:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣二大供油商油價調整行為之分析
書刊名:高雄應用科技大學學報
作者:陳文生 引用關係陳丰津陳家榮
出版日期:2008
卷期:37
頁次:頁283-310
主題關鍵詞:寡占市場一致性行為平行行為OligopolyConcerted actionConscious parallel conduct
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:40
  • 點閱點閱:184
國內寡占油品市場中僅有二大供油業者,臺灣中油股份有限公司與台塑石化股份有限公司每週調整油品(汽車與柴油)批售油價之行為,幾乎存在同步同幅調整批售油價之現象,探討此現象究竟是屬於寡占市場上之一致性行為或平行行為。公平會引用「一致性行為理論」,採認市場上各種間接證據,以檢視二大供油商客觀一致性之市場行為,推論其是否存在聯合合意,以判斷二大供油商有無聯合行為。本文先探討學理上與實務上對於一致性行為之見解;接著針對目前國內油品市場批售油價同步同幅調整之現象進行檢討與分析,討論實施浮動油價機制後,二大供油商每週調整批售油價有無涉及聯合行為之問題。 國內典型的寡占油品市場,二大供油商在高度重疊的地理市場,提供完全替代性的油品,調價資訊的快速傳遞與回應等,不論有無預告調價資訊或廠商之聯合調價之合意,國內批售油價之調整,依寡占市場之特性,油價調整之變化仍會長期趨於價格一致之結果,或許必須接受這個寡占油品市場的宿命。
The purpose of this essay is to discuss the problem of the behavior of the same Oil-pricing between Chinese Petroleum Corp. and Formosa Petrochemical Corp. in the long-run Two big distributors in the domestic oligopoly oil market, once one adopt an oil-pricing strategy, the other react immediately and decide the same one, called conscious parallel conducts. Fair Trade Commission adopted the theory of concerted actions to distinguish concerted action and conscious parallel conduct, proving the existence of communications among undertaking by indirect evidence and inference from it and judging the cartel case in the oligopoly oil market. Whether providing the oil-ricing information in advance or not, the two big oil distributors will adjust the oil price to the same as soon as possible in the long run. Maybe, we should accept the predestination of the oligopoly oil market that two big oil distributors adopt the same pricing strategy for keeping the same oil price.
期刊論文
1.李幼華(20020400)。寡占市場一致性行為規範之研究。公平交易季刊,10(2),1-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Porter, Robert H.、Green, Edward J.(1984)。Noncooperative Collusion under Imperfect Price Information。Econometrica,52(1),87-100。  new window
3.陳志民(19970100)。從基點定價(Basing-Point Pricing)論平行行為與聯合行為--以美國反托辣斯法為中心。公平交易季刊,5(1),65-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃宗樂(2001)。公平交易與經濟發展。公平交易季刊,9(2),1-12。  延伸查詢new window
5.Clarke, R. N.(1983)。Collusion and the Incentive for Information Sharing。Bell Journal of Economics,14(2),383-94。  new window
6.Farrell, J.、Maskin, E.(1989)。Renegotiation in Repeated Games。Games and Economic Behavior,1(4),327-360。  new window
7.Holt, C. A.、Scheffman, D. T.(1987)。Facilitating Practices: the effects of advance notice and best-price policies。Rand Journal of Economics,20(1),123-37。  new window
8.Genesove, David、Mullin, Wallace P.(2001)。Rules, Communication and Collusion: Narrative Evidence from the Sugar Institute Case。American Economic Review,91(3),379-398。  new window
9.Logan, J. W.、Lutter, R. W.(1989)。Guaranteed Lowest Prices: Do They Facilitate Collusion?。Economics Letters,31(1),189-92。  new window
10.McCutcheon, B.(1997)。Do Meetings in Smoked-Filled Rooms Facilitate Collusion?。Journal of Political Economy,105(2),330-50。  new window
11.馬泰成(20030100)。產能與競爭。公平交易季刊,11(1),21-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳文生、陳丰津、陳家榮(20080100)。浮動油價機制之檢討。能源季刊,38(1),43-65。  延伸查詢new window
13.Abreu, Dilip(1986)。Extremal equilibria of Oligopolistic Supergames。Journal of Economic Theory,39(1),191-225。  new window
14.Cooper, Thomas E.(1986)。Most-Favored-Customer Pricing and Tacit Collusion。Rand Journal of Economics,17(3),377-388。  new window
15.Davidson, Carl、Deneckere, Raymond(1990)。Excess Capacity and Collusion。International Economic Review,31(3),521-541。  new window
16.Jin, Jim Y.(1994)。Information Sharing Through Sales Report。Journal of Industrial Economics,42(3),323-33。  new window
17.Levitan, Richard、Shubik, Martin(1972)。Price Duopoly and Capacity Constraints。International Economics Review,13(1),11-122。  new window
18.楊佳慧(20060100)。公平會處理國內二大供油商聯合調整油價之觀點。公平交易季刊,14(1),153-175。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.何之邁(20060600)。平行行為乎?一致性行為乎?--評析中油、臺塑油品調價案。臺北大學法學論叢,58,145-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.馬泰成、洪德昌(20010400)。事業聯合行為被判違法之因子分析。公平交易季刊,9(2),37-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Friedman, James W.(1971)。A Non-cooperative Equilibrium for Supergames。The Reviews of Economic Studies,38(1),1-12。  new window
22.馬泰成(20050100)。默契性聯合行為與相關案例研析。公平交易季刊,13(1),89-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Osborne, M. J.、Pitchik, C.(1983)。Profit sharing in a collusive industry。European Economic Review,22(1),59-74。  new window
24.Osborne, M. J.、Pitchik, C.(1986)。Price Competition in a Capacity-Constrained Duopoly。Journal of Economic Theory,38(2),238-60。  new window
25.Macleod, W. Bentley(1985)。A Theory of Conscious Parallelism。European Economic Review,27(1),25-44。  new window
26.Cooper, Russell、DeJong, Douglas V.、Forsythe, Robert、Ross, Thomas W.(1996)。Cooperation without Reputation: Experimental Evidence from Prisoner's Dilemma Games。Games and Economic Behavior,12(2),187-218。  new window
27.Novshek, William、Sonnenschein, Hugo(1982)。Fulfilled Expectations Cournot Duopoly with Information Acquisition and Release。The Bell Journal of Economics,13(1),214-218。  new window
會議論文
1.吳秀明(2001)。聯合行為理論與實務之回顧與展望--以構成要件之相關問題為中心。公平交易法施行九週年學術研討會,(會議日期: 2001年1月)。臺北:元照出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.熊柏青、張明宗、劉靜怡(2001)。寡占市場一致性行為之認定方法及其濫用市場地位行為規範—由Container Corp.案探討交換資訊行為。行政院公平交易委員會第七屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會,443-474。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.洪禮卿、林騰鷂、張懿云(1993)。君子協定與默契行為。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖義男、何之邁、范建德、黃銘傑、石世豪、劉華美、公平會(200312)。公平交易法之註釋研究系列(一)第一條至第十七條。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.何之邁(1993)。公平交易法專論。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.馬泰成、吳德生、侯文賢(2001)。寡占市場「一致性行為」認定方法之研究--以麵粉業為例分析。行政院公平交易委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊雲明(2007)。個體經濟學。台北:智勝文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.李沃牆(2006)。現代經濟學。台北:前程文化。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Beckman, M. J.(1965)。Edgewoth-Bertrand Duopoly Revisited III。Operations Research-Verfahren。Meisenheim am Glan:Hain。  new window
2.Hay, G. A.(1989)。Practices That Facilitate Cooperation: the Ethyl Case。The Antitrust Revolution。New York:Harper Collins Publishers。  new window
3.Edgeworth, F. Y.(1897)。The Pure Theory of Monopoly。Papers Relating to Political Economy。London:Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE