智慧財產權--社會恐怖亦或正當保護：對當前智慧財產權的趨勢及其影響之省思與探討_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	智慧財產權--社會恐怖亦或正當保護：對當前智慧財產權的趨勢及其影響之省思與探討
書刊名：	大學圖書館
作者：	Britz, Johannes／林素聿
作者(外文)：	Lin, Suyu
出版日期：	2007
卷期：	11:1
頁次：	頁1-20
主題關鍵詞：	智慧財產權；資訊倫理；社會公平；資訊盜用；Intellectual property rights；Information ethics；Social justice；Information piracy
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:32

本文論述我們現今生活在一個新世紀，大環境首次出現一個資訊與知識的流通幾乎是零成本的數位時代。然而，資訊的取得和使用卻漸形困難，這主要是歸因於整個資訊產品與服務商品化的國際趨勢，以及伴隨而來愈來愈嚴苛的智慧財產權制度。這個發展將人們隔絕於重要資訊之外也從而剝奪了一項基本人權--資訊取得權。在本文中並論及經濟因素的重要性之於智慧財產權已遠大於道德與社會的因素，這使得智慧財產權系統中的雙重本質失衡，而有利於所有權／獨家的論據；以及在這個趨勢下對於資訊原創者、原住民族以及發展中國家的影響。

以文找文

It is argued that we are living in an new era where the digital environment for the first time allows the creation of an information commons. The information and knowledge can be distributed to the largest number of people at nearly zero cost. However, access to and use of information has become increasingly difficult. This is mainly due to the international trend to commodify information products and services and the accompanied strengthening of intellectual property rights. This leads to the exclusion of people from accessing essential information, thereby denying them a fundamental human right-the right of accessing to information. In this puper shows that the economic argument on justifying intellectual property has become more important than the moral and social factors. This has brought an imbalance in the dual nature of intellectual property systems, favouring the ownership/exclusion argument. It is demonstrated how this has impacted on the original creators of information, indigenous peoples and developing countries

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Beristain, S.(2003)。Digital rights management。The Parliament Maganize，172，31。
2.	Britz, J. J.、Lor, P. J.(2003)。A moral reflection on the flow from South to North with specific reference to the African continent。Libri，53(3)，149-225。
3.	Britz, J. J.(2004)。To know or not to know: A moral reflection on informaion poverty。Journal of Information Science，30(1)，192-204。
4.	Britz, J. J.、Lor, P. J.、Bothma, T. J. D.(2006)。Global capitalism and the fair distribution of information in t he marketplace: A moral reflection from the perspective of the developing world。Journal of Information Ethics，15(1)，60-69。
5.	CSIR News(2001)。Traditional knowledge digital library。CSIR News，51(5, 6)，1-3。
6.	Diamond, D.(2003)。MIT MIT Everyware: Every lecture every handout, every quiz. All online. For free. Meet the global geeks getting an MIT education, open source-style。Wired。
7.	Dougherty, T.(355)。Groups rights to cultural survival: Intellectual property rights in native American cultural symbols。Columbia human rights law review，29，1998。
8.	Drahos, Peter(1997)。Thinking strategically about intellectual property rights。Telecommunication policy，21(3)，201-211。
9.	Evans, P. B.、Wurster, T. S.(1997)。Strategies and the new economics of information。Harvard Business Review，75(5)，71-82。
10.	Lipinski T.A.、Britz J. J.(2000)。Rethinking the ownership of information in the 21st century: Ethical implications。Ethics and Information Technology，2(1)，49-71。
11.	Long, D. E.(1998)。The impact of foreign investment on indigenous culture: An intellectual property perspective。North Carolina journal of international Law & Commercial Regulation，23(2)，229-240。
12.	Miaorips, E.(2000)。Agreement of impacts on pharmaceutical sector。The National Law Journal。
13.	Nayyer, K.(2002)。Globalisation of information: Intellectual property law implications。First Monday，7(1)。
14.	Programme of the Enhancement of Research Information(2001)。African book publishing record。African book publishing record，27(4)，299。
15.	Siochrú, S.(2003)。FLOSS would give WSIS teeth。Terraviva，1-4。
16.	Schiller, A.、Schiller, H.(1982)。Who can own waht America owns?。The Nation，461-463。
17.	Schiller, A.、Schiller, H.(1986)。Commercialising information。The Nation，306-309。
18.	Thomas, P. N.、Lee, P.(2002)。Why should intellectual property rights matter to civil society?。Media development : journal of the World Association for Christian Communication，2002(4)，6-8。
19.	Hielmcrone, H. von(2000)。The efforts of the European Union to harmonise copyright and the impact on freedom of information。Libri，50，32-39。

會議論文
1.	Stratton, B.、Lor, P. J.(2005)。The important of exceptions and limitations to the fair operation of copyright regimes。Geneva, Switzerland。

學位論文
1.	Geldenhuys, T.(1993)。Die regsbeskerming van inligting，Pretoia。

圖書
1.	Anderson, Chris(2006)。The Long Tail : Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More。New York, NY：Commonwealth Publishing：Hyperion。
2.	WTO(2003)。Understanding the WTO。Geneva：WTO。
3.	Gillian, Davies(1994)。Copyright and the Public Interest。New York：VCH。
4.	Miller, David(1999)。Principles of Social Justice。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Harvard University Press。
5.	Branscomb, A. W.(1995)。Who owns your informaion? : From privacy to public access。Who owns your informaion? : From privacy to public access。NY。
6.	Chang, H.(2003)。Golbalisation, economic development and the role of the state。Golbalisation, economic development and the role of the state。London。
7.	Drahos, Peter(1996)。Philosophy of intellectual property。Philosophy of intellectual property。London。
8.	Gurnesey, J.(1995)。Copyright theft。Copyright theft。NY。
9.	Gosh, S.(2007)。How to build a commons: Is intellectual property constrictive, Facilitating or irrelevant?。Understanding knowledge as a Commons。London。
10.	Hamelink, C. J.(1999)。Digitaal fastoen: Mensenrechten in cyberspace。Digitaal fastoen: Mensenrechten in cyberspace。Amsterdam。
11.	Hayek, Friedrich A. Von(1976)。Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol.11: The mirage of social justice。Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol.11: The mirage of social justice。London。
12.	Harris, L. E.(1997)。Digital property: Currency of the 21st Century。Digital property: Currency of the 21st Century。Toronto。
13.	Hess, C.、Ostrom, E.(2007)。Introduction: An overview of the knowledge commons。Understanding knowledge as a Commons。London。
14.	Kranich, N.(2007)。Countering enclosure: Reclamining the knowledge commons。Understanding knowledge as a Commons。London。
15.	Lyortard, J.(1984)。The post-modern position: A report on knowledge。The post-modern position: A report on knowledge。Manchester。
16.	Oz, E.(2002)。Management Information Systems。Management Information Systems。NY。
17.	Palmer, T. G.(1997)。Intellectual property: A non posnerian law and economics approach。Intellectual property: Moral, Legal and International Dilemmas。Maryland。
18.	Plotkin, M. J.(1988)。Biodiversity。The outlook for new agricultural and industrial products from the tropics。NY。
19.	Stuber, P.(2007)。Creating an intellcetual commons through open access。Understanding knowledge as a Commons。London。
20.	Wiess, F.、De Waart, P.(1998)。International Economic Law with a Human Face: An introductory view。International Economic Law with a Human Face。London。

其他
1.	Becker, K.(2003)。Why intellectual property issues matter?，Vienna, Austria。
2.	Bollier, D.(2003)。Preserving the commons in the information order，Vienna, Austria。
3.	Boynton, R.(2004)。Tyranny of copyright?，NY。
4.	Capdevila, G.(2000)。Indigenous Peoples Defend Traditional Knowledge。
5.	(2002)。Convention text。
6.	Creative Commons。
7.	Correa, C. M.，Musungu, S. F.(2002)。The WIPO patent agenda: The risk for developing countries。
8.	Deere, C.(2003)。Developing countries and IP policy，Vienna, Austria。
9.	Drahos, Peter(2003)。The injustice of intellectual property，Vienna, Austria。
10.	International Intellectual Property Alliance(2003)。Copyright industries support the U.S. trade representative's commitment to combat piracy，Washington, DC.。
11.	Sabbagh, D.(2004)。Reed Elsevier chief hits back in scientific publishing row，UK。
12.	South Centre(2002)。Preface。
13.	St. Jude Children's Research Hospital，Memphis, TN , USA。
14.	Toner, A.(2003)。The problem with WSIS，Vienna, Austria。
15.	WIPO(2004)。WIPO General Assembly，Geneva, Switzerland。
16.	WIPO(1998)。World Intellectual Property Organization 1998 Website，Geneva, Switzerland。
17.	World Bank Legal Review(2003)。The world bank legal review: Law and Justice for Development，Netherlands。
18.	WIPO(2003)。Intellectual Property and generic resources, traditional knowledge and folklore，Geneva。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	全人教育課程於智慧財產權觀念推廣之角色淺究
2.	資訊系統之倫理課題

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫