:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:優秀大專跆拳道選手的知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究
書刊名:長榮運動休閒學刊
作者:林仁彬黃朝嘉張志青
出版日期:2008
卷期:2
頁次:頁90-100
主題關鍵詞:跆拳道獎學金教練領導凝聚力Tae-kwon-doScholarship leadership behavior and cohesion
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:85
  • 點閱點閱:63
本研究的主要目的,探討在不同性別、訓練年數、獎學金對優秀跆拳道選手在知覺領導行為和團隊凝聚力上是否有差異,並瞭解知覺領導行為和團隊凝聚力之關係。研究對象為擁有全國前三名成績之大專跆拳道選手,共94位完成兩份問卷,運動領導行為(LSS)和團隊凝聚力(GEQ)。資料經過t檢定、單因子變異數分析及皮爾遜積差相關分析,結果如下:一、大專選手知覺教練領導行為,依序為:訓練與指導、民主行為、社會支持、正面回饋、專制行為。二、在性別方面,男生選手對教練領導行為之訓練與指導及專制行為方面顯著高於女生選手;不同訓練年數及獎學金變項在教練領導行為上認知並未達顯著差異。三、在團隊凝聚力方面依序為:個人吸引、個人親和、團隊合作、團隊適應。四.不同性別及訓練年數變項在團隊凝聚力上未達顯著差異,而獎學金變項在團隊凝聚力上達顯著差異,有特別比賽獎金的選手在個人親和方面的團隊凝聚力會高於沒有獎學金的選手。五、知覺教練領導各構面與團隊凝聚力各構面大部分具有顯著相關。本研究建議,提高男生之訓練與指導和獎學金,可增進選手的參與動機,提升運動表現。
The study was investigate to the relationship of difference gender, scholarship status with leadership behavior and cohesion in tae-kwon-do players. The subjects were 40 female and 54 male student-athletes in top 3 national competition finish two questionnaires: Leadership Scale Sports lead the behavior (LSS) and group's cohesiveness (GEQ). The data was analyzed by independent t-test, Pearson's relation and one-way ANOVA. The results showed that: 1.perception leadership behavior: training instruction, democratic behavior, social support, positive feedback and autocratic behavior. 2. In the gender variable, male players was had significant high than female players on training instruction and autocratic behavior. The training time and scholarship variables were not significant difference on perception of leadership behavior. 3. The order of team cohesion is GIS, GIT, ATGT and ATGS. 4. The gender and training time variables were significant difference on team cohesion, but the scholarship variable was not. The special scholarship players were had high GIT than no scholarship players. 5. There's positive relationship of training instruction with social support and positive feedback. There's negative relation of autocratic behavior and GIS. The researcher suggest improve mal training instruction and scholarship to promote athlete participate motivation and sport performance.
期刊論文
1.Salmincs, S.、Luhtanen, P.(1998)。Cohesion predicts success in junior ice hockey。Percept Motor Skills,87(2),649-650。  new window
2.Carron, A. V.、Bray, S. R.、Eys, M. A.(2002)。Teams cohesion and team success in sport。Journal Sports Science,20(2),119-1226。  new window
3.Beam, J. W.、Serwatka, T. S.、Wilson, W. J.(2004)。Preferred leadership of NCAA division I and II intercollegiate student-athletes。Journal of Sport Behavior,27(1),3-17。  new window
4.Spink, K. S.、Carron, A. B.(1994)。Group cohesion effects in exercise classes。Small Group Research,25(1),26-42。  new window
5.李柳汶(20030300)。大專甲組跆拳道教練領導行為之研究。體育學報,34,113-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Mohsen, K.、Heather, S.、Young, S. C.(2005)。Pre-competition habits and injuries in Tae-kwon-do athletes。BMC Musculoskelet Disord,6,26。  new window
7.Chclladurai, P.、Saleh, S. D.(1980)。Dimensions of leadership behavior in sports Development of a leadership scale。Journal of Sport Psychology,2(1),34-45。  new window
8.Heuzw, P.、Raimbault, N.、Fontayne, P.(2006)。Relationships between cohesion, collective efficacy and performance inprofessional basketball teams: An examination of mediating effects。Journal Sports Science,24(1),59-68。  new window
9.Matheson, H.、Mathes, S.、Murray, M.(1997)。The effect of winning and losing on female interactive and coactive team cohesion。Journal of Sport Behavior,20(3),284-299。  new window
10.Amorose, A. J.、Horn, T. S.(2000)。Intrinsic motivation: Relationship with collegiate athletes' gender, scholarship status, and perceptions of their coaches' behavior。Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,22,63-84。  new window
11.Terry, P. C.、Howe, B. L.(1984)。Coaching preferences of athletes。Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences,9(4),188-193。  new window
12.Carron, A. V.、Chelladurai, P.(1981)。The dynamics of group cohesion in sport。Journal of Sport Psychology,3(2),123-139。  new window
13.Gardner, D. E.、Shields, D. L. L.、Bredemeier, B. J. L.、Bostrom, A.(1996)。The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and team cohesion among baseball and softball players。The Sport Psychologist,10(4),367-381。  new window
14.李麗珍、陳淑滿(20050500)。不同性別、獎學金等級選手知覺教練領導行為與內在動機之研究。臺灣運動心理學報,6,55-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Carron, A. V.、Widmeyer, W. N.、Brawley, L. R.(1985)。The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire。Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,7(3),244-266。  new window
16.蔣憶德、陳淑滿、葉志仙(20010300)。教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之相關研究。體育學報,30,195-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Dirks, Kurt T.(2000)。Trust in Leadership and Team Performance: Evidence from NCCU Basketball。Journal of Applied Psychology,85(6),1004-1012。  new window
18.Westre, Kirk R.、Weiss, Maureen R.(1991)。The relationship between perceived coaching behavior and group cohesion in high school football teams。The Sport Psychology,5(1),41-54。  new window
會議論文
1.Serpa, S.、Antunes, I.(1989)。Leadership styles of elite Portuguese women's volleyball coaches。The 6th International Congress on Sport Psychology。Lathti。  new window
2.Ryan, E. D.(1977)。Attribution, intrinsic motivation and athletics。Chicago:Office of Publications Serves。346-353。  new window
圖書
1.Martens, Rainer(1987)。Coaches guide to sport psychology。Human Kinetics Publishers。  new window
圖書論文
1.Widmeyer, W. N.、Carron, A. V.、Brawley, L. R.(1993)。Group cohesion in sport and exercise。Handbook of research on sport psychology。New York:Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
2.Ryan, E. D.(1980)。Attribution, Intrinsic Motivation, and Athletics: A replication and extension。Psychology of Motor Behavior and Sport。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE