:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:異質產品研發與策略性貿易政策
書刊名:國立虎尾科技大學學報
作者:王文傑
作者(外文):Wang, Wen-chieh
出版日期:2007
卷期:26:4
頁次:頁57-68
主題關鍵詞:異質產品產品研發技術移轉策略性貿易政策Heterogeneous productsProduct R&DTechnological transferStrategic trade policy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:17
每個國家對於策略性產業都會訂定產業政策,以輔導本國廠商。許多文獻是在探討寡佔產業且產品為同質性的情形下,研究廠商之間製程研發(Process R&D) 行為的互動,或加上政府政策的影響。但是,拫據Scherer & Ross (1990) 所論述的,美國產業中有四分之三的R&D 投資是用在產品研發(Product R&D) 上;因此,對於寡佔廠商之間且產品存在差異化的情形下,產品R&D 的競爭與政府政策的效果,將是可以深入探討的課題。 本文研究的目的,在於政府對廠商進行(1)產品R&D 補貼、(2) 出口補貼及(3) 技術移轉等產業政策對於廠商R&D 決策、產出及一國褔利水準的影響,並將研究結果與Spencer & Brander (1983) 的文章所得到的結論對照比較。
Every country will enact the industrial policy to the strategic industry, in order to coach the national manufacturer. A lot of literature study products under the homogeneity nature situation in duopoly industry, study manufacturers make research and develop (Process R&D), and the behavioral of interaction, or add the influence of the government policy. However, according to Scherer & Ross (1990) describe, American have 3/4 R&D of investment to be spend on products R&D; So as to duopoly to take manufacturer and products have situation of heterogeneity. Hence, the competition of the products R&D and result of government policy, will be the interesting topic and worth studying. The purpose that this paper studies, lie in the government goes on to the manufacturer (1) The products R&D subsidies, (2) Export subsidies and (3) Technological transfer, etc. industrial policy make the manufacturer R&D, products and one country welfare, and the result of study made by Spencer & Brander (1983) articles classical conclusion contrast comparison.
期刊論文
1.Lin, P.、Saggi, K.(2002)。Product differentiation, process R&D, and the nature of market competition。European Economic Review,46,201-211。  new window
2.Erkal, N.(2004)。Optimal Licensing Policy in Differentiated Industries。Economic Record,81(252),51-64。  new window
3.Spencer, B.、Brander, J. A.(1983)。International R & D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy。Review of Economic Studies,50(4),707-722。  new window
4.Dixit, A. K.(1979)。A Model of Duopoly Suggesting a Theory of Entry Barriers。Bell Journal of Economics,10(1),20-32。  new window
5.Singh, Nirvikar、Vives, Xavier(1984)。Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly。RAND Journal of Economics,15(4),546-554。  new window
6.Klepper, S.(1996)。Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle。The American Economic Review,86(3),562-583。  new window
7.Brander, James A.、Spencer, Barbara J.(1985)。Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry。Journal of International Economics,18(1/2),83-100。  new window
8.D'Aspremont, Claude、Jacquemin, Alexis(1988)。Cooperative and Noncooperative R & D in Duopoly with Spillovers。The American Economic Review,78(5),1133-1137。  new window
9.Utterback, J. M.、Abernathy, William J.(1975)。A dynamic model of process and product innovation。Omega,3(6),639-656。  new window
研究報告
1.Brander, J. A.(1995)。Strategic Trade Policy。National Bureau of Economic Research。  new window
2.Mukherjee, A.、Balasubramanian, N.(1999)。Technology transfer in a horizontal differentiated product market。  new window
圖書
1.Scherer, Frederic M.、Ross, David(1990)。Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance。Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
2.Chiang, Alpha C.(1984)。Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics。New York。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關期刊論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE