:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:創意教學自我效能感量表之編制與相關研究
書刊名:教育研究與發展期刊
作者:林碧芳邱皓政 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Pi-fangChiou, Hawjeng
出版日期:2008
卷期:4:1
頁次:頁141-169
主題關鍵詞:創意教學自我效能感創意教學自我效能感驗證性因素分析Creative teachingSelf-efficacySelf-efficacy for creative teachingConfirmatory factor analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(39) 博士論文(12) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:39
  • 共同引用共同引用:178
  • 點閱點閱:195
創意教學是當前教育實踐的重要課題,而教師是否能夠勇於創新突破,表現出教學的創意,關鍵因素在於教師本身對於從事創意教學工作一種勝任與否的能力評價,亦即「創意教學自我效能感」(self-efficacy for creative teaching)。本文基於Bandura(1977)的理論觀點,將傳統的「教師自我效能感」的概念延伸至創意教學的實施,認為創意教學自我效能感是預測教師創意教學行為的具體指標,因此除了回顧創意教學與自我效能感的相關文獻,並編定「創意教學自我效能量表」,用以測量中小學教師創意教學能力的信念之個別差異。本研究以 249 名中小學教師為預試樣本,進行項目分析,並以「教師教學創新行為量表」為效標量表,以瞭解創意教學自我效能感的內在因素結構與區辨效度。進一步的,另以 554 名中小學教師為正式樣本,以驗證性因素分析進行「創意教學自我效能感」的構念效度驗證,分析結果指出量表具有良好的模式適配,信效度良好,背景變項的分析亦發現中小學教師在創意教學自我效能感的個別差異,最後,本文針對創意教學自我效能感的概念與實務上的應用提出討論。
Creative teaching is one of the most important issues in current education. The key to teaching creatively is the self-evaluation of ability and creativity. The purpose of this study is to clarify the concept of self-efficacy for creative teaching (SECT) and furthermore to develop a measurement tool for SECT. Based on Bandura’s (1977) conceptualization of self-efficacy, this study created the concept of self-efficacy specifically for school teachers doing creative teaching. A 24-item scale for measuring SECT was administered to 249 school teachers for item analysis in the pilot study. Subsequently, a sample was collected from 554 school teachers for confirmatory factor analysis and reliability estimation. Results revealed that the developed inventory-Inventory of Self-Efficacy for Creative Teaching—had satisfactory reliability and validity. A three-factor model with correlation among factors was identified as a good model for fitting the data. Finding of the analysis on background variables are reported. Finally, the significance and the implication of the Inventory of Creative Teaching Self-Efficacy are discussed.
期刊論文
1.Barfield, Vivian、Burlingame, Martin(1974)。The Pupil Control Ideology of Teachers in Selected Schools。Journal of Experimental Education,42(4),6-11。  new window
2.Tschannen-Moran, M.、Hoy, A. H.、Hoy, A. W. K.(1998)。Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measures。Review of Education Research,68(2),202-248。  new window
3.Chen, Gilad、Gully, Stanley M.、Eden, Dov(2001)。Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale。Organizational Research Methods,4(1),62-83。  new window
4.Hoover-Dempsey, K. V.、Bassler, O. C.、Brissie, J. S.(1987)。Parent involvement: contributions of teacher efficacy, school socioeconomic status, and other school characteristics。American Educational Research Journal,24(3),417-435。  new window
5.Kanter, Rosabeth Moss(1988)。When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization。Research in Organizational Behavior,10,169-211。  new window
6.Ford, C. M.(1996)。A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains。The Academy of Management Review,21(4),1112-1142。  new window
7.孫志麟(20030400)。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學報,34(2),139-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Woodman, Richard W.、Sawyer, John E.、Griffin, Ricky W.(1993)。Toward a theory of organizational creativity。The Academy of Management Review,18(2),293-321。  new window
9.Greenwood, Gordon E.、Olejnik, Stephen F.、Parkay, Forrest W.(1990)。Relationships between four teacher efficacy belief patterns and selected teacher characteristics。Journal of Research and Development in Education,23(2),102-106。  new window
10.Guskey, Thomas R.(1988)。Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation。Teaching & Teacher education,4(1),63-69。  new window
11.Barron, F. M.、Harrington, D. M.(1981)。Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality。Annual Review of Psychology,32(1),439-476。  new window
12.Newmann, F. M.、Rutter, R. A.、Smith, M. S.(1989)。Organizational factors that affect school sense of efficacy, community, and expectations。Sociology of Education,62(4),221-238。  new window
13.Gibson, Sherri D.、Dembo, Myron H.(1984)。Teacher Efficacy: A Construct Validation。Journal of Educational Psychology,76(4),569-582。  new window
14.Tierney, Pamela、Farmer, Steven M.(2002)。Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance。Academy of Management Journal,45(6),1137-1148。  new window
15.Scott, Susanne G.、Bruce, Reginald A.(1994)。Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace。Academy of Management Journal,37(3),580-607。  new window
16.Bandura, Albert(1977)。Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change。Psychological Review,84(2),191-215。  new window
17.Amabile, Teresa M.(1996)。Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,45(2),357-376。  new window
18.Amabile, Teresa M.(1988)。A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations。Research in Organizational Behavior,10(1),123-167。  new window
19.Woolfolk, Anita E.、Hoy, Wayne K.(1990)。Prospective Teachers' Sense of Efficacy and Beliefs about Control。Journal of Educational Psychology,82(1),81-91。  new window
20.Deemer, S.,、Kathleen, M.(1999)。An Investigation of the Factor Structure of the Teacher Efficacy Scales。The Journal of Educational Research,93(1),3-10。  new window
21.MacCallum, R. C.、Austin, J. T.(2000)。Applications if structural equation modeling in psychological research。Annual Review of Psychology,51,201-226。  new window
22.Rosenholtz, S.J.,、Simpson, C.(1990)。Workplace conditions and the rise and fall of teachers’ commitment。Sociology of Education,63,241-257。  new window
會議論文
1.Grafton, L. G.(1987)。The mediating influence of efficacy on conflict strategies used in educational organizations。  new window
研究報告
1.Ashton, P. T.、Webb, R. B.、Doda, N.(1983)。A study of teachers' sense of efficacy (計畫編號:No.400-79-0075)。Gainesville:Florida University。  new window
2.Armour, D., Conry-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A., Pauly, E.,、Zellman, G.(1976)。Analysis of the school preferred reading program in selected Los Angles minority schools。  new window
學位論文
1.林怡君(2002)。教師態度、自我注意、教師效能感及其因應行為的關係--以融合教育情緒障礙生為例(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪瑞峰(2000)。台北縣市國小教師效能感與家長參與班級教育活動關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳武雄(1995)。教師建設性思考與其教學自我效能、衝突解決方式之關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.魏方亭(2001)。嘉南地區國中教師工作價值觀、自我效能感及工作壓力與任教承諾關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.郭明德(1999)。國小教師自我效能、班級經營策略與班級經營成效關係之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.朱陳翰思(2002)。國民小學教師自我效能感與專業知能關係之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院,臺中。  延伸查詢new window
7.周惠民(1999)。原住民地區國小教師自我效能感與工作投入之研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
8.顏淑惠(2000)。國民小學教師情緒管理與教師效能之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
9.王受榮(1992)。我國國民中小學教師效能感及其影響因素之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.孫志麟(1991)。國民小學教師自我效能及其相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.林珈夙(1997)。校長領導風格、教師創意生活經驗、教學創新行為與學校效能之關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Byrne, Barbara M.(1994)。Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming。Sage Publications。  new window
2.Amabile, T. M.、Collins, M. A.、Conti, R.、Phillips, E.、Picariello, M.、Ruscio, J.、Whitney, D.(1996)。Creativity in Context: Updates to the Social Psychology of Creativity。Boulder, Co:Westview Press。  new window
3.邱皓政(2000)。社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Freire, Paulo(1970)。Pedagogy of the Oppressed。New York:Seabury Press。  new window
5.賈馥茗(1976)。英才教育。台北市:開明書店。  延伸查詢new window
6.張進德、楊雪蘭、朱正民(2002)。管理學--新世紀的競爭。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。  延伸查詢new window
7.邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式--LISREL的理論、技術與應用。雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
8.Bandura, A.、Wessels, S.(1997)。Self-efficacy: The exercise of self-control。New York:Freeman。  new window
圖書論文
1.毛連塭(1984)。台北市國民小學推展創造性體育課程實驗報告。創造性教學資料彙編。台北:台北市教師研習中心。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE