探索國際關係理論的建橋計畫：理性主義與建構主義的理論綜合_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
引文資料

題名：	探索國際關係理論的建橋計畫：理性主義與建構主義的理論綜合
書刊名：	政治科學論叢
作者：	莫大華
作者(外文)：	Mo, Tahua
出版日期：	2007
卷期：	31
頁次：	頁175-215
主題關鍵詞：	國際關係理論；理性主義；建構主義；反思主義；Bridge-building projects；International relations theory；Rationalism；Constructivism；Reflectivism
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:4 共同引用:99 點閱:119

期刊論文
1.	Keohane, Robert O.(1988)。International Institutes: Two Approaches。International Studies Quarterly，32(4)，379-396。
2.	Sil, Rudra(2000)。The Foundations of Eclecticism: The Epistemological Status of Agency, Culture and Structure in Social Theory。Journal of Theoretical Politics，12(3)，353-387。
3.	Bieler, Andreas(2001)。Questioning Cognitivism and Constructivism in IR Theory: Reflections on the Material Structure of Ideas。Politics，21(2)，93-100。
4.	Smith, Steve、Hollis, Martin(1991)。Beware of Gurus: Structure and Action in International Relations。Review of International Studies，17(4)，393-410。
5.	Hollis, M.、Smith, S(1992)。Structure and Action: Further Comment。Review of International Studies，18(2)，187-188。
6.	Sterling-Folker, Jennifer(1997)。Realist Environment, Liberal Process, and Domestic-Level Variables。International Studies Quarterly，41(1)，1-25。
7.	Chernoff, Fred(2002)。Scientific Realism as a Meta-theory of International Politics。International Studies Quarterly，46(2)，189-207。
8.	Lapid, Yoself(1989)。The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivism Era。International Studies Quarterly，33(1)，235-254。
9.	Wendt, Alexander(1991)。Bridging the Theory/meta-theory Gap in International Relations。Review of International Studies，17(4)，369-398。
10.	Wendt, A.(2000)。On the Via Media: A Response to the Critics。Review of International Studies，26(1)，165-180。
11.	Christiansen, Thomas、Jorgensen, Knud Erik、Wiener, Antje(1999)。The Social Construction of Europe。Journal of European Public Policy，6(4)，528-544。
12.	Johnston, Alastair Iain(2005)。Conclusions and Extensions: Toward Mid-Range Theorizing and beyond Europe。International Organization，59(4)，1013-1044。
13.	Barkin, J. Samuel(2004)。Realist Constructivism and Realist-constructivisms。International Studies Review，6(2)，348-352。
14.	Risse, Thomas(2000)。"Let's Argue!": Communicative Action in World Politics。International Organization，54(1)，1-39。
15.	莊錦農、魏中平(19980600)。解釋與批判：論批判實存論的科學解釋觀。政治科學論叢，9，121-143。延伸查詢
16.	Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus、Nexon, Daniel H.(2004)。Constructivist Realism or Realist-Constructivism?。International Studies Review，6(2)，337-341。
17.	Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus、Nexon, D. H.、Sterling-Folker, J.、Mattern, J. B.、Lebow, Richard Ned、Barkin, J. Samuel(2004)。Bridging the Gap: Toward a Realist-Constructivist Dialogue。International Studies Review，6(2)，337-352。
18.	Lebow, Richard N.(200407)。Constructive Realism。International Studies Review，6(2)，346-348。
19.	Mattern, Janice Bially(2004)。Power in Realist-Constructivist Research。International Studies Review，6(2)，343-346。
20.	莫大華(2003)。理性主義與建構主義的辯論：國際關係理論的另一次大辯論？。政治科學論叢，19，113-138。延伸查詢
21.	莫大華(20020900)。國際關係「建構主義」的原型、分類與爭論--以Onuf、Kratochwil和Wendt的觀點為分析。問題與研究，41(5)，111-148。延伸查詢
22.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(1998)。The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory。World Politics，50(2)，324-348。
23.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2001)。From Meta-to Substantive Theory?: Social Constructivism and the Study of Europe。European Union Politics，2(2)，219-226。
24.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2001)。Constructivism and Integration Theory: Crash Landing or Safe Arrival?。European Union Politics，2(2)，240-249。
25.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2004)。Social Constructivisms in Global and European Politics: A Review Essay。Review of International Studies，30(2)，229-244。
26.	Doucet, Marc G.(1998)。Standing Nowhere (?): Navigating the Third Route on the Question of Foundation in International Theory。Millennium，28(2)，289-310。
27.	Katzenstein, Peter J.、Keohane, Robert、Krasner, Stephen(1998)。International Organization and the Study of World Politics。International Organization，52(2)，645-685。
28.	莫大華(19990900)。論國際關係理論中的建構主義。問題與研究，38(9)，93-109。延伸查詢
29.	Brooks, Stephen G.、Wohlforth, William C.(2001)。Power, Globalization, and the End of the Cold War: Reevaluating a Landmark Case for Ideas。International Security，25(3)，5-53。
30.	Guzzini, Stefano(2000)。A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations。European Journal of International Relations，6(2)，147-182。
31.	Ruggie, John Gerard(1998)。What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge。International Organization，52(4)，855-885。
32.	Price, Richard、Reus-Smit, Christian(1998)。Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism。European Journal of International Relations，4(3)，259-294。
33.	Adler, Emanuel(1997)。Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics。European Journal of International Relations，3(3)，319-363。
34.	Mearsheimer, John J.(1990)。Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War。International Security，15(1)，5-56。
35.	Patomäki, Heikki、Wight, Colin(2000)。After Postpositivism? The Promises of Critical Realism。International Studies Quarterly，44(2)，213-237。
36.	Sterling-Folker, Jennifer(2000)。Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared。International Studies Quarterly，44(1)，97-119。
37.	Wendt, Alexander E.(1992)。Anarchy is What States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics。International Organization，46(2)，391-425。
38.	Brooks, Stephen G.(1997)。Dueling Realisms。International Organization，51(3)，445-477。
39.	Mearsheimer, John J.(1994)。The False Promise of International Institutions。International Security，19(3)，5-49。
40.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(1997)。International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist- Constructivist Divide。European Journal of International Relations，3(4)，473-465。
41.	Hollis, Martin、Smith, Steve(1996)。A Response: Why Epistemology Matters in International Theory。Review of International Studies，22(1)，111-116。
42.	Alker, Hayward R.(2000)。On Learning from Wendt。Review of International Studies，26(1)，141-150。
43.	Frankel, Benjamin(1996)。Restating the Realist Case: An Introduction。Security Studies，5(3)，14-20。
44.	Hollis, Martin、Smith, Steve(1994)。Two Stories about Structure and Agency。Review of International Studies，20(3)，241-251。
45.	Hermann, Margaret G.(1998)。One Field, Many Perspectives: Building the Foundations for Dialogue。International Studies Quarterly，42(4)，605-624。
46.	Chan, Stephen、Jabri, Vivienne(1996)。The Ontologist Always Ring Twice: Two More Stories about Structure and Agency in Reply to Hollis and Smith。Review of International Studies，22(1)，107-110。
47.	Chan, Stephen(1998)。An Ontologist Strikes Back: A Further Response to Hollis and Smith。Review of International Studies，24(3)，441-443。
48.	Jupille, Joseph、Caporaso, James A.、Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2003)。Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union。Comparative Political Studies，31(1/2)，7-40。
49.	Kahler, Miles(1998)。Rationality in International Relations。International Organization，52(4)，919-942。
50.	Petrova, Margarita H.(2003)。The End of the Cold War: A Battle or Bridging Ground Between Rationalist and Ideational Approaches in International Relations?。European Journal of International Relations，9(1)，115-163。
51.	Pollack, Mark A.(2005)。Theorizing the European Union: International Organization, Domestic Polity, or Experiment in New Governance?。Annual Review of Political Science，8，357-398。
52.	莫大華(2006)。Alexander Wendt的建構主義及其批判。政治科學季評，11，1-4。延伸查詢
53.	沈清松(1997)。卡納普的建構方案與建構實在論。哲學雜誌，22，24-45。延伸查詢
54.	Moravcsik, Andrew(2001)。Bring Constructivist Integration Theory Out of the Clouds: Has It Landed Yet?。European Union Politics，2(2)，226-240。
55.	Wiener, Antje(2003)。Constructivism: The Limits of Bridging Gaps。Journal of International Relations and Development，6(3)，252-272。
56.	Cupchik, Gerald(2001)。Constructivist Realism: An Ontology that Encompasses Positivist and Constructivist Approach to the Social Science。Forum: Qualitative Social Research，2(1)。
57.	Cederman, Lars-Erik、Dasse, Christopher(2003)。Endogenizing Corporate Identities: Next Step in Constructivist IR Theory。European Journal of International Relations，9(1)，5-35。
58.	Palan, Ronen(2000)。Evaluating the Constructivism Critique in International Relations。Review of International Studies，26(4)，577-578。
59.	Keohane, Robert O.(2000)。Forum on Social Theory of International Politics。Review of International Studies，26(1)，123-180。
60.	Zurn, Michael、Checkel, Jeffrey T.、Zürn, Michael(2005)。Getting Socialized to Build Bridges: Constructivism and Rationalism, Europe and the Nation State。International Organization，59(4)，1045-1079。
61.	Patomäki, Heikki(1996)。How to Tell Better Stories about World Politics。European Journal of International Relations，2(1)，105-133。
62.	Sorensen, Georg(1998)。IR Theory after the Cold War。Review of International Studies，24(5)，86-92。
63.	Moravcsik, Andrew(1999)。Is Something Rotten in the State of Demark? Constructivism and European Integration。Journal of European Public Policy，6(4)，669-681。
64.	Wendt, Alexander(1992)。Levels of Analysis Vs. Agents and Structure: Part III。Review of International Studies，18(2)，181-185。
65.	Schweller, Randall L.、Wohlforth, William C.(2000)。Power Test: Evaluating Realism in Response to the End of the Cold War。Security Studies，9(3)，60-107。
66.	Sterling-Folker, Jennifer(2002)。Realism and the Constructivist Challenge: Rejecting, Reconstructing。International Studies Review，4(1)，73-97。
67.	Sterling-Folker, Jennifer(2004)。Realist-Constructivism and Morality。International Studies Review，6(2)，341-342。
68.	Brglez, Milan(2001)。Reconsidering Wendt's Meta-Theory: Blending Scientific Realism with Social Constructivism。Journal of International Relations and Development，4(4)，339-362。
69.	Smith, Steve(1999)。Social Constructivism and European Studies: A Reflectivist Critique。Journal of European Public Policy，6(4)，682-691。
70.	Weber, Martin(2005)。The Critical Social Theory of Frankfurt School, and the 'Social Turn' in IR。Review of International Studies，31(1)，195-209。
71.	Pouliot, Vincent(2004)。The Essence of Constructivism。Journal of International Relations and Development，7(3)，319-336。
72.	(2003)。The Forum: Are Dialogue and Synthesis Possible in International Relations?。International Studies Review，5(1)，123-153。
73.	Haacke, Jurgen(2005)。The Frankfurt School and International Relations: On the Centrality of Recognition。Review of International Studies，31(1)，181-194。
74.	Psillos, Stathis(2000)。The Present State of the Scientific Realism Debate。British Journal for Philosophy of Science，51(4)，705-728。
75.	Lapid, Yosef(2003)。Through Dialogue to Engaged Pluralism: The Unfinished Business of the Third Debate。International Studies Review，5(1)，128-130。

會議論文
1.	Marcel, Valerie(2001)。The Constructivist Debate; Bringing Hermeneutics (Properly)。the 2001 ISA conference，(會議日期: 21 February)。Hong Kong。
2.	Risse, Thomas(2000)。Rational Choice, Constructivism, and the Study of International Institutions。0。
3.	Hoffmann, Matthew J.(2005)。Constructivist Ethics as Oxymoron?。0。
4.	Guzzini, Stefano(2000)。Constructivist Social Theories Dealing with Reflexivity and Power: A Critical Reading of Luhmann。0。
5.	Wiener, Antje(2001)。Social Facts in World Politics-The Values-added of Constructivism。the 42nd Annual Convention of the International Studies Association，(會議日期: February 20-25)。Chicago。
6.	Wight, Colin(20011006)。Too Much Constructivism in Too Many Wor(l)ds。Workshop on (Re) Constructing Constructivist International Relations Research。Center for International Studies, University of South California。
7.	Gofas, Andreas(2002)。Structure, Agency and Intersubjectivity: Recapturing the EMU Policy Process in a Constructivist Realist Framework。0。
8.	Greve, Morten F.(2004)。Rationalism, Constructivism, and International Economic Institutions: Toward a New Research Agenda?。0。
9.	Aalberts, Tanja E.、Munster, Rens Van(2004)。Taking the Middle Ground Seriously: Towards a Communicative Approach to Social Inquiry。0。
10.	Leander, Anna(2004)。The Cunning of Imperialist Reason: Using a Bourdieu Inspired Constructivism in IPE。0。
11.	Pouliot, Vincent(2004)。Toward a Bourdieusian Constructivism in IR: Outline of a Theory of Practice of Security Communities。0。
12.	Katzenstein, Peter、Sil, Rudra(2005)。What Is Analytic Eclecticism and Why Do We Need It?: A Pragmatist Perspective on Problems and Mechanism in the Study of World Politics?。0。

研究報告
1.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2000)。Bridging the Rational-Choice/ Constructivist Gap? Theorizing Social Interaction in European Institutions。
2.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2005)。It's the Process Stupid! Process Tracing in the Study of European and International Politics。
3.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2006)。Constructivist Approaches to European Integration。
4.	Jupille, Joseph、Caporaso, James A.、Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2002)。Integrating Institutions: Theory, Method, and the Study of the European Union。沒有紀錄。
5.	Rieker, Pernille(2004)。EU Security Policy: Contrasting Rationalism and Social Constructivism。0。
6.	Checkel, Jeffrey T.(2003)。Social Constructivisms in Global and European Politics。0。

圖書
1.	Snyder, Jack(1991)。Myth of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition。Ithaca, NY：Cornell University Press。
2.	Wight, Martin、Wight, G.、Porter, B.(1991)。International Theory: The Three Traditions。London。
3.	Spegele, Roger D.(1996)。Political Realism in international Theory。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
4.	George, Jim(1994)。Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations。Boulder：Lynne Rienner Publishers。
5.	Guzzini, Stefano and Anna Leander,(2006)。Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics。Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics。New York, NY：Routledge。
6.	(2001)。Constructing International Relations: The Next Generation。New York, NY：M. E. Sharpe。
7.	Hollis, Martin、Smith, Steve(1990)。Explaining and Understanding International Relations。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。
8.	McSweeney, Bill(1999)。Security, Identity, and Interest: A Sociology of International Relations。Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press。
9.	Brown, Michael Edward、Lynn-Jones, Sean M.、Miller, Steven E.(1995)。The Perils of Anarchy: Contemporary Realism and International Security。The MIT Press。
10.	Burchill, Scott、Linklater, Andrew、Devetak, Richard、Paterson, Matthew、True, Jacqui(1996)。Theories of International Relations。New York：St. Martini Press, Inc.。
11.	Ruggie, John Gerard(1998)。Constructing the World Polity: Essays in International Institutionalization。Routledge。
12.	Christiansen, Thomas、Jørgensen, Knud Erik、Wiener, Antje(2001)。The Social Construction of Europe。Sage。
13.	Kuhn, Thomas S.、王道還(1969)。科學革命的結構。台北：遠流。延伸查詢
14.	Feyerabend, Paul(1978)。Science in a free society。Lowe & Brydone Ltd.。
15.	Wendt, Alexander E.(1999)。Social Theory of International Politics。Cambridge：Harvard University Press。
16.	Feyerabend, Paul K.(1978)。Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge。Verso。
17.	Campbell, David(1992)。Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the politics of Identity。Minneapolis：University of Minnesota Press。
18.	Goldstein, Judith、Keohane, Robert O.(1993)。Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change。Cornell University Press。
19.	Lakatos, Imre、Worral, John、Currie, Gregory(1978)。The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs。Cambridge：Cambridege University press。
20.	Kubálková, Vendulka、Onuf, Nicholas G.、Kowert, Paul(1998)。International Relations In a Constructed World。Armonk, New York：M. E. Sharpe。
21.	黃光國(2001)。社會科學的理路。臺北：心理出版社。延伸查詢
22.	Simmons, Beth A.、Risse, Thomas、Carlsnanes, Walter(2002)。Handbook of International Relations。Sage。
23.	Hobson, John M.(2000)。The State and International Relations。Cambridge University Press。
24.	莫大華(20030000)。建構主義國際關係理論與安全研究。臺北：時英。延伸查詢
25.	Beer, Francis A.、Hariman, Robert(1996)。Realistic Rhetoric but not Realism: A Senatorial Conversation on Cambodia。Post-Realism: The Rhetorical Turn in International Relations。East Lansing, MI。
26.	Linklater, Andrew(2001)。Rationalism。Theories of International Relations。New York, NY。
27.	Wendt, Alexander(2006)。Social Theory as Cartesian Science: An Auto-Critique from a Quantum Perspective。Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics。New York。
28.	Finnemore, Martha(1996)。Cornell University Press。Cornell University Press。Ithaca, NY。
29.	Klee, Robert(1997)。Introduction to the Philosophy of Science: Cutting Nature at Its Seams。Oxford University Press。
30.	Kulp, Christopher(1997)。Realism/ Antirealism and Epistemology。Realism/ Antirealism and Epistemology。New York, NY。
31.	Richardson, James L.(2001)。Contending Liberalism in World Politics: Ideology and Power。Contending Liberalism in World Politics: Ideology and Power。Boulder, CO。
32.	(2001)。Visions of International Relations。Visions of International Relations。Columbia, SC。
33.	Patomäki, Heikki(2002)。After International Relations: Critical Realism and the (Re) Construction of World Politics。After International Relations: Critical Realism and the (Re) Construction of World Politics。New York, NY。
34.	Kahler, Miles(1999)。Rationality in International Relations。Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics。Cambridge, MA。
35.	Kegley, Charles W., Jr.(2001)。Bridge Building in the Study of International Relations: How 'Kuhn' We Do Better?。Visions of International Relations。Columbia, SC。
36.	Risse, Thomas(2002)。Constructivism and International Institutions: Toward Conversations across Paradigms。Political Science as Discipline: Reconsidering Power, Choice, and the State at Century's End。New York, NY。
37.	Wight, Colin(2002)。Philosophy of Social Science and International Relations。Handbook of International Relations。London, UK。
38.	Lake, David A.(2002)。Progress in International Relations: Beyond Paradigms in the Study of Institutions。Realism and Institutionalism in International Studies。Ann Arbor, MI。
39.	Debrix, Francois(2003)。Language, Nonfunctionalism, and International Relations。Language, Agency, and Politics in a Constructed World。New York, NY。

單篇論文
1.	Peterson, Susan，Tierney, Michael J.，Maliniak, Daniel(2005)。Teaching and Research Practices, Views on the Discipline, and Policy Attitudes of International Relations Faculty at U.S. Colleges and Universities，The Wendy and Emery Reves Center for International Studies, College of William & Mary。

其他
1.	Rose, Gideon(1998)。Review: Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy，https://www.jstor.org/stable/25054068。
2.	Nielson, Daniel，Tierney, Michael，Weaver, Catherine(2005)。Bridging the Rationalist-Constructivist Divide: Engineering Change at the World Bank，0。
3.	Panke, Diana(2005)。How to Combine Rationalist and Constructivist Accounts of International Politics: Building Bridge on Terra Firma，0。
4.	Webb, Keith(1995)。Preliminary Questions about Postmodernism，0。

圖書論文
1.	Fearon, James D.、Wendt, Alexander(2002)。Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View。Handbook of International Relations。Sage Publications。
2.	Waever, Ole(1996)。The Rise and Fall of the Inter-Paradigm Debate。International Theory: Positivism and Beyond。New York：Cambridge University Press。
3.	Jogensen, Knud Erik(2001)。Four Levels and a Discipline。Constructing International Relations: The Next Generation。Armonk：M. E. Sharpe。
4.	Risse-Kappen, Thomas(1996)。Collective Identity in a Democratic Community: The Case of NATO。The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics。New York, NY：Columbia University Press。
5.	Kratochwil, Friedrich(2006)。Constructing a New Orthodoxy?: Wendt's Social Theory of International Politics and the Constructivist Challenge。Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics。New York, NY。
6.	Smith, Steve(1996)。Positivism and beyond。International theory: Positivism and beyond。Cambridge University Press。
7.	Smith, Steve(2001)。Reflectivist and Constructivist Approaches to International Theory。The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations。Oxford：Oxford University Press。
8.	Jepperson, Ronald L.、Wendt, Alexander、Katzenstein, Peter Joachim(1996)。Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security。The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics。Columbia University Press。
9.	Smith, Steve(1997)。New Approaches to International Theory。The Globalization of World Politics。London：Oxford University Press。
10.	Klotz, Audie(2001)。Can We Speak a Common Constructivist Language?。Constructing International Relations: The Next Generation。M. E. Sharpe。
11.	Smith, Steve(1995)。The Self-Images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory。International Relations Theory Today。University Park, PA：Penn State University Press。
12.	Demeritt, David(1998)。Science, Social Constructivism and Nature。Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium。London：Routledge。
13.	Albert, Mathias(2001)。What Systems Theory Can Tell Us about Constructivism。Constructing International Relations: The Next Generation。New York, NY：M.E. Sharpe。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	從建構主義視角分析美中競爭中越南的策略選擇
2.	試從現實主義理論探討美「中」關係之發展
3.	國際關係理論國際體系理論化研究及其知識論思辨：非均衡體系理論的知識論反思
4.	我國關鍵基礎設施作為檢視--以行政院國土辦及法務部調查局為例
5.	從情報策略看美中的協作與協調
6.	Nicholas Onuf與Friedrich Kratochwil的社會理論、國際法與國際關係理論連結之比較分析
7.	聯合國「主權保護責任」與「人道軍事干預」規範的社會建構：建構主義的觀點
8.	「反軍事風尚」形成對臺灣國防安全之影響
9.	建構主義的爭論與評價
10.	近年間西方國際關係理論界之爭論與建構主義的崛起
11.	中國大陸對歐洲區域整合的認同認知與因應
12.	探索國際關係理論的後設理論爭論：國際關係學科的科學進展反思
13.	兩岸關係的辯證性建構
14.	哈伯瑪斯的溝通行動理論與國際關係建構主義的結合
15.	論中國崛起：中、西方國際關係理論的觀點

1.	中國大陸非政府組織與跨國倡議網絡：建構理論的觀點
2.	兩岸刑事司法合作規範的社會建構--以引渡與遣返為核心
3.	歐巴馬政府亞太政策之分析
4.	歐洲整合發展與演進：權力、利益、認同與制度建構之整合分析
5.	東突厥斯坦問題與中共對策研究
6.	胡錦濤時期中共國家形象建構─建構主義觀點
7.	國家安全與危機決策之多元分析
8.	從國際合作框架探討區域經濟整合之可能性
9.	中國大陸周邊外交戰略之研究：兼論對兩岸關係之影響(2002-2012)
10.	和諧世界觀下的中國外交政策
11.	從非傳統安全觀點探討人口安全問題－以中國大陸人口安全為例
12.	國際關係建構主義理論國家形象塑造的媒體因素之研究─以《聯合報》與《自由時報》對中國大陸國家形象建構為例（1999-2009）
13.	聯盟的本質：解釋後冷戰時期的北約存續
14.	國際關係規範建構主義與國際社會化：以氣候典則中的美中兩國社會化為例
15.	北極圈海域爭端之研究-Waltz結構現實主義理論之檢視與評析

1.	中國對外政策：從江澤民到習近平
2.	後冷戰時期日本與東協互動關係轉變之研究：安全與發展之建構主義分析(1990~2010)
3.	中國歷史戰爭科學研析
4.	相對獲益與絕對獲益觀點下的東亞經濟合作
5.	國際安全理論 : 權力、主權與威脅
6.	國家安全的理論與實際
7.	身份政治 : 偶然性、能動者與情境
8.	兩岸是人為造成的制度 : 以建構主義為本體論的新制度分析
9.	中國遵循國際導彈建制的解析
10.	建構主義國際關係理論與安全研究
11.	建構中國 : 不確定世界中的大國定位與大國外交
12.	後現代的政治知識
13.	初探未來學門的困境與本體論的糾結--兼論貝爾《未來學導論》的落差
14.	中國大陸對歐洲區域整合的認同認知與因應
15.	中國大陸對歐洲區域整合的權利認知

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫