:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:會計師法修正草案爭議問題之探討
書刊名:銘傳學刊
作者:黃荃林惠蓮
作者(外文):Huang, ChuanLin, Hui-lien
出版日期:2007
卷期:16
頁次:頁73-103
主題關鍵詞:會計師法修正The revision of the certified public accountant act
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:22
經濟環境的快速變遷,衍生性金融商品的盛行,造成國內外一連串企業醜聞,連帶對財務報表簽證的可信度與會計師的責任問題,使得會計師法順應社會的改變,因此,會計師法修正顯得更有必要。 本研究對會計師法修正草案用三角點交叉分析法,透過會計師、學術界和一般投資大眾的角度切入,利用檔案分析、深度訪談和問卷等研究方式,進行探討。 針對會計師修正草案中,某些較引起爭議部分進行探討。本研究分成五個層面,一是會計師之主管機關,二是會計師之執業資格方面,三是法人會計師事務所,四是會計師拒絕簽證,五是會計師懲戒等問題。會計師、一般投資大眾及專家學者三方面各有各的意見與立場。對上述部份產生之問題,作一探討。
Rapid changes in the economic environment along with a proliferation of financial derivatives have resulted in an string of scandals, both at home and abroad. These scandals have highlighted problems concerning both the trustworthiness of financial reports and the responsibilities of accountants, beginning to force accounting regulations to change to keep up with changes in society. Accounting regulations are in need of revision. We conduct a triangular analysis which takes into account the various perspectives of accountants, academics, and the public investors. We use a combination of survey studies, in-depth interviews, and questionnaires as data. This paper will discuss some of the more controversial aspects of the revision of the Accountant Act. The research is broken into five levels: 1) the governing agency of accountants, 2) the qualifications for accountants to practice, 3) the private practices of accountants, 4) the refusal of accountants to perform attestation, and 5) and the penalization of accountants. The accountants, the investors, and the researchers all have their own opinions and perspective, and this paper discusses some of the issues that affect each of these groups.
期刊論文
1.呂東英(20040800)。塑造嶄新的金融監理體系--從證券交易法及會計師法修正談起。金管法令,1,10-19。  延伸查詢new window
2.柯承恩(2004)。從博達案看公司治理。商業周刊,867,114-115。  延伸查詢new window
3.柯承恩(2004)。現有財務制度查不出弊案。商業周刊,879,144-145。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳慧蓉(20030500)。會計師法修正之芻議介紹兼述未來會計師管理之方向。證券暨期貨管理,21(5),44-54。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡揚宗(2005)。會計師法修正之評議。會計研究月刊,231,11-13。  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡揚宗(2005)。會計師法修正之評議。會計研究月刊,232,11-13。  延伸查詢new window
7.Deborab L. R.、Paul D. P.(2002)。Lawyers, Ethics, and Enron。Stan, J. L. Bus & Fin,8(9),30-31。  new window
8.Palmrose, Z. V.(1988)。An Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Auditor Service Quality。The Accounting Review,1988(Jan.),55-73。  new window
9.Schewartz, R.(199707)。Legal R. Audit Quality and Investment。The Accounting Review,72,385-406。  new window
10.Stice, J. D.(1991)。Using Financial and Market In formation to Identify Pre-Engagement Factors Associated with Lawsuits against Auditors。The Accounting Review,1991(Jul.),516-533。  new window
11.陳依蘋、鄭惠之(20040900)。專業組織的未來--會計師、律師向前走!。會計研究月刊,226,30-40。  延伸查詢new window
12.Knapp, M.(1991)。Factor That Audit Committee Members Use as Surrogates for Audit Quality。Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory,10(2),35-52。  new window
13.薛富井(20031000)。沙氏法案最新發展與我國相關規範探討。會計研究月刊,215,76-90。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.湯治亞(2005)。會計師對財務報表不實時的法律責任(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關期刊論文
 
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE