:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論羅傑.弗萊的「藝術即形式」
書刊名:人文社會學報. 國立臺灣科技大學
作者:張瀛太
作者(外文):Chang, Ying-tai
出版日期:2008
卷期:4
頁次:頁25-47
主題關鍵詞:羅傑弗萊美學形式主義造形圖象詩Roger FryAestheticsFormalismPlasticPicture poetry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:699
  • 點閱點閱:36
羅傑‧弗萊,二十世紀初著名的形式主義批評家。主張以「形象直覺」獨立的欣賞藝術品,並創導「純粹的藝術形式」為最高藝術準則。弗萊的美學論述最大的貢獻,在於提供一種純審美的評論,使藝術美擺脫世俗價值的依附性,啟發人們對造形性藝術的正確欣賞態度,有助於將藝術回歸到藝術本身,確立藝術的獨立生命和審美特質,也便於抽象藝術的普及和接受度。但他雖主張把形式獨立於社會內容之外,卻沒法說明何謂「純形式」,而其定義方式又是以審美情感和形式互為定義,以致無法產生明確的審美規範,因此,亦未能解決藝術品的美醜或好壞的判斷問題。
Roger Fry is a well-known formalistic critic in the early 20th century. He advocates for independent "intuitive" appreciation of art and also using "pure artistic form" as the highest artistic standard. The biggest contribution that Fry has for artistic appreciation is providing a puristic appreciation of art which allows art to be independent of "social" value. It also inspires an appropriate attitude to appreciate "image" art and this helps to return art back to art itself. This also ensures the independenceof art and characteristics of appreciation of art. Furthermore, this perspective also make it easier for the dissemenation and acceptance of abstract art. However, although Fry advocates having "image" independent of social content, what "pure image" means was not explained. Also, his way of defining is based on appreciative affection and image which prevent clear cut appreciation standards. Therefore, his perspective cannot solve the problem of how to judge whether an art is beautiful or not and good or bad.
期刊論文
1.詹冰(19661015)。水牛圖。笠詩社雙月刊,15。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.詹冰(1965)。綠血球。臺中:笠詩刊社。  延伸查詢new window
2.王朝聞(1989)。美學概論。台北:谷風出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉昌元(1991)。西方美學導論。臺北:聯經出版事業股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Fr, Roger、Bullen, J. B.(1981)。Vioion and Desigen。London:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Hanslick, Eduard、Cohen, Gustav、Writz, Morris(1957)。The Beautiful in Music: a contribution to the revised of musical aesthetics。New York:Liberal Arts Press。  new window
6.Stolnitz, Jerome(1960)。Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art Criticism。Boston:Houghton Mifflin。  new window
7.Paolucci, Henry、Paolucci, Anne(1962)。Hegel on Tragedy。New York:Anchor Books。  new window
8.Butcher, S. H.(1951)。Aristotle's Theory of Poetry and Fine Art。New York:Dover。  new window
9.劉文潭(1991)。現代美學。臺北市:臺灣商務印書館。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.白萩(19710700)。白萩詩選。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.呂興昌、林亨泰(1998)。林亨泰全集。彰化市:彰化縣立文化中心。  延伸查詢new window
12.Arnheim, Rudolf、李長俊(1982)。藝術與視覺心理學。臺北:雄獅圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.姚一葦(1966)。詩學箋註。臺北:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.朱光潛(1987)。美學再出發。臺北:丹青圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.朱光潛(1984)。文藝心理學。台北:臺灣開明書店。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bel, Clive(1958)。Significant Form。Art。New York:Capricorn Books。  new window
2.Fry, Roger(1926)。Art as Form。Transformations。London。  new window
3.Reid, Louis Amaud(1973)。A Criticism of Art as Form。A Study in Aesthetic。Westport, Conn:Greenwood Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE