:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:科學寫作融入野外探究教學之研究
書刊名:教育研究與發展期刊
作者:蘇明俊 引用關係羅豪章
作者(外文):Su, Ming-jinLo, Hao-chang
出版日期:2007
卷期:3:2
頁次:頁163-188
主題關鍵詞:五段式科學寫作引導多元評量科學寫作野外探究教學Field-based inquiryFive-stage science writing guideMultiple assessmentScience writing
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:89
  諸多相關研究及文獻顯示,融入科學寫作的教學,有助於學生科學學習;結合野外教學和科學探究的野外探究教學,讓學習者得以在自然真實的情境中學習科學,也讓科學學習更活潑生動。本研究旨在探討如何將科學寫作融入野外探究教學之中,並評估在野外探究教學中,以科學寫作作為多元評量工具的適切性。在連續四年(2001年至2004年)舉辦野外探究教學歷程中,研究團隊以行動研究的方式發現,將科學寫作融入野外探究教學的過程中,學生在進行心得寫作時,無法順利地將其學習成果透過作文方式呈現出來,因此研究團隊發展出五段式科學寫作引導模式,透過破題、描述、延伸、加強以及結論五個階段的寫作引導,協助學生在野外探究學習活動中進行心得寫作。經由研究證實:透過此科學寫作模式,確能有效協助學生在野外探究教學活動中進行心得寫作。此外,根據科學寫作的觀點,分析學生於野外探究教學中所撰寫的心得寫作發現,活動所安排的心得寫作對受測學生而言難度適中,且具有鑑別學生科學寫作能力高低的作用,教學者也可以透過心得寫作瞭解到學生在認知、情意、技能三個領域教學目標的學習情形,顯示以心得寫作做為野外探究教學的多元評量工具,確具其適切性。最後,本文亦針對後續研究及教學推廣提出若干的建議。
  According to the literature, incorporating science writing in science teaching is helpful for science learning. Field-based inquiry teaching, a combination of field teaching and science inquiry, creates authentic circumstances in nature for students to learn science. This paper aims to discuss how to incorporate science writing in field-based inquiry teaching and evaluate the applicability of using science writing as a tool for multiple assessments in field-based inquiry teaching. Field-based inquiry teaching activities for this research were conducted from 2001 to 2004. The research team found that in the first two years students who participated in the activities could not finish their tasks. The researchers believed that it was necessary to provide a framework of writing in teaching activities. Hence, the team developed a strategy, called “five-stage science writing guide”, that includes introduction, description, expansion, strengthening, and conclusion. The results indicated that students could complete science writing for field-based inquiry activities using the framework of writing given by the writing guide. The analysis of the students’ writing about what they had learned in field –based inquiry proved that the difficulty level of the writing was appropriate and demonstrated the students’ writing capability and their viewpoints of science. This kind of science writing is also an appropriate tool for multiple assessments because it can assess student learning in cognitive, affective, and skill domains. Some suggestions for further research and educational expansion are also proposed.
期刊論文
1.Rivard, L. P.(1994)。A Review of Writing to Learn in Science: Implications for Practice and Research。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,31(9),969-983。  new window
2.羅廷瑛、張景媛(20040600)。科學寫作活動的知識建構對國小學生自然科學習效果之影響。教育心理學報,35(4),337-354。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳慧娟(19981200)。科學寫作有效促進概念改變的教學策略。中等教育,49(6),123-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Mason, L.(2001)。Introducing talk and writing for conceptual change: a classroom study。Learning and Instruction,11(4),305-329。  new window
5.蘇明俊、江新合(20040600)。歸納式野外探究教學模式。新竹師院學報,18,323-361。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Miller, L. D.(1991)。Writing to Learn Mathematics。Mathematics Teacher,84(7),516-521。  new window
7.Roid, G. H.(1994)。Patterns of writing skills derived from cluster analysis of direct-writing assessments。Applied Measurement in Education,7(2),159-170。  new window
8.Flower, Linda、Hayes, John R.(1981)。A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing。Research in the Teaching of English,15(3),329-343。  new window
9.劉祥通、周立勳(19970600)。數學寫作活動--國小數學教學的溝通工具。國民教育研究學報,3,239-261。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Bieger, E. M.(1995)。Promoting multicultural education through a literature-based approach。The Reading Teacher,49(4),308-12。  new window
11.Hildebrand, G. M.(1998)。Disrupting hegemonic writing practices in school science: Contesting the right way to write。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,35(4),345-362。  new window
12.Klein, P. D.(2000)。Elementary student’s strategies for writing-to-learn in science。Cognition and Instruction,18(3),317-348。  new window
13.Levine, T.、Geldman-Caspar, Z.(1996)。Informal science writing produced by boys and girls: Writing preference and quality。British Educational Research Journal,22(4),421-439。  new window
14.Mason, L.,、Boscolo, P.(2000)。Writing and conceptual change. What changes?。Instructional Science,28,199-26。  new window
15.Rohman, D. G.(1965)。Prewriting, the stage of discovery in the writing process。College Composition and Communication,16,106-122。  new window
16.Soter, A. O.(1987)。Recent research on writing: Implications for writing across the curriculum。Journal of Curriculum Studies,19,425-438。  new window
會議論文
1.Foster, G.(1984)。Technical writing and science writing. Is there a difference and what does it matter?。New York City, USA。29-31。  new window
學位論文
1.蘇明俊(2004)。野外探究教學模式之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Huang, Y. C.(1999)。A study of reformulation relations in scientific reports,Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC。  new window
圖書
1.Trice, A. D.(2000)。A Handbook of Classroom Assessment。Don Mills, Canada:Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.。  new window
2.Bloom, B. S.、Engelhart, M. D.、Furst, E. J.、Hill, W. H.、Krathwohl, D. R.(1956)。Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook 1, Cognitive domain。New York:Longman。  new window
3.Simpson, E. J.(1972)。The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain。Washington, DC:Gryphon House。  new window
4.Bryman, Alan、Cramer, Duncan(1997)。Quantitative data analysis with SPPS for windows: A guide for social scientists。Routledge。  new window
5.Bereiter, Carl、Scardamalia, Marlene(1987)。The Psychology of Written Composition。Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
6.Noll, Victor H.、Scannell, Dale P.、Craig, Robert C.(1979)。Introduction to educational measurement。Houghton Mifflin Harcourt。  new window
7.Krathwohl, David R.、Bloom, Benjamin S.、Masia, Bertram B.(1964)。Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals--Handbook II: Affective domain。New York, NY:David McKay Company, Incorporated。  new window
8.教育部(1998)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
9.Ebel, R. L.(1979)。Essentials of educational measurement。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
10.Ahmann, J. Stanley、Glock, Marvin David(1981)。Evaluating Student Progress: Principles of Tests and Measurements。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
11.Nunnally, Jum C.、Bernstein, Ira H.(1978)。Psychometric Theory。McGraw-Hill。  new window
12.胡瑞萍、林陳涌(2003)。寫作與科學學習。科學課程論述。  延伸查詢new window
13.郭金美、蕭登峰(2003)。探討啟發式科學寫作融入教學對學童科學概念學習與改變之研究-以氧化概念學習為例。科學課程論述。  延伸查詢new window
14.Arkle, S.(1985)。Better Writers, Better Thinkers。Roots in the Sawdust: Writing to Learn Across the Disciplines。Urbana, IL。  new window
15.Britton, J.(1970)。Language and Learning。New York。  new window
16.Britton, J.(1978)。The composing process and the functions of writing。Research on composing: Points of depature。Urbana, III。  new window
17.Bruer, J.(1999)。Schools for Thought。Boston。  new window
18.Carter, P. L., Ogle, P. K.,、Royer, L. B.(1993)。Learning logs: What are they and how do we use them?。Assessment in the mathematics classroom。Reston, VA。  new window
19.Champagne, A. B.(1996)。Assessment and science curriculum design。National Standards and the Science Curriculum: Challenges, Opportunities,and Recommendations。Colorado Springs, CO。  new window
20.Champagne, A. B.,、Kouba, V. L.(1999)。Writing to Inquiry: Written Products as Performance Measures。Assessing Science Understanding: A Human Constructivist View。  new window
21.Draper, V.(1979)。Formative writing: writing to assist learning in all subject area (curriculum publication No.3)。Berkeley。  new window
22.Elbow, P.(1974)。Writing Without Teachers。NY。  new window
23.Kulm, G..(1994)。Mathematics assessment: What works in tile classroom。San Francisco, CA。  new window
24.Lindemann, E.(1995)。A Rhetoric for Writing Teachers。Oxford。  new window
25.Prain, V.,、Hand, B.(1995)。Writing and Learning in Science: the Constructivist Classroom。Sydney。  new window
26.Reeves, D.(2000)。Accountability in Action。Denver。  new window
27.Santa, C. M.、Havens, L.T.(1991)。Learning through writing。Science Learning: Processes and Applications。Newark。  new window
圖書論文
1.Krashen, Stephen D.(1977)。The monitor model for adult second language performance。Viewpoint on English as a Second Language。New York:Regents Publishing。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE