臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：以法院為基礎的社會工作家事調解歷程之初探
書刊名：臺灣社會工作學刊
作者：陳伶珠 引用關係／盧佳香
作者(外文)：Chen, Ling-chu／Lu, Jia-shiang
出版日期：2006
卷期：5
頁次：頁75+77-125
主題關鍵詞：家事調解；社會工作調解員；家事調解歷程；Family conciliation；Social work conciliator；Family conciliation process
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:67
本文描述以法院為基礎的社會工作家事調解服務之案件概況，並就社工師團隊之實務調解經驗探討社會工作家事調解歷程。研究對象與方法：以社工師團隊在台中地方法院歷時一年的調解個案記錄進行描述分析，共二五三份，並對九名調解員進行深度訪談。研究結果：訴訟議題以離婚(71.4%)及未成年子女親權歸屬議題(41.7%)最多；82.2%原告／聲請人是女性；當事人年齡以36歲以上居多；87.4%的當事人是無婚姻關係或已分居；93.9%當事人有未成年子女，其年齡以7歲以上最多；66.8%被告／相對人被指稱／呈現有問題，其問題以施行婚姻暴力（肢體）最多(50.6%)。該團隊實際調解率52.9%。調解結果與當事人之「原告／聲請人性別」、「婚姻狀況」、「被告／相對人被指稱／呈現有問題」，以及調解員之「案件所屬年份」、「調解資歷」、「調解案量」變項有顯著關聯。研究者依據調解員深度訪談資料將其調解歷程分為三個調解階段、十個任務、以及達成各階段任務的調解技巧。研究結果顯示以法院為基礎的社會工作家事調解歷程是一個短期促使當事人理性合作，使其發展雙方合意方案以解決紛爭的過程。社會工作調解員致力於促使雙方當事人發展紛爭解決方案，使其方案能夠兼顧到未成年子女的基本需求與最佳利益，同時也重視當事人的家庭系統與資源的運用。
This paper drawn a picture of the cases in court-based family conciliation and a preliminary process of court-based social work family conciliation via the practical social work conciliation team discussed. Research participants and methods: descriptive analysis of 253 case records of Taichung District Court in a period of one year and in-depth interview of 9 conciliators. Result of research: Most of the litigate issues are divorce (71.4%) and guardianship (41.7%). Most of the petitioners/demandants are women (82.2%). The majority litigants are over 36 years old, 87.4% do not have marriage relation or live apart, 93.9% have children and the age of the children are mostly over 7. Many respondents/counterparts are accused/appeared problematically (66.8%), the majority are domestic violence (50.6%). The actual conciliation rate is 52.9% and which is associated with the litigants (sex of the petitioners/demandants, marital status of the litigants, the respondents/counterparts be accused/appeared problematically) and the conciliators' experience (year of the cases, seniority of the conciliators, quantity of caseload). The conciliation process includes three stages and ten tasks, the related skills are also addressed. The result of this research shows that the court-based family conciliation process is a short-term intervention of encouraging the litigants to reasonably cooperate with each other and enhancing an agreeable dispute resolution. Throughout the process, social work conciliators devote to assisting the litigants in negotiating an agreement which they accept and consistent with their children's needs and best interests. Family systems and resources are also emphasized.
期刊論文
1.賴芳玉(2005)。精緻的司法--從家事調解制度做起。全國律師，9(8)，1-3。  延伸查詢new window
2.兒童福利聯盟(20050800)。兒盟推動家事商談服務的經驗分享與成效初探。全國律師，9(8)，37-53。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2006)。家事專業調解成效受好評,將再擴大試行一年。司法周刊，1280，1。  延伸查詢new window
4.彭南元(20021002)。論家事案件採心理諮詢服務之可行性。司法周刊，1102，2。  延伸查詢new window
5.Cobb, S.(1997)。The Domestication of Violence in Mediation。Law & Society Review，31(3)，397-440。  new window
6.Cohen, O.、Luxenburg, A.、Dattner, N.、Matz, D. E.(1999)。Suitability of Divorcing Couples for Mediation: A Suggested Typology。American Journal of Family Therapy，27(4)，329-344。  new window
7.Ogus, A.、Jones-Lee, M.、Cole, W.、McCarthy, P.(1990)。Evaluating Alternative Dispute Resolution: Measuring the Impact of Family Conciliation on Costs。The Modern Law Review，53(1)，57-74。  new window
8.Simpson, B.(1991)。The Children Act 1989 and the Voice of the Child in Family Conciliation。Family Court Review，29(4)，385-397。  new window
9.Simpson, B.、Corlyon, J.、McCarthy, P.、Walker, J.(1990)。Client Responses to Family Conciliation: Achieving Clarity in the Midst of Confusion。British Journal of Social Work，20(6)，557-574。  new window
10.Weingarten, H. R.(1986)。Strategic Planning for Divorce Mediation。Social Work，31(3)，194-200。  new window
11.Weiss, W. W.、Collada, H. B.(1977)。Conciliation Counseling: The Court's Effective Mechanism for Resolving Visitation and Custody Disputes。Family Coordinator，26(4)，444-446。  new window
12.高金枝(20050800)。協助離婚的夫妻成為合作的父母--從參訪澳洲家事調解制度，談試行中之家事事件專業調解。全國律師，9(8)，4-12。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳玉完(20060803)。家事調解之檢討與展望--司法行政推展家事調解新制週年經驗分享。司法周刊，1298，2-3。  延伸查詢new window
14.謝靜慧(20050800)。探尋家事調解新方向--以臺灣士林地方法院家事法庭處理家事調解經驗出發。全國律師，9(8)，13-23。  延伸查詢new window
15.Flynn, D.(2005)。The Social Worker as Family Mediator: Balancing Power in Cases Involving Family Violence。Australian Social Work，58(4)，407-418。  new window
會議論文
1.王智弘、唐訢雅、廖婉喻、蘇盈儀(2005)。家事商談的倫理議題。2005家事商談國際研討會，長榮大學社會工作系、財團法人感恩社會福利基金會、長榮大學社會力研究發展中心主辦 。台南。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.內政部統計處(2006)。內政統計通報九十五年第二十一週(94年離婚者按結婚年數統計)。  延伸查詢new window
2.司法院(2006)。司法統計年報:九十四年地方法院終結離婚事件--按年別分。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.涂秀玲(2006)。離婚親權行使事件中家事調解之研究--以子女最佳利益為中心(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.王唯馨(2005)。家事調解員的調解策略與調解經驗之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.賴月蜜(2005)。澳洲、香港、日本之家事商談相關制度比較研究--兼論我國家事商談制度之現況與發展(博士論文)。國立暨南國際大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Irving, Howard H.(2002)。Family Mediation: Theory and Practice with Chinese Families。Hong Kong University Press。  new window
2.Irving, H. H.、Benjamin, M.(2002)。Therapeutic Family Mediation: Helping Families Resolve Conflict。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
3.Mantle, G.(2001)。Helping Parents in Dispute: Child-centred Mediation at County Court。Hampshire：Ashgate。  new window
4.Parkinson, L.(1986)。Conciliation in Separation and Divorce: Finding Common Ground。London：Croom Helm。  new window
5.Miles, M. B.、Huberman, A. M.(1994)。An Expanded Source Book: Qualitative Data Analysis。Thousand Oaks, CA：SAGE。  new window
6.Irving, H. H.、Benjamin, M.(1995)。Family Mediation: Contemporary Issues。Sage。  new window
其他
1.楊熾光(2006)。台灣台中地方法院加強調解業務視察報告，台中：台中地方法院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.楊孝濚(1989)。內容分析。社會及行為科學研究法。台北：東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Barsky, A. E.(2004)。Mediating Separation of Same-sex Couples。Divorce and Family Mediation: Models, Techniques, and Applications。New York：The Guilford Press。  new window
3.Beck, C. A.、Saled, B. D.、Emery, R. E.(2004)。Research on the Impact of Family Mediation。Divorce and Family Mediation: Models, Techniques, and Applications。New York：The Guilford Press。  new window
4.Brown, E. M.(2004)。Mediating in the Shadow of an Affair。Divorce and Family Mediation: Models, Techniques, and Applications。New York：The Guilford Press。  new window
5.Cull, L.(2001)。Family Breakdown。The Law and Social Work: Contemporary Issues for Practice。New York：Palgrave。  new window
6.Lang, M.(2004)。Understanding and Responding to Power in Mediation。Divorce and Family Mediation: Models, Techniques, and Applications。New York：The Guilford Press。  new window
7.Pruett, M. K.、Johnson, J. R.(2004)。Therapeutic Mediation with High-Conflict Parents: Effective Models and Strategies。Divorce and Family Mediation: Models, Techniques, and Applications。New York：The Guilford Press。  new window
8.Raisner, J. K.(2004)。Mediation with Never-Married Parents。Divorce and Family Mediation: Models, Techniques, and Applications。New York：The Guilford Press。  new window
9.Ricci, I.(2004)。Court-based Mandatory Mediation: Special Consideration。Divorce and Family Mediation: Models, Techniques, and Applications。New York：The Guilford Press。  new window
10.Welsh, N. A.(2004)。Reconciling Self-determination, Coercion, and Settlement in Court-connected Mediation。Divorce and Family Mediation: Models, Techniques, and Applications。New York：The Guilford Press。  new window
11.Westcott, J.(2004)。The Origins and Development of Family Mediation in the UK。Family Mediation: Past, Present and Future。Bristol：Jordan Publishing Limited。  new window
12.Milne, A. L.(2004)。Mediation and Domestic Abuse。Divorce and Family Mediation: Models, Techniques, and Applications。New York：The Guilford Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：542（臺灣：537，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1827278 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67639565
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上