 一、「國民中小學校長變革領導模式」包括變革覺察 (awareness) 、變革準備 (readiness) 、變革領導作為 (doings) 、變革結果 (outcome) 、回饋 (feedback) 等五個階段。 二、「國民中小學校長變革領導模式」具有系統、演化與持續改進等特性。 三、「國民中小學校長變革領導模式」是歷程、策略、系統、人員、循環等模式之綜合體。 四、受訪校長對教改政策、家長負面意見及學校弱點,其有深度的覺察。 五、受訪校長在變革之前,都會進行變革診斷客觀分析、妥善部署變革動力、確定變革方向、概念化自己的領導角色。 六、受訪校長的變革領導行為著重於變革策略的擬定、變革計畫的執行與檢討分析,惟對具體作法規畫與評鑑標準設定較少著墨。 七、校長變革領導之後,包括預期結果、正面非預期結果與負面非預期結果三種。 八、多數校長重視變革回饋中的修正,但較少提及制度化與持續變革。 依據研究結論本研究提出具體建議,以供校長、教育行政機關及未來研究之參考。
The purpose of this study is to construct a model of the principal's change leadership in elementary and junior high school. The study was conducted by interview, observation, focus group, and content analysis. Thirteen successful change-leading principals selected from Taipei City and Taipei County were interviewed, including two principals for pilot study, one for pilot interview, and ten for the interview. The subjects of observation were ten interviewed principals' schools. Four staff, twelve students, four parents, and thirteen community residents were randomly interviewed. Five experts in issues of elementary and junior high school principal's change leadership were invited to offer opinions about the model. The research data were collected by means of interview, observation, and focus group. Content analysis was used to explore the offered information of the ten interviewed principals. The ARDOF model was constructed after pilot study, pilot interview, interview, and panel discussion. Based on research findings, its conclusions are as follows: 1. The ARDOF model includes awareness, readiness, doings, outcome, and feedback stages. 2. System, evolution, and improvement are three characteristics of the model. 3. The ARDOF model is the synthesis of process model, strategic model, systems model, personal model, and cycle model. 4. The interviewed principals perceived educational reform politics, parents' negative opinions, and school weaknesses much more deeply. 5. Before the implementation of change the interviewed principals have objectively analyzed change, well initiated the change motives of staff, confirmed change direction, and conceptualized their leadership roles. 6. The draft of change strategies, the implementation of change plans, and the analysis of review were the major parts of the interviewed principals' conduct of change leadership. But the details of implementation and the setting of evaluation standards were less emphasized. 7. The practice of principals' change leadership included intended, positive unintended, and negative unintended outcomes. 8. Most principals valued the revision of change feedback, but they mentioned less the institutionalization and sustaining of the changes. Based on the research results, the author provides feasible recommendations for references to school principals, educational agencies, and for further investigations on related topics.
期刊論文
1.吳宗立(19990700)。從民族性格論中國式行政領導行為。教育資料與研究,29,40-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Ireh, M.、Bailey, J.(1999)。A study of superintendents' change leadership styles using the situational leadership model。American Secondary Education,27(4),22-32。  new window
3.林明地(20021200)。學校社區化在理念與實踐上的發展趨勢。教育資料集刊,27,259-280。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Nightingale, P.、Ibbetson, A.、Pugh, R.(2003)。An evaluation of the impact of a multidisciplinary educational event focusing on teamwork and leadership skills in primary care。Education for Primary Care,14,345-355。  new window
5.張德銳(20000400)。我國中小學學校組織變革的新方向。初等教育學刊,8,279-296。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.楊振昇(1995)。提升國小校長的教學領導正是時候--寫在國小新課程標準實施之前。師友,341,51-55。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳清山、林天祐(2001)。教學領導。教育資料與研究,43。  延伸查詢new window
8.謝金青(20040300)。跨文化的領導觀點--家長式領導的概念與回顧。教育研究,119,41-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.吳清山、林天祐(1998)。教育名詞:轉型領導、互易領導。教育資料與研究,24,63-64。  延伸查詢new window
10.Miller, N.(2002)。Insider change leadership in schools。International Journal of Leadership in Education,5(4),343-360。  new window
11.陳木金(19990500)。混沌理論對學校組織變革因應策略之啟示。學校行政,1,61-68。  延伸查詢new window
12.高義展(19990700)。中國式權變領導之研究--「龍椅」領導哲學之初構。教育研究(高師),7,45-56。  延伸查詢new window
13.張明輝(19970600)。學校組織的變革及其因應策略。教育研究集刊,38,2-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.吳清山、林天祐(2002)。教育名詞:道德領導。教育研究月刊,98。  延伸查詢new window
15.蔡進雄(20040300)。學校轉型領導的理論與實際。教育研究,119,53-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.楊振昇(2003)。教學領導與教師專業發展。教育資料集刊,28,287-318。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.張明輝(20040300)。幾項領導新議題對學校領導的啟示。教育研究月刊,119,26-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.黃乃熒(20011000)。從學校組織權力弔詭管理觀點建構學校組織變革模式。師大學報.教育類,46(2),145-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.郭木山(20030700)。談教育變革中校長教學領導的角色與做法。教育資料與研究,53,90-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.吳百祿(20020900)。願景領導的探討。學校行政,21,3-11。  延伸查詢new window
21.鄭新輝(20040300)。後教育集權化時代,地方教育行政機關應有的職能與領導角色。教育研究月刊,119,80-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.張明輝(19990100)。九○年代主要企業組織理論與學校行政革新。教育研究集刊,42,155-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.王恭志(2002)。從團體動力談小學教師班級經營策略。研習資訊,19(5),88-96。  延伸查詢new window
24.司徒達賢(2003)。當高等教育走向開放系統。現代教育論壇,8,52-59。  延伸查詢new window
25.李玉惠(2001)。從團體動力談學校行政領導的革新。學校行政雙月刊,11,51-65。  延伸查詢new window
26.陳木金(2001)。從學校系統理論看九年一貫新課程的實施。學校行政,7,17-31。  延伸查詢new window
27.葉子超(2000)。道德領導在國民中小學教育之運用。學校行政雙月刊,5,23-29。  延伸查詢new window
28.羅虞村(1990)。從社會系統理論談學校組織發展的主要策略。教師天地,46,38-44。  延伸查詢new window
29.譚以敬和張素偵(2004)。國內教育輿情。教育資料與研究,56,124-129。  延伸查詢new window
30.譚以敬和張素偵(2004)。國內教育輿情。教育資料與研究,57,109-113。  延伸查詢new window
31.譚以敬和張素偵(2004)。國內教育輿情。教育資料與研究,58,135-141。  延伸查詢new window
32.譚以敬和張素偵(2004)。國內教育輿情。教育資料與研究,59,128-133。  延伸查詢new window
33.譚以敬和張素偵(2004)。國內教育輿情。教育資料與研究,60,128-132。  延伸查詢new window
34.譚以敬和張素偵(2004)。國內教育輿情。教育資料與研究,61,108-114。  延伸查詢new window
35.Williams, T., Sims, J., Burkhead, C.,、Ward, P. M.(2002)。The creation, implementation, and evaluation of a nurse residency program through a shared leadership model in the intensive care setting。Dimentions of Critical Care Nursing,21(4),154-161。  new window
會議論文
1.張明輝(1997)。學校組織的變革與教育品質。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳木金(2000)。從混沌理論談邁向新世紀的學校行政。  延伸查詢new window
3.謝文豪(1999)。學校行政管理的發展趨勢:因應組織的變革需要137-157。  延伸查詢new window
4.謝文豪(2002)。學校本位課程之實施與校長變革領導能力之發展。臺北市。379-388。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李宏才(2003)。混沌理論應用在國小校長危機管理之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Matthew, C. T.(2005)。Creativity as a predictor of leading change in organizations(博士論文)。Columbia University,New York。  new window
3.Wirth, R. A.(2004)。The relationship between self-leadership and self-initiatedchange Leadership: Personal empowerment for emergent organizational change,Minneapolis。  new window
4.陳朝福(2003)。組織轉型研究--新科學典範的創造性演化觀點(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學,台北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳佳渝(2003)。我國大學校院校長轉型領導與領導效能之研究(碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
6.王心怡(2002)。國中校長情緒智力、轉型領導風格與辦學績效之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳春助(2001)。國民小學校長學校行政混沌現象敏銳度與學校組織文化塑造關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
8.吳耀堂(2002)。國民小學組織變革與學校行政決策滿意度之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
9.林怡秀(1999)。國民小學課程統整模式之研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院,花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃登木(2004)。「服務領導」在學校組織的應用與基本模式初探(碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新北市。  延伸查詢new window
11.林郁絲(2000)。組織變革中國民小學教師角色壓力之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院,台中市。  延伸查詢new window
12.蔡文杰(2001)。國民小學學校經營混沌現象敏銳度及組織權力關係重建之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
13.張賜光(2003)。桃園縣國中校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
14.陳建東(2001)。國民小學組織變革與學校效能關係之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
15.劉麗蓉(2002)。國民小學教師專業角色知覺與學校組織變革接受度之關係(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
16.鍾志長(2005)。校長之變革領導與教師革新關注之研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
17.杜岐旺(2001)。國民小學學校組織變革與學校效能相關之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
18.胡士琳(2003)。學校行政體系之微觀政治現象研究--以一所國民中學為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
19.李玉惠(2003)。國民中學學校革新的社會動力研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.戴雪卿(2003)。國民中學學校組織變革內涵及其變革抗拒之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
21.張昭仁(2001)。國小校長轉型領導、互易領導與學校組織學習能力關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
22.黃傳永(1999)。校長轉型領導與家長參與學校教育之研究(碩士論文)。國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
23.梁丁財(2001)。國民小學校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
24.徐崇嵐(2003)。「鄉土」如何論戰?一個場域與權力的分析(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
25.蔡榮福(2003)。國民中學學校組織文化與組織變革支持度之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
26.邵俊豪(2002)。臺北市國民中學校長轉型領導、交易領導與學校本位管理決策類型之關係研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
27.濮世緯(2003)。國小校長轉型領導、學校文化取向與學校創新經營關係之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.廖裕月(1998)。國小校長轉化領導型式與領導效能之研究:以北部四縣市為例(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
29.張毓芳(2002)。台北縣市國民小學校長轉型領導與學校組織氣氛關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
30.蔡進雄(2000)。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.李佳玲(2006)。以系統動力學探討卓越企業信念對組織績效的影響-以赫門 米勒公司為例,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
32.林志成(1989)。動機理論對提振國民中小學教師士氣之啟示,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
33.陳清章(2006)。運用結構方程模式探討領導型態、組織文化、全面品質管理以及組織承諾之關係-以塑膠製造業為例,花蓮縣。  延伸查詢new window
34.劉代豪(1996)。組織變革過程中內部抗拒之管理與變革績效關係之研究-以組織推動ISO9000系列認證為例,桃園縣。  延伸查詢new window
35.鄭淑惠(2000)。國民中學組織發展之研究,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
36.羅世輝(1999)。以系統動力學探討競爭性技術主流突現之動態性過程,高雄市。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.Choi, Y.(1995)。A theory of self-sacrificial leadership,Lawrence, KS。  new window
38.Gatteau, R. J.(2000)。Breaking barriers in higher education: An exploration of female presidential leadership at six institutions,New York。  new window
39.Hall, D. K.(2001)。The complexity of change consciousness: A challenge for public school leadership at the local campus level,TX。  new window
40.Hurley, V. M.(2001)。Establishing the level playing field: Implementation of Section 504, Rehabilitation Act of 1973,New York。  new window
41.Lopez, M.(2003)。The behaviors of effective urban school principals,CO。  new window
42.McGill, M. K.(1997)。An investigation of early adopters of technological innovation on selected Michigan elementary schools,MI。  new window
43.Monroe, M. J.(1997)。Leadership of organizational change: Antecedents and implications,TX。  new window
44.Sheppard, L. B.(1993)。A study of the relationship among instructional leadership behavior of the school principal and selected school-level characteristics,Ontario, Canada。  new window
45.Toole, J. C.(2002)。Mental models, professional learning community, and the deep structure of school improvement: Case studies of service-learning,MN。  new window
46.Williams, H. W.(2004)。A study of the characteristics that distinguish outstanding urban principals: Emotional intelligence, problem-solving competencies, role perception and environmental adaptation,OH。  new window
圖書
1.Covey, Stephen R.(2004)。The 8th Habit: From Effectiveness to Greatness。Free Press。  new window
2.Owen, J. M.(2003)。Evaluating educational programs and projects in Austtralia。International handbook of educational evaluation: Practice。Norwell, MA:Kluwer Academic。  new window
3.Cohen, Michael D.、March, James G.、Olsen, Johan(1974)。Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President。Boston:Harvard Business Press。  new window
4.Beer, M.、Eisenstat, R.、Spector, B. A.(1990)。The Critical Path to Corporate Renewal。Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press。  new window
5.Beare, H., Caldwell, B. J.,、Millikan, R. H.(1992)。A model for managing an excellent school。Managing change in education: Individual and organizational perspectives。London:Paul Chapman。  new window
6.Sergiovanni, T. J.(2002)。Leadership: What's in it for schools?。Routledge。  new window
7.Charan, Ram、Bossidy, Larry、李明(2003)。執行力。臺北市:天下遠見出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Stacy, R. D.(1992)。Managing the Unknowable。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
9.Snowden, P. E.,、Gorton, R. A.(2002)。School leadership & administration--Important concepts, case studies & simulations。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
10.高子梅(譯)、J. M. Kouzes、B. Z. Posner(原作者)(2004)。模範領導。臺北市:臉譜。  延伸查詢new window
11.Block, P.(1987)。The empowered manager。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
12.Greenberg, J.、張善智、謝馥蔓(2000)。組織行為。臺北市:學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
13.Steinbach, Rosanne、Leithwood, Kenneth、Jantzi, Doris(2000)。Changing Leadership for Changing Times。Philadelphia, PA:Open University Press。  new window
14.Robbins, S. P.、李青芬、趙慕芬(2001)。組織行為學。臺北市:華泰文化。  延伸查詢new window
15.Greenberg, J.、Baron, R. A.(2000)。Behavior in organizations: Understanding and managing the human side of work。New Jersey:Prentice Hall。  new window
16.Luecke, R.(2003)。Managing Change and Transition。Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press。  new window
17.Kotter, John P.、周旭華(2000)。變革--哈佛商業評論。臺北:天下遠見出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.Goldring, E. B.、Rallis, S. F.(1993)。Principals of dynamic schools: Taking charge of change。Newbury Park, CA:Corwin Press。  new window
19.謝文全(1997)。教育行政理論與實務--實務篇。臺北:文景出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.葉玉珠(2003)。教育心理學。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
21.Worthen, B. R.、Sanders, J. R.、Fitzpatrick, J. L.(1997)。Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines。New York:Addison Wesley Longman。  new window
22.Koch, R.(1998)。The 80/20 Principle: The Secret of Achieving More with Less。New York, NY:Currency。  new window
23.Nias, J.、Southworth, G.、Campbell, P.(1992)。Whole school curriculum development in the primary school。Falmer Press。  new window
24.Collins, Jim、齊若蘭(2002)。從A到A+。臺北:遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.Fullan, M. G.(1992)。Successful school improvement: The implementation perspective and beyond。Open University Press。  new window
26.Sallis, E.、Jones, G.(2002)。Knowledge management in education: Enhancing learning and education。London:Biddles。  new window
27.Holsti, Ole R.(1969)。Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities。Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.。  new window
28.Gardner, H.、Laskin, E.(1995)。Leading Minds: An anatomy of leadership。New York:Basic Books。  new window
29.Sergiovanni, T. J.(1992)。Moral Leadership。San Francisco, California:Jossey-Bass。  new window
30.張春興(1995)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
31.郭生玉(1996)。心理與教育研究法。精華書局。  延伸查詢new window
32.秦夢群(1998)。教育行政:理論部份。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
33.Lunenburg, F. C.、Ornstein, A. C.(1996)。Educational administration: Concepts and practices。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Publishing Company。  new window
34.曾淑惠(2002)。教育方案評鑑。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
35.Robbins, S. P.(1998)。Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, applications。NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
36.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
37.黃昆輝(1988)。教育行政學。東華。  延伸查詢new window
38.Cummings, T. G.、Huse, Edgar F.(1989)。Organization Development and Change。St. Paul, Minn:West Publishing Company。  new window
39.Deal, Terrence E.、Peterson, Kent D.(1994)。The leadership paradox: Balancing logic and artistry in Schools。Jossey-Bass。  new window
40.Sergiovanni, Thomas J.(1995)。The principalship: A reflective practice perspective。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
41.Blanchard, K.、Hodges, P.、何修瑜(2004)。僕人領導。臺北:商周。  延伸查詢new window
42.羅虞村(1986)。領導理論研究。臺北市:文景出版社。  延伸查詢new window
43.四一○教育改造聯盟(1996)。民間教育改造藍圖:朝向社會正義的結構性變革。臺北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
44.張德銳(2000)。教育行政研究。臺北市:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.Bass, Bernard M.(1985)。Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations。Free Press。  new window
46.Bass, B. M.、Avolio, B. J.(1990)。Transportational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire。Consulting Psychologists Press。  new window
47.秦夢群(2000)。教育行政:理論部分。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
48.林明地(2002)。校長學:工作分析與角色研究取向。五南。  延伸查詢new window
49.潘正德(1999)。團體動力學。臺北市:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
50.Senge, Peter、郭進隆、齊若蘭(1990)。第五項修練:學習型組織的藝術與實務。台北:天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
51.Owens, Robert G.、Follette, Mary Parker、Munsterberg, Hugo、林明地、楊振昇、江芳盛(2000)。教育組織行為。揚智。  延伸查詢new window
52.Burns, James MacGregor(1978)。Leadership。Harper & Row。  new window
53.Lewin, Kurt、Cartwright, Dorwin(1951)。Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers。Harper & Row。  new window
54.Collins, Jim C.(2001)。Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap... and Others Don't。New York:Harper Business。  new window
55.方永泉(2000)。信念。教育大辭書(第五冊)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
56.但昭偉(2000)。本質。教育大辭書(第二冊)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
57.吳定(1984)。組織發展理論技術。臺北市:天一圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
58.吳清山(2002)。學校行政(第五版)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
59.洪有義(2000)。團體凝聚力。教育大辭書。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
60.范瑞薇(譯)、(原作者)P. F. Drucker、P. Paschek(2005)。杜拉克談領導未來。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
61.徐炳勳(譯)、S. R. Covey(原作者)(2005)。與領導有約(四版二刷)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
62.高秀娟(譯)、D. Cottrell(原作者)(2005)。週一清晨的領導課。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
63.張建成(2000)。團體動力學。教育大辭書(第九冊)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
64.張潤書(1987)。行政學(再增訂再版)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
65.許燕(2005)。讀歷史學管理。臺北縣:富育國際。  延伸查詢new window
66.陳千玉(譯)、E. H. Schein(原作者)(2003)。組織文化與領導(初版四刷)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
67.黃昆輝和張德銳(2000)。組織變革。教育大辭書(第七冊)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
68.黃昆輝和張德銳(2000)。組織文化。教育大辭書(第七冊)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
69.楊振昇(2001)。教育行政領導理論。教育行政。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
70.蘇哲仁和林家五(譯)、A. Miller、G. G. Dess(原作者)(2002)。策略管理(三刷)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
71.Bennett, N.、Crawford, M.、Cartwright, M.(2003)。Effective educational leadership。London:Paul Chapman。  new window
72.Bennett, N., Crawford, M.,、Riches, C.(1992)。Managing change in education: Individual and organizational perspectives。London。  new window
73.Champy, J.(1995)。Reengineering management。New York。  new window
74.Fullan, M.(1993)。Change force: Probing the depths of education reform。London:Falmer。  new window
75.Fullan, M.(1996)。Leadership for change。International handbook of educational leadership and administration。Dordrecht, The Netherlands。  new window
76.Goodlad, J., Soder, R.,、Sirotnik, K. A. Eds.(1990)。The moral dimentions of teaching。San Francisco, CA。  new window
77.Hackman, J. R.(1986)。The psychology of self-management in organizations。Psychology and work: Productivity, change, and employment。Washington, DC。  new window
78.Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H.,、Johnson, D. E.(1996)。Management of organizational behavior (7th ed.)。Upper Saddle River, NJ。  new window
79.Kotter, J. P.,、Schlesinger, L. A.(1983)。Choosing strategies for change。Perspectives on behavior in organization。New York。  new window
80.March, J. G.(1984)。How we talk and how we act: Administrative theory and administrative life。Leadership and organizational culture。Urbana, IL。  new window
81.Maxwell, J. C.(1998)。The irrefutable laws of leadership。Nashville, TN:Thomas Nelson。  new window
82.Nanus, B.(1992)。Visionnary leadership。San Francisco。  new window
83.Neufeldt, V.(1994)。Webster’s new world dictionary。New York。  new window
84.Patterson, J.(1993)。Leadership for tomorrow’s schools。Alexandria, VA。  new window
85.Rogers, G.,、Badham, L.(1992)。Evaluation in schools: Getting started on training and implementation。New York。  new window
86.Sirotnik, K. A.(1990)。Society, schooling, teaching, and preparing to teach。The moral dimentions of teaching。San Francisco。  new window
87.Stankard, M. F.(2002)。Management systems and organizational performance。Westport, CT。  new window
其他
1.蔡焜霖總策劃(2000)。牛津當代大辭典(第四版第二刷),臺北市:旺文社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Smith, R.(2001)。Principles of modeling,http://www.modelbenders.com/。  new window
3.段德智,尹大貽和金常政(譯),P. A. Angeles(原作者)(2001)。哲學辭典(三刷),臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Stufflebeam, D. L.(2003)。Institutionalizing evaluation in schools。International handbook of educational evaluation: Part Two: Practice。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
2.Quatro, S. A.、Hoekstra, E.、Gilley, J. W.(2002)。Holistic model for change agent excellence: Core roles and competencies for successful change agency。Changing the way we manage change。Westport, CT:Quorum Books。  new window
3.張明輝(1997)。學校組織變革與領導。學校教育革新專輯。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE