臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：應用模糊層級分析法比較專家判斷之差異：以臺灣業界科技專案為例
書刊名：中山管理評論
作者：黃啟誠／朱斌妤 引用關係／蔣侑修
作者(外文)：Huang, Chi-cheng／Chu, Pin-yu／Chiang, Yu-hsiu
出版日期：2008
卷期：16:3
頁次：頁429-463
主題關鍵詞：科技專案；模糊層級分析；模擬；Government-sponsored technology project；Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process；Simulation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:25
  • 點閱點閱:68
我國經濟部自1979年積極推動科技專案，透過專家學者審查以經費補助企業從事研究發展。然而，不同產業領域的申請計畫由不同領域的專家群體審查，不同領域的專家群體在審查決策過程中可能產生決策衝突。本研究從專家群體決策角度出發，運用模糊層級分析法分析不同領域業界科技專案評審委員對於該模式的判斷，同時使用模擬來分析不同領域業界科技專案評審委員面臨不確定下對該模式的判斷變動。研究結果顯示：(1)不同領域評審委員最重視的決策準則有差異，(2)不確定性程度會影響不同領域評審委員對決策準則之重要性判斷。依據研究結果建議業界科專審查應建立決策衝突的解決機制，使得評審過程更有效率以及更透明化與公開化。
Taiwan has launched various government-sponsored technology development programs since 1979 and has provided funding for firms to do R&D. The decision of government-sponsored technology development projects is normally made by a review committee with experts from academia, industry, and the government. It is important for project selection decision to analyze different expert judgments. In this study, we applied a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach to comparing judgments of experts from four committees and completed a simulation to analyze changes of criteria weights under different degree of uncertainty. Our results indicated that: (1) the ranking of evaluated criteria in this study shows different among four technical committees; and (2) the relative importance of evaluated criteria is changed when experts of technical committees face different degree of uncertainty. Based on results of this study, we suggest an approach to solve conflict of expert judgments in government-sponsored R&D project selection.
期刊論文
1.Trotman, K. T.、Libby, R.、Zimmer, I. R.(1987)。Member variation, recognition of expertise, and group performance。Journal of Applied Psychology，72(1)，81-87。  new window
2.Oral, M.、Kettani, O.、Lang, P.(1991)。A Methodology for Collective Evaluation and Selection of Industrial R&D Projects。Management Science，37(7)，871-885。  new window
3.Sakakibara, M.(1997)。Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan:who benefits and how。Research Policy，26(4/5)，447-473。  new window
4.Buckley, J. J.(1984)。The Multiple Judge, Multiple Criteria Ranking Problem: A Fuzzy Set Approach。Fuzzy Sets and Systems，13(1)，25-37。  new window
5.Hsu, Y. G.、Tzeng, G. H.、Shyu, J. Z.(2003)。Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Selection of Government: Sponsored Frontier Technology R&D Projects。R&D Management，33(5)，539-551。  new window
6.Huang, C. C.、Chu, P. Y.、Chiang, Y. H.(2008)。A Fuzzy AHP Application in Government- sponsored R&D Project Selection。Omega: International Journal of Management Science，36(6)，1038-1052。  new window
7.Kwong, C. K.、Bai, H.(2002)。A Fuzzy AHP Approach to the Determination of Importance Weights of Customer Requirements in Quality Function Deployment。Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing，13(5)，367-377。  new window
8.陳振東(20000700)。考量決策者樂觀態度傾向的模糊多準則決策方法之研究。管理與系統，7(3)，379-394。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Martin, S.、Scott, J. T.(2000)。The Nature of Innovation Market Failure and the Design of Public Support for Private Innovation。Research Policy，29(4/5)，437-447。  new window
10.Lerner, J.(1999)。The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR program。Journal of Business，72(3)，285-318。  new window
11.Levy, David M.、Terleckyj, Nestor E.(1983)。Effects of government R&D on private R&D investment and productivity: a macroeconomic analysis。Bell Journal of Economics，14(2)，551-561。  new window
12.Meade, L. M.、Presley, A.(2002)。R&D Project Selection Using the Analytic Network Process。IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management，49(1)，59-66。  new window
13.Salmenkaita, J. P.、Salo, A.(2002)。Rationales for Government Intervention in the Commercialization of New Technologies。Technology Analysis & Strategic Management，14(2)，183-200。  new window
14.Csutora, R.、Buckley, J. J.(2001)。Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: The Lambda-Max method。Fuzzy Sets and Systems，120(2)，181-195。  new window
15.Buckley, James J.(1985)。Fuzzy hierarchical analysis。Fuzzy Sets and Systems，17(3)，233-247。  new window
16.Audretsch, David B.、Link, Albert N.、Scott,John T.(2002)。Public/private Technology Partnerships: Evaluating SBIR-supported Research。Research Policy，31(1)，145-158。  new window
17.Chen, Chen-Tung(2000)。Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-making under Fuzzy Environment。Fuzzy Sets and Systems，114(1)，1-9。  new window
18.Zadeh, Lotfi Asker(1965)。Fuzzy sets。Information and Control，8(3)，338-353。  new window
19.Shih, Hsu-Shih、Shyur, Huan-Jyh、Lee, E. Stanley(2007)。An Extension of TOPSIS for Group Decision Making。Mathematical and Computer Modelling，45(7/8)，801-813。  new window
20.徐村和、楊宗欣(20000100)。應用模糊層級分析法評選廣告媒體。管理與系統，7(1)，19-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Yeh, C. -H.、Deng, H.、Chang, Y. -H.、Yeh, C. H.、Chang, Y. H.(2000)。Fuzzy multicriteria analysis for performance evaluation of bus companies。European Journal of Operational Research，126(3)，1-15。  new window
22.Hackman, J. R.、Morris, C. G.(1975)。Group Tasks, Group Interaction Processes, and Group Performance Effectiveness: A Review and Proposed Integration。Advances in Experimental Social Psychology，8，45-99。  new window
23.Forman, E.、Peniwati, K.(1998)。Aggregating Individual Judgments and Priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process。European Journal of Operational Research，108(1)，165-169。  new window
24.Sage, A. P.(1981)。Behavioral and Organizational Considerations in the Design of Information Systems and Processes for Planning and Decision Support。IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics，11(9)，640-678。  new window
25.Cetron, M.、Martino, J.、Roepcke, L.(1967)。The Selection of R&D Program Content-survey of Quantitative Methods。IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management，14(1)，4-13。  new window
26.Aull-Hyde, R.、Erdogan, S.、Duke, J. M.(2006)。An Experiment on the Consistency of Aggregated Comparison Matrices in AHP。European Journal of Operational Research，171(1)，290-295。  new window
27.Van Dyk, E.、Smith, D. G.(1990)。R&D Portfolio Selection by Using Qualitative Pairwise Comparisons。Omega: The International Journal of Management Science，18(6)，583-594。  new window
28.Lootsma, F. A.(1993)。Scale Sensitivity in a Multiplicative Variant of the AHP and SMART。Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis，2(2)，87-110。  new window
29.Baker, M. R.、Freeland, J.(1975)。Recent Advances in R&D Benefit Measurement and Project Selection: Where We Stand。IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management，21(10)，1164-1175。  new window
30.Baker, N. R.(1974)。R&D Project Selection Models: An Assessment。IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management，21(2)，165-171。  new window
31.Deng, H.(1999)。Multicriteria Analysis with Fuzzy Pairwise Comparison。International Journal of Approximate Reasoning，21(3)，215-231。  new window
32.Castore, C. H.、Murnighan, J. K.(1978)。Determinants of Support for Group Decisions。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance，22(1)，75-92。  new window
33.Ghasemzadeh, F.、Archer, N. P.(2000)。Project Portfolio Selection through Decision Support。Decision Support Systems，29(1)，73-88。  new window
34.Sounder, W. E.、Mandakovic, T.(1986)。R&D Project Selection Models。Research Technology Management，29(4)，36-42。  new window
35.Klette, T. J.、Jarle, M.、Zvi, G.(2000)。Do Subsidies to Commercial R&D Reduce Market Failures? Microeconometric Evaluation Studies。Research Policy，29(4/ 5)，471-495。  new window
36.Liberatore, M. J.、Titus, G. J.(1983)。The Practice of Management Science in R&D Project Management。Management Science，29(8)，962-975。  new window
37.Wallsten, S. J.(2000)。The Effects of Government-industry R&D Programs on Private R&D: The Case of Small Business Innovation Research Program。The RAND Journal of Economics，31(1)，82-100。  new window
38.Chien, C. F.(2002)。A Portfolio-evaluation Framework for Selecting R&D Project。R&D Management，32(4)，359-369。  new window
39.Liberatore, M. J.(1987)。An Extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Industrial R&D Project Selection and Resource Allocation。IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management，34(1)，12-18。  new window
40.Sevastjanov, P.、Figat, P.(2007)。Aggregation of Aggregating Modes in MCDM: Synthesis of Type 2 and Level 2 Fuzzy Sets。Omega: The International Journal of Management Science，35(5)，503-523。  new window
41.Hall, D.、Nauda, A.(1990)。An Interactive Approach for Selecting IR&D Projects。IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management，37(2)，126-133。  new window
42.Schmidt, R. L.、Freeland, J. R.(1992)。Recent Progress in Modeling R&D Project-selection Processes。IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management，39(2)，189-201。  new window
43.Ono, K.、Davis, J. H.(1988)。Individual Judgment and Group Interaction: A Variable Perspectives Approach。Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes，41(2)，211-232。  new window
44.Stewart, T. J.(1991)。Multi-criteria Decision Support System for R&D Project Selection。The Journal of the Operational Research Society，42(1)，17-26。  new window
45.Tindale, R. S.(1989)。Group vs Individual Information Processing: The Effects of Outcome Feedback on Decision Making。Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes，44(3)，454-473。  new window
46.Henriksen, A. D.、Traynor, A. J.(1999)。A Practical R&D Project-selection Scoring Tool。IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management，46(2)，158-170。  new window
47.Greiner, M. A.、Fowler, J. W.、Shunk, D. L.、Carlyle, W. M.、McNutt, R. T.(2003)。Approach Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Integer Programming to Screen Weapon Systems Projects。IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management，50(2)，192-203。  new window
48.Wei, Q.、Yan, H.、Ma, J.、Fan, Z.(2000)。A Compromise Weight for Multi-criteria Group Decision Making with Individual Preference。Journal of the Operational Research Society，51(5)，625-634。  new window
49.Wang, K.、Wang, C. K.、Hu, C.(2005)。Analytic Hierarchy Process with Fuzzy Scoring in Evaluating Multidisciplinary R&D Projects in China。IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management，52(1)，119-129。  new window
50.Garcia-Quevedo, J.(2004)。Do Public Subsidies Complement Business R&D? A Meta-analysis of the Econometric Evidence。KYKLOS，57(1)，87-102。  new window
51.Cheng, C. H.、Mon, D. L.(1994)。Evaluation Weapon System by AHP Based on Fuzzy Scales。Fuzzy Sets and Systems，63(1)，1-10。  new window
52.Timmermans, D.、Vlek, C.(1996)。Effects on Decision Quality of Supporting Multi-attribute Evaluation in Groups。Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes，68(2)，158-170。  new window
53.Ramanathan, R.、Ganesh, L. S.(1994)。Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: an evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages。European Journal of Operational Research，79(2)，249-265。  new window
54.Bonner, Bryan L.、Baumann, Michael R.、Dalal, Reeshad S.(2002)。The Effects of Member Expertise on Group Decision-making and Performance。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance，88(2)，719-736。  new window
55.Lootsma, F. A.(1996)。A Model for the Relative Importance of the Criteria in the Multiplicative AHP and SMART。European Journal of Operational Research，94(3)，467-476。  new window
會議論文
1.Kuo, Y. L.、Yeh, C. H.、Chau, R.(2003)。A Validation Procedure for Fuzzy Multiattribute Decision Making。0。  new window
2.Baron, J.(1998)。Do SBIR/STTR Program Manager。0。  new window
3.Yeh, C. H.、Deng, H.(1997)。An Algorithm for Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making。Beijing, PRC。  new window
4.Chu, P. Y.(1996)。An Assessment of Group Decision-making Theories and Support Technologies。The First Asia Pacific DSI Conference，413-420。  new window
5.Linto, J. D.、Walsh, S. T.、Kirchhoff, B. A.、Morabito, J.、Merges, M.(2000)。Selection of R&D Projects in a Portfolio。0。  new window
學位論文
1.Lee, A. R.(1995)。Application of Modified Fuzzy AHP Method to Analyze Bolting. Sequence of Structural Joints，0。  new window
圖書
1.Keeney, R. L.、Raiffa, H.(1976)。Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs。New York：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
2.Zeleny, M.(1982)。Multiple Criteria Decision Making。New York：North-Holland。  new window
3.鄧振源(2002)。計畫評估：方法與應用。國立臺灣海洋大學運籌規劃與管理研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
4.Saaty, Thomas L.(1980)。The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation。McGraw-Hill。  new window
5.Rothwell, R.、Zegveld, W.(1981)。Industryal Innovation and Public Policy。Industryal Innovation and Public Policy。London, UK。  new window
圖書論文
1.Arrow, K. J.(1962)。Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for innovation。The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors。Princeton, NJ：Princeton Univer­sity Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：810（臺灣：800，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2413552 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68222019
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上