資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.191.154.231)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
20世紀行銷學思想演進與意涵
書刊名:
文大商管學報
作者:
黃恆獎
/
李冠志
作者(外文):
Huang, Heng-chiang
/
Lee, Guann-jyh
出版日期:
2007
卷期:
12:2
頁次:
頁1-18
主題關鍵詞:
行銷科學哲學
;
行銷典範
;
行銷學派
;
Philosophy of marketing science
;
Marketing paradigm
;
Marketing schools
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:
5
點閱:21
行銷學發展至20世紀,學者咸認最大疏失即缺乏對行銷科學哲學之評估,雖接受既有行銷學理,未細思檢證行銷學吸納其他學科之理論內容,致忽略行銷哲學思想遞變衍生之脈絡及其實存內容,無法辨明各學派思想本質之優劣與發展潛力。行銷科學哲學之研究亟應修正上述缺失,針對建構行銷學理論內容與應用,予以精細研析及論述,以提供研究所需之典範、語言及隱喻,使對各學說之評估可滿足語法論(syntax)、語意學(semantics)、語用論(pragmatics)之結構性與實存性要求,賦予行銷學更明確之研究主題與哲學意涵,朝發展人文主義(humanitarianism)價值及先進實務技術之目標前進;並運用總體性之系統論點,建立整合性之理論架構,以使行銷科學哲學之發展更富歷史導向基礎,提供更具應用價值之研究成果。
以文找文
The core problem derived from researches on marketing theories in the 20th century is the lack of evaluation of the philosophy of science. Scholars usually accept the existing theories without considering carefully of the substantial content and the influx from other disciplines. So they are unable to understand the developing context of marketing theories, thoughts encouraged by various schools, and their evolutionary philosophical implication. A study of the philosophy of marketing science needs to cope with these difficulties and to demonstrate potentiality for future exploration. The evaluation of the theories could provide satisfactory answers for the structural demands of syntax, semantics and pragmatics. It also renders more definite research topics and more precise significance of the research. In addition, to highlight historicism and humanitarianism in the arguments and to develop advanced empirical practices are critical for systemic and integrated research.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Jones, D. G. Brian、Monieson, David D.(1990)。Early Development of the Philosophy of Marketing Thought。Journal of Marketing,54(1),102-113。
2.
Sieber, Sam D.(1973)。The Integration of Fieldwork and Survey Methods。The American Journal of Sociology,78(6),1335-1359。
3.
Anderson, Paul F.(1983)。Marketing, Scientific Progress and Scientific Method。Journal of Marketing,47(4),18-31。
4.
Bass, F. M.(1993)。The Future of Research in Marketing: Marketing Science。Journal of Marketing Research,30(1),1-6。
5.
Bagozzi, Richard P.(1974)。What Is a Marketing Relationship?。Der Market,51(1),64-69。
6.
Dorfman, Joseph(1955)。The Role of the German Historical School in American Economic Growth。American Economic Review,45(2),17-39。
7.
Hunt, Shelby D.(1993)。Objectivity in Marketing Theory and Research。Journal of Marketing,57(4),76-91。
8.
Miles, Matthew B.(1979)。Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis。Administrative Science Quarterly,24(4),590-601。
9.
Peter, J. Paul(1992)。Realism or Relativism for Marketing Theory and Research: A Comment on Hunt's Scientific Realism。Journal of Marketing,56(2),72-79。
10.
Peter, J. Paul、Olson, Jerry C.(1983)。Is Science Marketing?。Journal of Marketing,47(4),111-125。
11.
Tsoukas, H.(1989)。The Validity of Idiographic Research Explanations。Academy of Management Review,14(4),551-561。
12.
Leonard-Barton, Dorothy(1990)。A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites。Organization Science,1(3),248-266。
13.
Hunt, Shelby D.(1976)。The Nature and Scope of Marketing。Journal of Marketing,40(3),17-28。
14.
林勤豐(20020600)。國內行銷研究之發展與評估--以行銷思想學派為分類基礎。商管科技季刊,3(2),135-160。
延伸查詢
15.
Fullerton, Ronald A.(1988)。How Modern Is Modern Marketing? Marketing's Evolution and the Myth of the "Production Era"。Journal of Marketing,52(1),108-125。
16.
Hunt, Shelby D.、Burnett, John J.(1982)。The Macromarketing/Micromarketing Dichotomy: A Taxonomical Model。Journal of Marketing,46(3),11-26。
17.
Hunt, Shelby D.(1983)。General Theories and the Fundamental Explananda of Marketing。Journal of Marketing,47(4),9-17。
18.
Muncy, James A.、Fisk, Raymond P.(1987)。Cognitive Relativism and the Practice of Marketing Science。Journal of Marketing,51(1),20-33。
19.
Jick, Todd D.(1979)。Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action。Administrative Science Quarterly,24(4),602-611。
20.
Teas, R. Kenneth、Palan, Kay M.(1997)。The Realms of Scientific Meaning Framework for Constructing Theoretically Meaningful Nominal Definitions of Marketing Concepts。Journal of Marketing,61(2),52-67。
21.
Bonoma, Thomas V.(1985)。Case research in marketing: opportunities, problems, and a process。Journal of Marketing Research,22(2),199-208。
22.
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.(1989)。Building Theories from Case Study Research。Academy of Management Review,14(4),532-550。
會議論文
1.
許士軍(1985)。總體行銷的意義及其發展。中華民國市場拓展學會74年年會,5-12。
延伸查詢
2.
蔡敦浩(1986)。行銷理論的典範迷失及對理論發展的涵義。中華民國市場拓展學會75年年會,129-139。
延伸查詢
3.
Fullerton, Ronald A.(1984)。Capitalism and the Shaping of Modern Western Marketing。The Ninth International Macromarketing Seminar。
4.
Hunt, Shelby D.(1984)。Should Marketing Adopt Relativism?。Chicago, Illinois:American Marketing Association。30-34。
圖書
1.
Hexter, J. H.(1979)。On Historians: Reappraisals of Some of the Makers of Modern History。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。
2.
Bartels, Robert(1988)。The History of Marketing Thought。Columbus, Ohio:Publishing Horizons, Inc.。
3.
Firat, A. Fuat、Dholakia, Nikhilesh、Bagozzi, Richard P.(1987)。Philosophical and Radical Thought in Marketing。Lexington, Massachusetts:D. C. Heath and Company。
4.
Kotler, Philip(1972)。Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning and Control。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall, Inc.。
5.
McCullagh, C. Behan(1984)。Justifying Historical Descriptions。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。
6.
Gilbert, Felix、Graubard, Stephen Richards(1972)。Historical Studies Today。New York:W. W. Norton & Company。
7.
黃俊英(1998)。行銷思想。臺北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
延伸查詢
8.
Sheth, Jagdish N.、Gardner, David M.、Garrett, Dennis E.(1988)。Marketing Theory: Evolution and Evaluation。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。
9.
McCarthy, Edmund Jerome(1960)。Basic marketing: A managerial approach。Richard D. Irwin, Inc.。
10.
Hunt, Shelby D.(1976)。Marketing Theory: Conceptual Foundations of Research in Marketing。Columbus, Ohio:GRID Inc.。
11.
Hunt, Shelby D.(1983)。Marketing Theory: The Philosophy of Marketing Science。Homewood, Illinois:Richard D. Irwin, Inc.。
12.
Hunt, Shelby D.(1991)。Modern Marketing Theory: Critical Issues in the Philosophy of Marketing Science。Cincinnati, Ohio:South-Western Publishing Co.。
13.
Burke, Peter(1980)。Sociology and History。London:George Allen & Unwin Ltd.。
14.
Yin, Robert K.(1984)。Applications of Case Study Research。Beverly Hills, California:Sage Publications。
15.
Yin, Robert K.(1994)。Case study research: Design and methods。Sage Publications。
16.
Glaser, Barney G.、Strauss, Anselm L.(1967)。The Discovery of Grounded Theory。Aldine。
圖書論文
1.
Kumcu, Erdoğan(1987)。Historical Method: Toward a Relevant Analysis of Marketing Systems。Philosophical and Radical Thought in Marketing。Lexington, Massachusetts:D. C. Heath and Company。
2.
Sheth, Jagdith N.、Gross, Barbara L.(1988)。Parallel Development of Marketing and Consumer Behavior: A Historical Perspective。Historical Perspectives in Marketing。Lexington, Massachusetts:D. C. Heath and Company。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
華人中小企業的行銷研究:以臺灣研究經驗評價三階段脈絡分析法
2.
行銷研究議題之演化與發展趨勢--以JM、JMR、JAMS期刊為例
3.
臺灣地區行銷研究議題之演化與發展趨勢--以四種TSSCI管理期刊為例
4.
國內行銷研究之發展與評估--以行銷思想學派為分類基礎
1.
行銷學科學特性之立論基礎研究:典範移轉與顧客自主行銷之影響
2.
問卷知會內容廣度與深度對有效回應率之研究
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code