:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:魏晉玄學家「無為而治」的政治思想與實踐
書刊名:興大中文學報
作者:馬行誼 引用關係
作者(外文):Ma Hsing-yi
出版日期:2008
卷期:23
頁次:頁155-181
主題關鍵詞:魏晉玄學無為而治政治哲學Wei Jin Xuan XueWei Jin metaphysicsWu Wei Er ZhiTo govern by doing nothing that goes against naturePolitical philosophy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:387
  • 點閱點閱:31
「無為而治」是中國傳統政治思想所嚮往的理想境界,自先秦以來,儒、道、法三家對此均提出各具特色的思想內涵。時至秦漢,思想家揉合諸子而產生的黃老之學,不僅為「無為而治」的觀念提供思想的養分,也為新興的帝國建構了理想的政治架構。魏晉玄學家踵武前賢,反思時代之弊,以道家的學術思想為核心,再次融合各家以往的「無為而治」成績,繼而整理出嶄新的思想體系,期望作為亂世中統治者施政的參考。本文從「『無為而治』思想的形成背景」、「『無為而治』思想的理論基礎」、「君主的心態與做法」、「『有為』與『無為』的關係」等四個方面討論魏晉玄學家「無為而治」的政治理想與實踐。本文所得的結論是:由於玄學的學術性格,所以無論何、王的「貴無」之說;嵇、阮的上古無為而治藍圖;郭象以「性」為主體之論等,畢竟和現實的政治運作沒有接軌。此外,玄學家即使提到君主心態和做法,以及「有為」和「無為」的關係,也只是原則性的宣示,以及現象背後價值觀的探討,所以我們僅可稱其為政治哲學或思想,實在難與儒、法思想運作下的國家機器相比擬。儘管如此,玄學家對傳統「無為而治」命題的拓深與豐富,而作為百代君主施政時的參考而言,其所代表的不朽價值,仍是值得我們一再肯定的。
"Wu Wei Er Zhi" (to govern by doing nothing that goes against nature) was the ideal world that traditional Chinese political thoughts expected to achieve. Schools of Confucianism, Taoism, and Law all proposed their own thoughts toward it since pre-Qin dynasty. Time to Qin and Han, "Huang Lao Zhi Zue," that thinkers fused various schools not only provided nutrition to the idea of "Wu Wei Er Zhi" but also constructed the ideal political structure of newly risen empire. Metaphysicians in Wei Jin tagged along behind the predecessors to examine the maladministration in the time and then integrated various schools' thoughts of "Wu Wei Er Zhi" in the sense of Taoism. Furthermore, they developed brand new system of thoughts and expected to be the reference of rulers in the trouble times. The study discussed the political thoughts and practice of "Wu Wei Er Zhi" in Wei Jin metaphysicians in four aspects: background of "Wu Wei Er Zhi," theory foundation of "Wu Wei Er Zhi," attitudes and actions of a liege lord, and relationship of "You Wei" (doing something) and "Wu Wei" (doing nothing). However, due to the scholarly characteristics of metaphysics, scholarly thoughts did not connect to politics in the reality, no matter "Gue Wu" of Ho Yen and Wang Bi, "Blueprint of Wu Wei Er Zhi" of Ji Kang and Ruan Ji, and "Ontology of human nature" of Guo Xiang ever tried. In addition, metaphysicians only made an announcement in a matter of principle and discussed the values behind the phenomenon, even they mentioned the attitudes and actions of a liege lord and relationship of "You wei' and "Wu Wei." Therefore, researchers could only name it as political philosophy or thoughts but not compare as a nation ruled by schools of Confucianism and Law. However, the proposition of "Wu Wei Er Zhi" of metaphysicians was rich and in depth, and it represented the immortal merit of political references which should be valued.
期刊論文
1.馬行誼(20060600)。阮籍的群我意識。逢甲人文社會學報,12,103-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.葛榮晉(2001)。論「無為」思想的學派性。齊魯學刊,160,20-28。  延伸查詢new window
3.周大興(19930300)。阮籍「樂論」的儒道性格評議。中國文化月刊,161,61-80。  延伸查詢new window
4.馬行誼(20051200)。王弼《周易注》的詮釋策略與思想內涵。逢甲人文社會學報,11,57-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.馬行誼(20060600)。試論阮籍著作中理想人格的塑造與衝突。臺中教育大學學報. 人文藝術類,20(1),31-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.王曉毅(2001)。郭象「性」本體論初探。哲學研究,2001(9),32-38。  延伸查詢new window
7.馬行誼(2005)。試論王弼《老子注》的思想脈絡。臺中教育大學學報:人文藝術類,19(2),53-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.劉笑敢(1996)。"無為"思想的發展─從《老子》到《淮南子》。中華文化論壇,1996(2),93-100。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳廉忠(1990)。淮南子譯注。淮南子譯注。長春。  延伸查詢new window
2.田文棠(1994)。阮籍評傳--慷慨任氣的一生。南寧:廣西教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.賀昌群、湯用彤(1984)。魏晉思想。台北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.(唐)房玄齡。新校本晉書。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.許建良(2003)。魏晉玄學倫理思想研究。北京。  延伸查詢new window
6.林家驪、阮籍(2001)。新譯阮籍詩文集。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳寅恪(19770601)。陳寅恪先生論文集。臺北:九思出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.何晏、邢昺(2001)。十三經注疏.論語注疏。臺北市:藝文印書館股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.陶建國(1986)。兩漢魏晉之道家思想。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.司馬遷、瀧川龜太郎(198210)。史記會注考證。臺北:洪氏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.丁冠之(1982)。《中國古代著名哲學家評傳‧阮籍》。濟南:齊魯書社。  延伸查詢new window
12.高晨陽(1997)。阮籍評傳。南京:南京大學。  延伸查詢new window
13.劉義慶、劉孝標、余嘉錫(1989)。世說新語箋疏。臺北:華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.余英時(1997)。中國知識階層史論.古代篇。臺北:聯經出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.余敦康(1998)。中國哲學論集。瀋陽:遼寧大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.辛旗(1996)。阮籍。臺北市:東大圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
17.王曉毅(2003)。儒釋道與魏晉玄學形成。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.曾春海(2003)。兩漢魏晉哲學史。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.任繼愈、孔繁(1998)。中國哲學發展史。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.張岱年(1982)。中國哲學大綱:中國哲學問題史。中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.湯一介(1999)。郭象。東大圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
22.丘為君(1981)。自然與名教--漢晉思想的轉折。臺北:木鐸出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.王葆玹(1996)。玄學通論。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
24.張蓓蓓(1991)。中古學術論略。大安出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.傅偉勳(19900000)。從創造的詮釋學到大乘佛學:「哲學與宗教」四集。臺北:東大。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.阮籍、陳伯君(1987)。阮籍集校注。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
27.許抗生、李中華、陳戰國、那薇(1989)。魏晉玄學史。陝西師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
28.牟宗三(1989)。才性與玄理。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
29.老聃、王弼、樓宇烈(1983)。老子周易王弼注校釋。臺北:華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
30.呂不韋、高誘、陳奇猷(1985)。呂氏春秋校釋。華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
31.黃漢光(20000000)。黃老之學析論。臺北:鵝湖。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.康中乾(1995)。有無之辨─魏晉玄學本體思想再解讀。有無之辨─魏晉玄學本體思想再解讀。北京。  延伸查詢new window
33.郭梨華(2003)。王弼之自然與名教。王弼之自然與名教。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.丁原明(2005)。黃老學論綱。山東濟南:山東大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
35.李澤厚(1990)。中國古代思想史。中國古代思想史。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(劉宋)范曄。後漢書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(戰國)韓非。韓非子集釋。  延伸查詢new window
3.(清)郭慶藩。莊子集釋,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(魏)稽康,戴明揚。稽康集校注,北京。  延伸查詢new window
5.(晉)陳壽,(南朝宋)裴松之。三國志。  延伸查詢new window
6.(清)嚴可均。全上古三代秦漢三國六朝文,北京。  延伸查詢new window
7.(清)趙翼,王樹民。二十二史剳記校證。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE