美國與中國的FTA經濟戰略之比較分析__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	美國與中國的FTA經濟戰略之比較分析
書刊名：	思與言
作者：	洪財隆
作者(外文)：	Hong, Honigmann Tsai-lung
出版日期：	2007
卷期：	45:2
頁次：	頁133-179
主題關鍵詞：	自由貿易協定；區域主義；貿易政策；經濟手段；骨牌效應；FTA；Free Trade Agreement；Regionalism；Trade policy；Economic statecraft；Domino effect
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:0 點閱:29

Baldwin(1993)以「骨牌效應」來解釋當前全球的FTA蔓延現象，不僅相當生動，也是貫穿本文的主要理論依據。研究旨趣在於透過「貿易政策」與「經濟手段」的分析視角，比較研究美國跟中國近來的貿易政策思維與如何運用FTA作為經濟戰略，並據以蠡測其對兩岸關係的可能影響。
美國是國際經貿規則的制定或倡議者，NAFTA之建立即扮演了推動此波全球FTA洽簽風潮的始作俑者，並正式確立了「雙軌貿易政策」。然而，美國在全球是FTA的「領導者」，在東亞地區則唯恐被「邊緣化」而轉為「防衛性」角色。對中國而言，近年來隨著束亞區域主義興起，加上原先的多邊主義與單邊主義，三大貿易政策乃逐漸到位。值此同時，中國經濟崛起加上經貿體制異常開放，導致周邊國家紛紛成為重要經貿伙伴，配合國際政經情勢等有利因素，在在為中國提供了絕佳的區域舞台。雖然中國在全球是FTA風潮的「追隨者」，但在東亞地區則有轉為「領導者」的態勢。
在美台FTA持續沒有進展的情況下，美國之更積極參與東亞FTA賽局，結果可能反而對台灣不利。而本身說具有排他特性的FTA，也已成為中國孤立台灣的新工具。亦即美國與中國的FTA政策，不管有無意圖實質上已形成「邊緣化」台灣的壓力，而此一態勢當會增加台灣對兩岸（經貿）關係正常化的需求。

以文找文

This paper explores the characteristics of trade policy in US and China and highlights their FTA strategies in terms of economic statecraft, especially their implications for the cross-strait relationships.
US is the most important initiator of international trading system. The establishment of NAFTA in 1994 served as the catalyst for the recent regionalism. US is the leader in FTA globally, however, US has left behind the trade arrangements in East Asia, such as ‘ASEAN plus one” and “ASEAN plus three.” In this sense, US plays the defensive role or a follower in East Asia.
All three trade policies now are available for China as the surge of regionalism in East Asia (bilateralism, FT A for example), the entrance into WTO in 2001 (multilateralism), and the reform and opening (unilateralism) since 1978 as well as the membership of APEC (concerted unilateralism) in 1991. Meanwhile, the rise of China combined with its high openness in terms of trade and FDI has made China become an important trading partner for neighboring countries. It paves therefore the way for China to become a potential leader in East Asian regionalism, compared with its role as a follower in the global FTA games.
Under the threat of exclusion in East Asian regionalism, US has launched more FTAs plans in this area in a more active way. However, Taiwan seems to be ignored, despite US has singed an FT A with Taiwan's competitor South Korea. Moreover, China seems to finds the FTA as the new instrument to isolate Taiwan in international arena. This paper concludes that both FTA policy of US and China might well marginalize Taiwan, whose demand for normalization of cross-strait economic relationships might increase.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Baldwin, Richard E.(2006)。Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade。The World Economy，29(11)，1451-1518。
2.	Keohane, Robert O.(1986)。Reciprocity in International Relations。International Organization，40(1)，1-27。
3.	Bonapace, T.、Mikic, M.(2005)。Multilateralizing Regionalism: Towards an Integrated and Outward-oriented Asia- Pacific Economic Area presented at Macao。China Delivering on the WTO Round: A High-level Government-Business Dialogue for Development，4-6。
4.	Fernández, Raquel and Portes(1998)。Returns to Regionalism: An Analysis of Nontraditional Gains from Regional Trade Agreements。The World Bank Economic Review，12(2)，197-220。

圖書
1.	Legrain, Philippe(2002)。Open World: The Truth about Globalization。London：Abacus。
2.	Lardy, Nicholas R.(2002)。Integrating China into the Global Economy。Washington, DC：Brooking Institution Press。
3.	Lawrence, Robert(1996)。Regionalism, Multilateralism, and Deeper Integration。Washington, DC：Brookings Institution。
4.	Viner, Jacob(1950)。The Customs Union Issue。New York：Cornegie Endowment for International Peace。
5.	Steil, Benn、Litan, Robert E.(2006)。Financial Statecraft-The Role of Financial Markets in American Foreign Policy。Yale University Press。
6.	Hirschman, Albert O.(1980)。National power and the structure of foreign trade。University of California Press。
7.	Destler, Irving M.(2005)。American Trade Politics。Peterson Institute for International Economics。
8.	吳敬璉(2005)。當代中國經濟改革：探索中國經濟順利轉型的秘密。美商麥格羅．希羅國際股份有限公司臺灣分公司。延伸查詢

其他
1.	田中青(2005)。倡導和推動東亞區域合作，北京：中共中央黨校出版社。延伸查詢
2.	洪財隆(200503)。美國選擇自由貿易協定對象的考慮因素。延伸查詢
3.	洪財隆(200705)。亞太自由貿易區（FTAAP）的經濟效應、策略性角色與可行性分析。延伸查詢
4.	張蘊嶺、陸建人(1997)。中國的APEC政策與作用，北京：經濟管理出版社。延伸查詢
5.	Athukorla, P. ; Yamashita, N.(20050225)。Production Fragmentation and Trade Integration: East Asia in a Global Context，Claremont, CA, USA：Claremont McKenna College。
6.	Baldwin, Richard(1993)。A Domino Effect of Regionalism，Cambridge：MIT Press。
7.	Bhagwati, J.(1996)。The US-Japan Car Dispute。
8.	Bhagwati, S.(200501)。Reshaping the WTO。
9.	Bergsten, C. Fred(1996)。Competitive Liberalization and Global Free Trade: A Vision for the Early 21st Century，Washington：Institute for International Economics。
10.	Bergsten, C. Fred(2004)。Toward a Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific，Santiago, Chile。
11.	Cai, Peng-Hong(2006)。East Asian New Regionalism and China. prepared for the Third Annual CEPII-IDB Conference，Washington DC.。
12.	Cheng, Leonard K. ; Kierzkowski, Henry(2001)。Global Production and Trade in East Asia。
13.	Either, Wilfred(199807)。The New Regionalism。
14.	Fujita, Masahisa(2007)。Development of East Asian Regional Economices: A View from Spatial Economics，IDE-JETRO, Palgrave Macmillan。
15.	Fujita, Masahisa, Nobuaki Hamauuchi(2006)。The Coming Age of China-plus-One: The Japanese Perspective on East Asian Production Networks。
16.	Guillaume Gaulier, Françoise Lemoine and Deniz Ünal-Kesenci(2006)。China's Remergence and the Reorganization of Trade Flows in Asia。
17.	Hale, D.(2006)。In the Balance: China's Unprecedented Growth and Implications for the Asia-Pacific，Australian Strategic Policy Institute。
18.	Holmes, John(2000)。Regional Economic Integration in Noth America，Oxford Uni. Press。
19.	Hufbauer, G. C. and Wong, Yee(2005)。Prospects for Regional Free Trade in Asia，Washingtion DC。
20.	Ianchovichina, E. ; Martin, W.(200306)。Economic Impacts of China's Accession to the World Trade Organization。
21.	Irwin, A. Douglas(20070409)。GAIT Turns 60。
22.	Majlut J. A.(2004)。Swimming in the Spaghetti Bowl: Challenges for Developing Countries under ' New Regionalism'，Geneva：UNCTAD。
23.	Martin Wolf(2004)。Why Globalization Works，Yale University Press。
24.	Panagariya, Arvind(2000)。Preferential Trade Liberalization: The Traditional Theory and New Developments。
25.	Sally, Razeen(2006)。China's Trade Policies in Wider Asian Perspective，World Scientific Publishing Co.。
26.	Schott, Jeffiey(2004)。Assessing US FTA Policy，Institute for International Economics。
27.	Sheng Bin(2006)。The Political Economy of an Asia Pacific Free Trade Area-China Perspective。
28.	Terada, Takashi(2006)。The Making of Asia's First Bilateral FTA: Origins and Regional Implications of the Japan-Singapore Economic Partnership Agreement。
29.	Tkacik, J. J.(20041201)。A Fresh Start for America's Asian Policy。
30.	Whalley, J.(1992)。Regional Trade Arrangements in North America: CUSTA and NAFTA。
31.	Whalley, J.(1998)。Why Do Countries Seek Regional Trade Agreements，The University of Chicago Press。
32.	Winham, G. R.(1994)。NAFTA and the Trade Policy Revolution of the 1980s: a Canadian Perspective。
33.	WIR(2006)。World Investment Report, UNCTAD。
34.	WTO(2005)。The Erosion of Non-discrimination。
35.	Zhang, Yun-Ling (張蘊嶺)(2005)。The Future Perspective of East Asian FTA。

圖書論文
1.	Bhagwati, Jagdish(1993)。Regionalism and Multilateralism: An Overview。New Dimensions in Regional Integration。New York：Cambridge University Press。
2.	Krugman, Paul(1991)。Is Bilateralism Bad?。International Trade and Trade Policy。Cambridge, Massachusetts：MIT Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	從經濟治略視角分析兩岸經貿團體交流：以「兩岸企業家峰會」為例
2.	韓國FTA之布局決策機制對我國的啟示
3.	論東亞區域主義之政治經濟動能
4.	A Critical Comparison of US and China's FTA Policy as an Economic Strategy

1.	泰國的自由貿易戰略之研究：1988-2023

1.	相對獲益與絕對獲益觀點下的東亞經濟合作

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫