A hypothesis suggested by the late Wang Liqi 王利器 that the composition of the Lüshi chunqiu 呂氏春秋 should be in the order of the Six lun 六論, Twelve ji 十二紀, and Eight lan 八覽 is questionable. The evidence is mainly from the commentaries of Gao You 高誘. However, some of his evidence stemmed from misunderstanding the textual context, as Wang did not understand well the stylistic rules in Gao You’s commentaries. This article culls contrary evidence from the commentaries of Gao You to prove that there is still room to rethink the hypothesis and to expound on the original order of the Six lun, Twelve ji, and Eight lan. Another argument made in this article is that the Twelve ji seem to have been a separate work compiled earlier than the Eight lan and Six lun. The evidence comes from the preface of the Lüshi chunqiu entitled “Xuyi” 序意 which mentions the Twelve ji ahead of the lan or the lun. Thus the order of the lun, ji, and lan suggested by Wang is untenable. This article further points out that none of the illustrative stories introduced by the formula jie zai hu 解在乎 (the explanation lies in) is found in the Twelve ji, probably because they were composed before the Eight lan and Six lun. Based on the above agreements, this article concludes that the order of the Twelve ji, Eight lan, and Six lun in the extant Lüshi chunqiu reflects the order in which the three parts were compiled.