:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以WTO規範探討TRIPS協定關於國家緊急情況的認定機制--從我國克流感專利強制授權案出發
書刊名:臺灣國際法季刊
作者:洪千雯
作者(外文):Hung, Chien-wen
出版日期:2007
卷期:4:1
頁次:頁159-207
主題關鍵詞:TRIPS協定杜哈宣言專利強制授權國家緊急情況克流感TRIPS agreementDoha declarationCompulsory licensingNational emergencyTamiflu
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:32
我國「克流感」專利強制授權處分係援引TRIPS協定第三十一條(b)項及「杜哈宣言」第五條(c)項,會員在國家緊急情況下所為專利強制授權規定。唯TRIPS協定第三十一條(b)項之立法範圍橫跨了GATT第XX條(b)項公共衛生例外規定與GATT第XXI條(b)項國家安全例外規定,其授與會員行政裁量權以認定國家緊急情況,而在立法架構下未為規定檢驗原則。本文檢驗TRIPS協定第三十一條(b)項在適用上若是依循WTO一般公共衛生例外規定,則必須符合其立法架構,即應符合其客觀「必要性」、科學證據、科學標準、一致性、等同等客觀標準之檢驗流程,故所需之標準較高,在運用有時效性之措施時可能會緩不濟急。若是依循國家安全例外條款之檢驗途徑,雖然評估標準較為有彈性,相形之下適用範圍較寬廣、面貌多樣化、也較為主觀,但在實證上亦需符合WTO下「例外從嚴解釋」原則與客觀上「理性國家」標準,會員可在客觀有限的範圍內彈性適用,而不得肆無忌憚無限上綱式地援引。然而,針對尚未發生的傳染病恐慌事件,應依此病毒本身的特性,例如傳染途徑、死亡率高低及所造成衝擊之大小等因素,來決定其處理步調。除了客觀上需參考國際組織(如WHO)之公告建議外,本文建議有必要另外在國內建立一套適用機制,經由國會及元首宣布進入「國家緊急情況」,再由行政院衛生署向智慧財產局申請「特許實施」,以避免GATT第XXI(b)之濫用。
The compulsory licensing of "Tamiflu" in Taiwan in Nov. 2005 is originated from the regulation of other use without the authorization of patent right holder under national emergency of TRIPS Agreement Art.31 (b) and "Doha Declaration" para.5 (c). The scope of TRIPS Agreement Art.31 (b) contains both public health and national security concerns. Public health concern is addressed by GATTΧΧ (b), and national security exception is regulated in GATTΧΧΙ. Both these provisions provide mechanisms respectively to deal with such issues, and to prevent trade distortion. It's from "Doha Declaration" para.5 (c) that clearly grants members the right to determine what constitutes a national emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency, and it being understood that public health crises represent a national emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency. However, the criteria to apply Art.31 (b) of TRIPS Agreement still remains uncertain. The article would like to examine the mechanism of Art.31 (b). If followed public health exception under WTO law, including GATTΧΧ (b), SPS Agreement, and TBT Agreement, the objective standards thus required are high, and might be time-consuming to serve in a critical situation. On the other hand, the mechanism to apply national security exception seems to be flexible and subjective. Nevertheless, two principles of "strict explanation of exception rules" and a "rational state" standard are developed to supplement the application of GATTΧΧΙ. The article suggests that the mechanism to apply Art.31 (b) of TRIPS Agreement to address public health emergency shall follow the principles in the case of national security exception.
期刊論文
1.林彩瑜(20040400)。WTO TRIPS協定下醫藥專利與公共健康之問題及其解決方向。政大法學評論,78,267-342。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Gibbs, W. Wayt、Soares, Christine、涂可欣(20051200)。全球流感防疫總動員。科學人,46,48-57。  延伸查詢new window
3.Abbott, Frederick M.(2002)。The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: Lighting a dark corner at the WTO。Journal of International Economic Law,5(2),469-505。  new window
4.Lindsay, Peter(2003)。The Ambiguity of GATT Article XXI: Subtle Success or Rampant Failure?。Duke Law Journal,52(6),1277-1313。  new window
5.Lokuge, Buddhima、Drahos, Peter、Neville, Warwick(20051026)。Pandemics, antiviral stockpiles and biosecurity in Australia: what about the generic option?。eMJA,184(1)。  new window
6.李貴英(20050700)。國際貿易與國家安全--GATT第XXI條安全例外條款之研析。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,34(4),229-282。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.洪德欽(2005)。WTO有關安全例外條款之研究。中國國際法與國際事務年報,17。  延伸查詢new window
8.Matthews, Duncan(2004)。WTO Decision on Implementation of Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: A Solution to the Access to Essential Medicines Problem?。Journal of International Economic Law,7(1),78。  new window
9.Hoen, Ellen 't(2002)。TRIPS,Pharmaceutical Patents, and Access to Essential Medicines: A Long Way from Seattle to Doha。Chicago Journal of International Law,3(1),27-48。  new window
10.Marc, Patrick(2001)。Compulsory Licensing and the South African Medicine Act of 1997: Violation or Compliance of the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement?。New York Law Journal of International & Comparative Law,21,109-125。  new window
11.牛惠之(20010600)。WTO歐體石綿爭端之研究--技術性法規、同類產品與一般例外條款。進口救濟論叢,18,33-91。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Committee o Economic(2000)。Social and Cultural Rights,Genera Comment No. 14: The right to the highest attainable standard of health。Twenty-second session,(會議日期: 25 April-12 May 2000)。  new window
研究報告
1.(1975)。Sweden-Import Restrictions on Certain Footwear。  new window
2.Yeh, Brian T.(20051118)。Influenza Antiviral Drugs and Patent Law Issues。  new window
3.Fergusson, Ian F.。The WTO, Intellectual Property Rights,and the Access to Medicines Controversy。  new window
4.Salaam-Blyther, Tiaji、Chanlett-Avery, Emma、Foreign Affairs, Defense,and Trade Division(2006)。U. S. and International Responses to the Global Spread of Avian Flu。  new window
學位論文
1.邱凱迪(2003)。WTO與貿易有關之智慧財產權協定與公共健康之研究(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊一晴(2004)。論WTO對於公共衛生議題在國際法之發展與實踐--TRIPS協定與SPS協定之研究(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱美虹(2005)。我國關於跨國性傳染病防治規範之研究---以SARS防疫為例(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林倫帆(2004)。WTO貨品貿易協定中「必要性」概念之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kolata, Gina、黃約翰(2003)。流行性感冒--1918全球大流行及致命病毒的發現。臺北:商周出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Diamond, Jared、王道還、廖月娟(2003)。槍砲病菌與鋼鐵--人類社會的命運。臺北:時報。  延伸查詢new window
3.Robinson, Jeffrey、廖月娟(2003)。一顆價值十億元的藥丸--人命與金錢的交易。臺北:時報。  延伸查詢new window
4.McNeill, William Hardy、楊玉齡(1998)。瘟疫與人:傳染病對人類歷史的衝擊。天下遠見。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(20051025)。Statement to TRIPS Council on Access to Medicine,in the Context of Avian Flu Pandemic and Other Emergencies,http://www,mhmlaw.com/mediacoverage/OctOS_IPLaw_BirdFlu.pdf。  new window
2.(2005)。The TRIPS Agreement Still Endangers Public Health,http://www.oxfam.qc,ca/html/publications/PDFpublications/etudes/lDec05.pdf。  new window
3.Gerhardsen, Tove Iren S.,New, William(2005)。Global Effort on Avian Flu Emerges Amid Policy Concerns。  new window
4.Gerhardsen, Tove Iren S.(20051210)。TRIPS Health Waiver Tied to Hong Kong Agenda。  new window
圖書論文
1.(20010213)。United Nations Commission on Human Right。The Impact of the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights on Human Rights。  new window
2.徐揮彥(2003)。與貿易有關之智慧財產權協定下有關藥品專利與健康權問題之研究。WTO新議題與新挑戰。臺北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE