:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:水產研究人員隱性知識分享之研究
書刊名:大學圖書館
作者:陳佳香陳昭珍 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Chia-hsiangChen, Chao-chen
出版日期:2007
卷期:11:1
頁次:頁73-96
主題關鍵詞:知識管理隱性知識隱性知識分享Knowledge managementTacit knowledgeTacit knowledge share
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:28
本論文的研究目的為分析水產研究人員的隱性知識在學術傳播的分享方式,探討水產研究人員隱性知識分享的現況,並綜合研究發現,提供水產專門研究之圖書館提供服務的方向。本研究以質性研究為取向,主要採取深度訪談法,輔以參與觀察和相關文獻資料來進行資料蒐集,研究對象為水產試驗所研究人員,於民國九十四年八月至十月間採取立意的配額取樣,針對十六位研究人員進行深度訪談,其後將資料予以歸納分析、編碼與詮釋,最後作結果呈現。研究結果顯示,水產研究人員的隱性知識是屬於專業實踐的現場知識;分享的方法是直接的溝通方式;隱性知識轉移的重要性因為層級與認知不同而有差異。研究建議,成立隱性知識分享小組,並進一步提昇圖書館成為知識中心。
This study is a quantitative research to explore researchers' tacit knowledge sharing behaviors of the Fisheries Research Institute in Taiwan. The goal is to enhance library's services to fisheries researchers through this understanding. The study has depth interviewed 16 researchers from different departments of the Institute. In addition, their relevant work documents such as laboratory diaries and project notes are also reviewed. The study shows that researchers' tacit knowledge is the knowledge of professional practice. Their sharing method mainly is direct communication through conference, meeting, and laboratory diaries and notes. The study found that the Institute lacks a systematic mechanism to display researchers' tacit knowledge. The importance of the transfer of tacit knowledge is not firmly recognized. Thus, the study suggests that creating specified groups and establishing environment for sharing tacit knowledge in the Institute are needed. Also, the Institute could enhance library's functions to become a fisheries knowledge management center in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.賴鼎銘(19950900)。知識社會學與圖書資訊學的學術基礎。資訊傳播與圖書館學,2(1),50-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Hickins, M.(1999)。Xerox Shares its Knowledge。Management Review,88(8),40-45。  new window
3.Mascitelli, R.(2000)。From Experience, Harnessing Tacit Knowledge to Achieve Breakthrough Innovation。Journal of product innovation management,17(3),179-193。  new window
4.Lubit, R.(2001)。Tacit knowledge and knowledge management: The keys to sukstainable competitive advantage。Organizational Dynamics,29(4),164-178。  new window
5.賴鼎銘、吳萬鈞(1997)。圖書資訊學教育有待突破的二個方向。中華民國圖書館學會會報,58,37-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Al-Hawamedeh, Suliman(2002)。Knowledge management: rethinking information management and faacing the challenge of managing tackt knowledge。Information Research,8(1)。  new window
7.Perez, Ernest(1999)。Knowledge management in the library-not。Database,22(2),75-78。  new window
8.Chamberlain, George W.(1999)。Farmed seafood and the environment: responding to our critics。Global aquaculture advocate,2(6),6。  new window
9.江新、鄭蘭琴、黃榮怌(2005)。關於隱性知識的分類研究。開放教育研究,11(1),28。  延伸查詢new window
10.Noh, J. B.(2000)。A case-based reasoning approach to cognitive map-driven tacit knowledge management。Expert System with Application,19,250。  new window
11.Gunnlaugsdottir, Johanna(2003)。Seek and you will find, share and you will benefit: organising knowledge using groupware systems。International Journal of Information Management,23,365。  new window
12.Castillo, Jose(2002)。A note on the concept of tacit knowledge。Journal of management inquiry,11(1),54。  new window
13.劉多蘭(2004)。隱性知識的發現與利用。科技情報開發與經濟,14(9),165-166。  延伸查詢new window
14.Sharma, Himanshu(2002)。Knowledge management in the tacit dimension。Annals of library and information studies,49(2),69-71。  new window
15.陳泰明(2000)。分享知識的企業。能力雜誌,11,32。  延伸查詢new window
16.肖廣玲(1999)。隱性知識、隱性認識和科學研究。自然辯證法研究,15(8),20。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.邱子恆(2002)。圖書資訊服務業知識資源組織之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.藍雅如(2004)。知識獲取來源與人力資源專業職能發展關聯性之研究(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Krogh, George Von、Ichijo, Kazuo、Nonaka, Ikujiro(2000)。Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation。Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Beazley, H.、Boenisch, J.、Harden, D.(2002)。Continuity Management: Preserving Corporate Knowledge and Productivity When Employees Leave。Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons, Inc。  new window
3.王德玲(2003)。延續管理--留住員工的腦袋。台北:天下雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
4.Davenport, Thomas H.、Prusak, Laurence(2000)。Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know。Harvard Business School Press。  new window
5.野中郁次郎、竹內弘高、楊子江、王美音(1997)。創新求勝:智價企業論。臺北市:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Becher, Tony(1989)。Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines。The society for Research into Higher Education。  new window
7.博藍尼、許澤民(2004)。個人知識:邁向後批判哲學。商周。  延伸查詢new window
8.Sallis, Edward、Jones, Gary M.(2004)。教育知識管理。教育知識管理。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.Stewart, Thomas A.(2002)。The wealth of knowledge: intellectual capital and twenty-fisrt century organization。The wealth of knowledge: intellectual capital and twenty-fisrt century organization。NY。  new window
10.陳雅琴(2001)。知識經濟的基本觀念介紹與探討-以APEC國家的知識經濟發展經驗為例。APEC 議題研究精選系列1:知識經濟、人力資源發展。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Richard, Debbie,Busch, Peter Anthony(2000)。Formalising and modelling tacit knowledge。  new window
2.Woo, Jeong-Han(2005)。AIA report on University research,Washington D.C.。  new window
3.陳雪華(2002)。臺灣地區工商圖書館員工作環境與角色變遷之研究(初稿),臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE