:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:The Implications of U.S. Nuclear Strategy for Taiwan's Security
書刊名:東吳政治學報
作者:林泰和 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Taiho
出版日期:2007
卷期:25:2
頁次:頁123-177
主題關鍵詞:臺灣安全三角關係戰略模糊核子態勢評估核戰略Taiwan's securityTriangular relationsStrategic ambiguityNPRNuclear strategy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:33
本文探討美國未來核戰略對中國與台灣安全的影響。作者揚棄傳統「核子嚇阻」的觀念,而發展出一套分析架構對2001年美國「核子態勢評估」加以分析,這份報告將是未來美國核子武力與核戰略的指導方針。 美國「核子態勢評估」中主要包含攻擊的武器系統、飛彈防禦系統以及加強的核武基礎設施,這三大要素構成所謂新核武三元,取代傳統以陸基洲際飛彈、潛射洲際飛彈及戰略轟炸機所構成的舊核武三元。這種新戰略規劃的確使美國擁有更廣泛的軍事選項及更大的作戰彈性;但同時亦會引發核子風險。這種風險可能來自美中雙方的軍備競賽,危機不穩定性與先制攻擊。 因為任何美、中兩大核武國家的戰爭,都有可能導致核子武器的使用,進而引發核子戰爭,所以只要台灣一天持續成為美中軍事衝突的引爆點,這種核武風險將對台灣國家安全有負面的影響。美方的新核戰略與美台的軍事合作將導致中國採取更強勢的防衛政策,此時台灣的安全將因為缺乏美方清楚而堅定的防衛承諾而陷入危險。作者同時解釋美方「戰略模糊」的政策為何是一種戰略的謬誤,相對的,「戰略清晰」將會使台海的戰爭,甚至是核戰更有效的避免。
This article explores the long-term impacts of the current U.S. nuclear strategy on China and Taiwan. Instead of traditional concept of “nuclear deterrence”, the author develops a framework for analysis of the U.S. nuclear strategy based on the Nuclear Posture Review 2002, which will determine U.S. nuclear forces planning over the next five to ten years. This nuclear strategy, which is composed of the offence strike systems, missile defense systems, and refined infrastructure, does provide the United States a wide spectrum of military options and greater operational flexibility. Yet it may also incur nuclear risks that result from arms race, crisis instability, and preemption for both China and the United States. These nuclear risks would have negative implications for Taiwan’s national security insofar as Taiwan remains a flashpoint between China and the United States. While the Nuclear Posture Review 2002 and the intensification of U.S.-Taiwan military cooperation would lead China to undertake a more robust defense policy, Taiwan’s security would be endangered for lack of clear and firm defense commitment from the United States. The author explains why the U.S. policy of “strategic ambiguity” is a strategic fallacy. A war or even a nuclear war across the Taiwan Strait would be more successfully prevented by a policy of “strategic clarity.”
期刊論文
1.Roy, Denny(2003)。China's Reaction to American Predominance。Survival,45(3),57-78。  new window
2.Ikle, Fred Charles(1996)。The Second Coming of the Nuclear Age。Foreign Affairs,75(1),119-128。  new window
3.Glaser, Charles L.、Fetter, Steve(2001)。National Missile Defense and the Future of U.S. Nuclear Weapon Policy。International Security,26(1),40-92。  new window
4.Schweller, Randall L.(2004)。Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancitig。International Security,29(2),159-201。  new window
5.Powell, Robert(2003)。Nuclear Deterrence Theory, Nuclear Proliferation, and National Missile Defense。International Security,27(4),86-118。  new window
6.Wachman, Alan M.(20020300)。Credibility and the U.S. Defense of Taiwan: Nullifying the Notion of a "Taiwan Threat"。Issues & Studies,38(1),200-229。new window  new window
7.Christensen, Thomas J.(2001)。Posing Problems without Catching Up: China's Rise and Challenges for U.S. Security Policy。International Security,25(4),5-40。  new window
8.Leiber, Keir A.、Press, Dary G.(2006)。The End of MAD? The Nuclear Dimension of U.S. Primacy。International Security,30(4),7-44。  new window
9.Betts, Richard K.、Christensen, Thomas J.(2000)。China: Getting the Questions Right。The National Interest,62(winter),17-29。  new window
10.Fang, Hsu-hsiung(2004)。The Transformation of U.S.-Taiwan Military Relations。Orbis,48(3),551-561。  new window
11.Goldstein, Steven M.(2002)。The Taiwan Strait: A Continuing Status Quo of Deadlock?。Cambridge Review of International Affairs,15(1),85-94。  new window
12.Whiting, Allen S.(2001)。China's Use of Force, 1950-96, and Taiwan。International Security,26(2),103-131。  new window
13.Snyder, Glenn H.(1984)。The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics。World Politics,36(4),461-495。  new window
14.陳文賢(20031200)。The Triangular Relations between Taiwan, the U.S., and China at the Turn of the New Century。Issues & Studies,39(4),206-216。new window  new window
15.Manning, R. A.、Montaperto, R. N.、Roberts, Brad(2000)。China: The Forgotten Nuclear Power。Foreign Affairs,79(4),53-63。  new window
16.Preez, Jean Du(2002)。The Impact of the Nuclear Posture Review on the International Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime。The Nonproliferation Review,9(3),67-81。  new window
17.McDevitt, Michael(2000)。Beijing's Bind。The Washington Quarterly,23(3),177-186。  new window
18.Perkovich, George(2003)。Bush's Nuclear Revolution: A Regime Change in Nonproliferation。Foreign Affairs,82(2),2-8。  new window
19.Ward, Adam(2003)。China and America: Trouble Ahead?。Survival,45(3),35-56。  new window
20.Shambaugh, David(2005)。China Engages Asia。International Security,29(3),64-99。  new window
21.Dodge, Paul(2006)。Chinas Naval Strategy and Nuclear Weapons: The Risks of Intentional and Inadvertent Nuclear Escalation。Comparative Strategy,24,415-430。  new window
22.Johnston, Alastair Iain(1996)。China's New 'Old Thinking': The Concept of Limited Deterrence。International Security,20(3),5-42。  new window
23.Dodge, Paul(2004)。Circumventing See Power: Chinese Strategies to Deter U.S. Intervention in Taiwan。Comparative Strategy,23,391-409。  new window
24.Kane, Thomas M.(2004)。Dragon or Dinosaur? Nuclear Weapons in a Modernizing China。Parameters,33(4),98-113。  new window
25.Blair, Bruce G.(2005)。General Zhu and Chinese Nuclear Preemption。China Security,1(autumn),15-22。  new window
26.Gouré, Daniel(2003)。Nuclear Deterrence, Then and Now。Policy Review,116,22-24。  new window
27.Butfoy, Andrew(2002)。Perpetuating U.S. Nuclear 'First-Use' into the IndefiniteFuture: Reckless Inertia or Pillar of World Order?。Contemporary Security Strategy,149-169。  new window
28.(2007)。Playing the Other Woman。The Economist,382(January),53-54。  new window
29.McDevitt, Michael(2004)。The Security Situation across the Taiwan Strait: Challenges and Opportunities。Journal of Contemporary China,13(40),411-426。  new window
30.Bracken, Paul(2003)。The Structure of the Second Nuclear Age。Orbis,47(3),399-413。  new window
31.林泰和(2004)。Toward a Nuclear Peace in East Asia: Facing North Korea's Nuclear Reality。Journal of East Asian Affairs,18(1),49-77。  new window
32.Goldstein, Lyle J.(2003)。When China Was a 'Rouge State': The Impact of China's Nuclear Weapons Program on U.S.-China Relations during the 1960。Journal of Contemporary China,12(37),739-765。  new window
學位論文
1.Lübkemeier, Eckhard(1989)。Extended Deterrence: The American Nuclear Commitment to the Federal Republic of Germany,0。  new window
圖書
1.Department of Defense(2006)。Annual Report on the Military Power of the People's Republic of China。Washington, DC:Department of Defense。  new window
2.Kilgour, D. M.、Zagare, Frank C.(2000)。Perfect Deterrence。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Payne, Keith B.(1996)。Deterrence: in the Second Nuclear Age。The University Press of Kentucky。  new window
4.Schelling, Thomas C.(1960)。The Strategy of Conflict。Cambridge, Mass:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Schelling, Thomas C.(1966)。Arms and Influence。Yale University Press。  new window
6.Johnston, Alastair Iain(1995)。Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Stragtegy in Chinese History。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
7.Baldwin, David Allen(1985)。Economic Statecraft。Princeton University Press。  new window
8.Shulsky, Abram N.(2000)。Deterrence Theory and Chinese Behavior。RAND Press。  new window
9.Brodie, Bernard(1966)。Escalation and the Nuclear Option。Escalation and the Nuclear Option。Princeton, NJ。  new window
10.Osgood, Robert E.、Tucker, Robert W.(1967)。Force, Order, and Justice。Force, Order, and Justice。Baltimore, MD。  new window
11.Bottome, Edgar(1971)。The Balance of Terror: A Guide to the Arms Race。The Balance of Terror: A Guide to the Arms Race。Boston, MA。  new window
12.Snyder, Glenn H.(1975)。Deterrence and Defense: Toward A Theory of National Security。Deterrence and Defense: Toward A Theory of National Security。Westport, CT。  new window
13.Luttwak, Edward N.(2001)。Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace。Cambridge, MA:Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
14.Preez, Jean Du(2002)。The U.S. Nuclear Posture Review: International Perspectives and Implications。The U.S. Nuclear Posture Review: International Perspectives and Implications。Monterey, CA。  new window
15.Freedman, Lawrence(2003)。The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy。The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy。New York, NY。  new window
16.Roberts, Brad(2004)。China's Perception of the U.S. Nuclear Threat: A Post-NPR Survey。China's Perception of the U.S. Nuclear Threat: A Post-NPR Survey。Alexandria, VA。  new window
17.(2005)。China's Nuclear Force Modernization。China's Nuclear Force Modernization。Rhode Island, USA。  new window
18.(2006)。Hitting First-Preventive Force in U.S. Security Strategy。Hitting First-Preventive Force in U.S. Security Strategy。Pittsburgh, PA。  new window
19.Cliff, Roger(2007)。Entering the Dragon's Lair - Chinese Antiaccess Strategies and Their Implication for the United States。Entering the Dragon's Lair - Chinese Antiaccess Strategies and Their Implication for the United States。Santa Monica, CA。  new window
20.Yang, Huan(1998)。China's Strategic Nuclear Weapons。Chinese Views of Future Warfare。Washington, DC。  new window
21.Wu, Jianguo(1998)。Nuclear Shadows on High-Tech Warfare。Chinese Views of Future Warfare。Washington, DC。  new window
22.Wirtz, James J.(2000)。Beyond Bipolarity: Prospects for Nuclear Stability after the Cold War。The Absolute Weapons Revisited: Nuclear Arms and the Emerging International Order。Ann Arbor, MI。  new window
23.Waltz, Kenneth(2004)。Missile Defenses and the Multiplication of Nuclear Weapons。The Use of Force: Military Power and International Politics。Lanham, MD。  new window
24.Posen, Barry R.(2004)。The Sources of Military Doctrine。The Use of Force: Military Power and International Politics。Lanham, MD。  new window
25.McDonough, David(2006)。Nuclear Superiority: 'New Triad' and the Evolution of American Nuclear Strategy。Nuclear Superiority: 'New Triad' and the Evolution of American Nuclear Strategy。0。  new window
其他
1.Central Intelligence Agency(2001)。Foreign Missile Developments and the Ballistic Missile Threat Through 2015,http://www.cia.gov/nic/pubs/other_products/Unclassifiedballisticmissilefinal.pdf。  new window
2.Federation of American Scientists(19980715)。Executive Summary of the Report of the Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States,http://www. fas.org/irp/threat/missile/rumsfeld/toc.htm, 2010/02/03。  new window
3.Arms Control Association(2002)。Fact Sheet: Worldwide Ballistic Missile Inventories,0。  new window
4.The Whitehouse(2002)。National Security Strategy of the United States of America, September 2002 (NSS 2002),0。  new window
5.GlobalSecurity.org(2002)。Nuclear Posture Review (Excerpts),0。  new window
6.U. S. Department of Defense(2005)。Annual Report on the Military Power of the People's Republic of China,0。  new window
7.Lieggi, Stephanie(2005)。Going beyond the Stir: The Strategic Realities of China's No-First-Use Policy,0。  new window
8.Arkin, William(2006)。America's New China War Plan,0。  new window
9.Smith, Jack(2006)。Bush's War Plan includes the Use of Nuclear Weapons,0。  new window
10.The Bulletin Online(2006)。Chinese Nuclear Forces 2006: NRDC Nuclear Notebook 2006,0。  new window
11.Kristensen, Hans(2006)。Chinese Nuclear Forces and U.S. Nuclear War Planning,0。  new window
12.Bolkcom, Christopher(2006)。Conventional Forces and Nuclear Deterrence: A China Case Study, CRS Report for Congress,0。  new window
13.Dunn, Lewis(2006)。Foreign Perspectives on U.S. Nuclear Policy and Posture: Insights, Issues and Implications,0。  new window
14.U. S. Department of Defense(2006)。Quadrennial Defense Review Report (QDR) 2006,0。  new window
15.NATO(2007)。NATO's Positions Regarding Nuclear Non-Proliferation, Arms Control and Disarmament and Related Issues,0。  new window
16.The Bulletin Online(2007)。Russian Nuclear Forces 2007: NRDC Nuclear Notebook 2006,0。  new window
17.The Bulletin Online(2007)。U.S. Nuclear Forces 2007: NRDC Nuclear Notebook 2007,0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Tucker, Nancy Bernkopf(2005)。Strategic Ambiguity or Strategic Clarity?。Dangerous Strait: The U.S.-Taiwan-China Crisis。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE