國際政治與國內政治互動之評析__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	國際政治與國內政治互動之評析
書刊名：	歐洲國際評論
作者：	劉蕭翔
作者(外文)：	Liou, Shiau-shyang
出版日期：	2007
卷期：	3
頁次：	頁107-136
主題關鍵詞：	國際政治；國內政治；層次分析；International politics；Domestic politics；Level analysis
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:0 點閱:25

國際政治與國內政治彼此影響且聯繫的現象，自有國家之始即已存在，諸如由國內層次至國際層次－「外交係內政的延長」，亦或反向由國際層次對國內政治的影響，無不解釋此一根本現象的存在。國際政治與國內政治之屬性同屬「政治」，故可以相同的概念與範疇理解之。再者，今日相關研究的議題亦不在於兩層次間是否有所區別，而在於如何研究其間模糊的互動關係。蓋因在全球化的浪潮下，國際生活眾多領域均呈現高度機制化現象，而在國家內部也也可能出現無政府狀態，所以，國際與國內層次已不再絕對地涇渭分明。自古勒維奇於其「反饋的第二意象」說明國際政治亦為國內政治之因，兩者間呈雙向關係，在分析時應將兩者視為一體後，隨著國際情勢的變化，國際關係學界亦呈現百家爭鳴的狀態，許多理論不斷地推陳出新，其間對於所謂的「層次」或「意象」亦有眾多的討論；儘管如此，就國際關係裡國內政治與國際政治互動此一根本現象的研究與解釋，卻一直未能有突破性的發展，即便是自詡為最具普遍性與解釋力的結構現實主義亦有其不足之處。多年來，學界中亦有為數不少的經典著作出現，但這些推陳出新的概念仍僅只被作為一種「象徵」而運用，距離真正的實際操作仍相當遙遠本文擬就古勒維奇、普特南與卡普斯坦等三位學者的經典著述作－檢視回顧，並嘗試對其立論作－回應，希冀能於此－議題有所貢獻。

以文找文

The interactions and linkages between international politics and domestic politics have existed since states build, such as “diplomacy is internal affairs' prolongation”: from domestic level to international level, or reversed direction: the international politics' influence on domestic politics; all of them are used for explaining this fundamental phenomenon. Both attributes of international politics and domestic politics belong to “politics”, so we can realize them with the same concepts and categories. Furthermore, contemporary related researches already don’t focus on whether distinction between international and domestic politics exists or not, but on how to research the ambiguous interactions between them. Within the globalization, many fields in international politics already present high institutionalization, besides anarchy may emerge internally within a state, so distinction between international level and domestic level are not entirely different. Since Peter Gourevitch interpreted international politics is also the source of domestic politics and explained a two-way relationship between them in his classic thesis: “The second image reversed”, the scholars of international relations have competed to contend their arguments with the dynamics of international situation. Many theories found new ways to reconstruct themselves, meanwhile, there were also many discussions about “level” or “image”. However, the researches and explanations about the fundamental phenomenon of interaction between international and domestic levels still have no breakthrough, even though structural realism. As times goes on, many classical theses appear, but these reconstructed or new concepts are still exerted as a “metaphor”, still distant from practical operation. This thesis wants to review these classical theses of Peter Gourevitch, Robert Putnam and Ethan Kapstein, and tries to respond to their arguments, wishes to make some contributions in this field.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Kapstein, Ethan B.(1995)。Is realism dead? The domestic sources of international politics。International Organization，49(4)，751-774。
2.	Haggard, Stephan(1988)。The Institutional Foundations of Hegemony: Explaining the Reciprocal Trade Agreement Act of 1934。International Organization，42(1)，91-119。
3.	Tobern, Iversen、Anne, Wren。Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint-the Trilemma of the Service Economy。World Politics，50(4)，507-546。
4.	Geoffrey, Garrett、Peter, Lange(1991)。Political Responses to Interdependence: What’s ‘Left’ for the Left?。International Organization，45(4)，539-564。
5.	Kurth, James(1971)。The Widening Gyre: The Logic of American Weapons Procurement。Public Policy，19(3)，373-404。
6.	Fearon, James D.(1994)。Domestic Political Audiences and Escalation of International Disputes。American Political Science Review，88(3)，577-592。
7.	Schultz, Kenneth A.(1999)。Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War。International Organization，53(2)，233-266。
8.	MacIntyre, Andrew J.(2001)。Institutions and Investors: The Politics of the Economic Crisis in Southeast Asia。International Organization，55(1)，81-122。
9.	Gourevitch, Peter(1978)。The Second Image Reversed: The International Source of Domestic Politics。International Organization，32(4)，881-912。
10.	Lebow ,Richard Ned(1994)。The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War, and the Failure of Realism。International Organization，48(2)，249-277。
11.	North, Douglass C.、Weingast, Barry R.(1989)。Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England。The Journal of Economic History，49(4)，803-832。
12.	Christensen, Thomas J.、Snyder, Jack(1990)。Chain Gangs and Passed Bucks: Predicting Alliance Patterns in Multipolarity。International Organization，44(2)，137-168。
13.	Gourevitch, Peter Alexis(1978)。The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics。International Organization，32(4)，881-912。
14.	De Mesquita, Bruce Bueno、Morrow, James D.、Siverson, Randolph M.、Smith, Alastair(1999)。An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace。American Political Science Review，93(4)，791-807。
15.	Putnam, Robert David(1988)。Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games。International Organization，42(3)，427-460。
16.	de Mesquita, Bruce Bueno、Morrow, James D.、Siverson, Randolph M.、Smith, Alastair(1999)。Policy Failure and Political Survival: The Contribution of Political Institutions。Journal of Conflict Resolution，43(2)，147-161。

圖書
1.	Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Joseph S.(1977)。Power and Interdependence。Boston：Little, Brown & Company。
2.	Morse, Edward(1976)。Modernization and the Transformation of International Relations。New York：Free Press。
3.	Snyder, Jack(1991)。Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition。Ithaca, N.Y.：Cornell University Press。
4.	Gourevitch。Domestic Politics and International Relations。
5.	Magee, Stephen P.、Brock, William A.、Young, L.(1989)。Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory: Political Economy in General Equilibrium。Cambridge University Press。
6.	Gourevitch。Domestic Politics and International Relations。
7.	Hall, Peter A.、David, Soskice(2001)。Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Capitalism。Oxford：Oxford University Press。
8.	Gourevitch。Domestic Politics and International Relations。
9.	Kehr, Eckart(1977)。Economic Interest, Militarism, and Foreign Policy: Essay onGermany History。Berkeley：University of California Press。
10.	Jack, Snyder(1991)。Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition。Ithaca, N.Y.：Cornell University Press。
11.	Roeder, Philip G.(1993)。Sunset: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance。Princeton：Princeton University Press。
12.	Andrew, Moravcsik(1998)。The Choice of Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht。Ithaca：Cornell University Press。
13.	Cowles, Maria Green、James, Caporaso、Thomas, Risse(2001)。Transforming Europe。Cornell：Cornell University Press。
14.	Gourevitch。Domestic Politics and International Relations。
15.	Rogowski, Ronald(1989)。Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments。Princeton：Princeton University Press。
16.	Gourevitch, Peter Alexis(1986)。Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises。Cornell University Press。
17.	Richard, Rosecrance、Stein, Arthur A.(1993)。The Domestic Bases of Grand Strategy。Ithaca, N.Y.：Cornell University Press。
18.	Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce B.、Lalman, David D.(1992)。War and Reason: Domestic and International Imperatives。New Haven：Yale University Press。
19.	Waltz, Kenneth N.(1979)。Theory of International Politics。McGraw Hill。
20.	Wallerstein, Immanuel(1974)。The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century。New York：Academic Press。
21.	Allison, Graham T.(1971)。Essence of Decision: Explaining The Cuban Missile Crisis。Boston：Little, Brown and Company。
22.	Huntington, Samuel Phillips(1996)。The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order。Simon & Schuster Company, Inc.。
23.	Martin, Lisa L.(2000)。Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation。Princeton：Princeton University Press。
24.	Shirk, Susan L.(1993)。The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China。University of California Press。
25.	Esping-Andersen, Gøsta(1999)。Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies。Oxford University Press。

單篇論文
1.	Gourevitch(1977)。Domestic Politics and International Relation。

圖書論文
1.	Hintze, Otto(1975)。Military Organization and the Organization of the State。The Historical Essays of Otto Hintze。New York：Oxford。
2.	Young, Oran(1994)。The Perils of Odysseus: On Constructing Theories of International Relations。Theory and Policy in International Relations。Princeton University Press。
3.	Arthur, Stein(1938)。Domestic Constraints, Extended Deterrence, and the Incoherence of Grand Strategy。The Domestic Bases of Grand Strategy。
4.	Richard, Rosecrance、Steiner, Zara。British Grand Strategy and the Origin s of World War II。The Domestic Bases of Grand Strategy。
5.	Evangelista, Matthew。Internal and External Constraints on Grand Strategy: The Soviet Case。The Domestic Bases of Grand Strategy。
6.	Miles, Kahler。Evolution, Choice and International Change。Strategic Choice and International Relations。Princeton：Princeton University Press。
7.	Gourevitch, Peter A.(2002)。Domestic Politics and International Relations。Handbook of International Relations。Sage。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	雙重賽局與愛爾蘭批准歐盟里斯本條約

無相關博士論文

1.	俄屬遠東黃禍論：身分、利益的解構與建構

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫