:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:末期病患使用試驗藥品之憲法權利?--美國法院案例研究
書刊名:法律與生命科學
作者:葉南君
出版日期:2008
卷期:5
頁次:頁8-22
主題關鍵詞:試驗藥品憲法美國藥品管制
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:6
期刊論文
1.McGrath, Sue(2005)。Only a Matter of Time: Lessons Unlearned at the Food and Drug Administration Keep Americans at Risk。Food and Drug Law Journal,60(4),603-624。  new window
2.Heath, Wesley J.(2004)。America's First Drug Regulation Regime: The Rise and Fall of the Import Drug Act of 1848。Food and Drug Law Journal,59,169-199。  new window
3.Ely, John Hart(1973)。The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. Wade。The Yale Law Journal,82(5),920-949。  new window
4.Grooopman, Jerome(20061218)。The Right to Trial: Should Dying Patients Have Access to Experimental Drugs?。The New Yorker,2006(Dec.)。  new window
5.Kovatis, Stephen R.。The Right To Live: Do The Terminally Ill Have A Constitutional Right To Use Experimental Drugs? Abigail Alliance v. Von Eschenbach, 445 F.3d. 470 (D.C. Cir. 2006)。Temp. J. Sci. Tech. & Envtl. L.,26,149-150。  new window
6.Benderly, Beryl Lieff、涂可欣(20071100)。試驗中的藥物可用於治療嗎?。科學人,69,114-121。  延伸查詢new window
7.(20070700)。FDA修改試驗中藥物使用規則。法律與生命科學,2,41-42。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kremers, Edward(1976)。Kremers and Urdang's History of Pharmacy。  new window
2.Balkin, Jack M.(2005)。What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision。NYU Press。  new window
3.法治斌、董保城(2005)。憲法新論。元照。  延伸查詢new window
4.Rosen, Jeffery(2006)。The Most Democratic Branch: How the Courts Serve America。Oxford University press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top