:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
立法院於九十四年一月三十日修正土地稅法及平均地權條例相關之規定,將土地增值稅減半課稅制度明文納入法律規定;且對於長期持有者,特別規定予以減徵應納稅額,以降低土地移轉應納稅負之固定成本,增進不動交易之活絡。 然而,有關土地租稅制度之基礎原則--倍數累進,此次修法並未加以一併檢討修正,仍然維持倍數累進之基礎,自無法解決現行土地稅制向來之困頓與爭議。況且,現行倍數累進方式,對於稅賦追求之目標-公平及正義,以及租稅之正當性與合理性問題,仍舊無法謀求因應改革之道。比較二次戰後,先進國家就土地增值之課稅制度,採行資本投資利得之概念,回歸到所得稅體系,放棄以往的分離課稅方式,得以使相關課稅之具體措施,如降低稅率減徵、變動所得及資本損失抵減等措施,更能實現租稅之公平原則。土地增值所得既然屬於資本之投資利得,應回歸所得稅體系,並採合併課稅為宜,始能實現租稅之公平與正義。
The Legislative Yuan of R.O.C. had corrected the Land Taxation Act and the Equal Agrarian Act in Jan 30th 2005. This primate amendment contents are modify the land value increment tax in which halve imposition and land long-term holder could abate his capital levy. Therefore, those amendments could reduce land taxation fixed cost in order to courage the capital assets market. However, this correction of related above laws didn't to modify the element principle of land taxation about multiple progressive doctrine. The multiple progressive doctrine still is the element principle about the land taxation premise so that it could not to resolves the puzzle of tax theory's contradiction about the land taxation system as usually. Besides, being keeping the multiple progressive doctrine in the land taxation system, the taxation generally object is not compliance with equal and justice of legal and seriously conflict with tax reasonableness and justify. After World War II, the developed countries have abandoned the multiple progressive doctrine in the land taxation system, abates separate taxation system, and adopt the concept of capital gain in which return to the income tax system. The new measures for income tax system of the developed countries such as taxation immunity, fluctuant incomes, and capital invest loss balance indeed perform the equality of taxation then the old taxation system dose. Because the land value increment tax essence belongs to the capital invest gain, it must to returns to the income taxation system and combine to the income taxation system and combine to the personal incomes measure in order to accomplish the equitable and justice of taxation.
期刊論文
1.Zelinsky, Edward A.(2002)。The Once And Future Property Tax: A Dialogue With My Younger Self。Cardozo law review,23,2199-2222。  new window
2.Parsley, Robert F.(2003)。Building A House Of Cards: A Policy Evaluation Of Tennessee's Tax Reform Act Of 2002 With Emphasis On Fairness To The Poor。Tennessee Law Review,70,1177。  new window
3.Eitel, Michael R.(2004)。Wyoming's Trepidation Toward Conservation Easement Legislation: A Look at Two Issues Troubling the Wyoming State Legislature。Wyoming Law Review,4(1),57。  new window
4.蔡吉源(20011100)。臺灣土地課稅制度--問題、影響與改革。臺灣土地研究,3,37-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.林桓、張格明(200312)。中小企業參與供應鏈法制研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳榮義(200510)。憲法基本國策中有關經濟政策之探討。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張格明(2000)。網路金融相關法律問題研究(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳清秀(2006)。稅法總論。臺北:元照出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳清秀(1994)。稅法之基本原理。三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳明燦(1993)。德國土地買賣價格評估基本條例。行政院經濟建設委員會健全經社法規工作小組。  延伸查詢new window
4.王建瑄(2000)。租稅法論。王建瑄。  延伸查詢new window
5.張格明(2006)。商事法理論與實務。華立圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧、吳聰敏(2001)。經濟學理論與實際。雙葉書廊有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.謝哲勝(200607)。土地法。臺灣財產法暨經濟法研究協會:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.葛克昌(200509)。稅法基本問題--學術論文集。元照出版社有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Harrison, Jeffrey L.、Morgan, Thomas D.、Verkuil, Paul R.(1997)。Regulation and Deregulation: Cases and Materials。  new window
10.凱因斯(1990)。利息、貨幣一般理論。  延伸查詢new window
11.殷章甫(2005)。土地稅。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.謝哲勝(2007)。法律經濟學。台北市:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.蔡吉源(20010517)。調降土地增値稅的政治經濟意義,財團法人國家政策研究基金會。,http://www.npf.org.tw/particle-1197-1.html, 2007/10/15。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE