:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從患者就醫場所的選擇看轉診制度之落實
書刊名:社會科學論叢
作者:洪乙禎 引用關係林錦鴻
作者(外文):Hong, Yi-chenLin, Jin-hong
出版日期:2008
卷期:2:1
頁次:頁62-89
主題關鍵詞:轉診制度越級就醫封閉式醫療體系部分負擔ReferralSelf-referClosed health care systemCo-payment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:20
  • 點閱點閱:137
本文依據臺灣封閉式醫療體系以及患者有就醫選擇自由的現況,設計一個兩階段的模型,描述患者、醫療院所雙方在健保制度下的互動,探討患者越級就醫或配合轉診的誘因。本文的研究結果顯示,封閉式醫療體系下,不同規模的醫院最終帶給患者的醫療效果有所差異,所以患者是考量醫院的行為、進而做出就醫場所的選擇。患者就醫場所的選擇除了考量成本面因素,亦同時受到效益面因素的影響,也就是不同醫院的治療效率。再者,本文也從患者選擇醫院規模的誘因看出,調整部分負擔僅能改變貨幣成本所形成的財務誘因,但無關乎不同醫院為患者創造的療效,所以,調整部分負擔的單一措施不見得能收到落實轉診的成效。在臺灣封閉式體系與就醫自由的先天條件下,落實轉診與分級就醫的目標,除了加重越級就醫的部分負擔,也可以由健保支付制度設計以及醫療院所整合等方面著手,給予基層醫療和醫院適當的財務誘因,進而有助於提高患者配合轉診的意願。
In Taiwan, the health care system is closed-form and non-gate-keeping. This study explains patients' choices and practitioners' referrals according to a two-stage model. The results show that a patient's hospital or clinic choice depended on not only the co-payment, but also the benefit consideration. This was because hospitals and clinics in the closed-form system might provide services with different treatment efficiencies. According to the incentives of patients' choices, increasing the co-payment only changed the financial incentives; however it did not affect the treatment or benefit consideration. Under the closed-form and non-gate-keeping system in Taiwan, practitioner referrals would be encouraged through the reform of the insurance payment system and the vertical integration between hospitals and clinics. This could provide hospitals and clinics with financial incentives and discourage patients' self-refer.
期刊論文
1.周鴻儒、高森永、陳育忠(19971100)。國軍醫院門診病患滿意度調查研究。國防醫學,25(5),431-438。  延伸查詢new window
2.Pauly, Mark V..(1967)。“Mixed Public and Private Financing of Education : Efficiency and Feasibility,”。The American Economic Review,vol. 57, no. 1,pp. 120~130。  new window
3.林恆慶、陳楚杰、許銘恭(20040300)。基層醫師轉檢態度之探討。臺灣家庭醫學雜誌,14(1),1-12。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉彩卿、吳佩璟(20010600)。全民健保下病患在各醫療層級間的就醫選擇--臺北市小兒科病患為例。醫務管理期刊,2(2),87-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王香蘋(20021100)。影響我國分級轉診制度發展因素的探討。弘光學報,40,45-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.謝瀛華、林英欽、林章賢、洪清霖(19950100)。基層醫療與轉診相關因子之探討。公共衛生,21(4),213-219。  延伸查詢new window
7.許碧珊、劉瑞瑤、陳曾基、黃信彰、蔡世滋、郭英調、何橈通、張茂松(20010300)。都會地區診所醫師醫療服務狀況及與醫院間轉診互動之調查。臺灣家庭醫學雜誌,11(1),22-32。  延伸查詢new window
8.邵詩媛、蔡良敏(2005)。社區醫院雙向轉診之策略規劃。醫務管理期刊,第6卷,第2期,190~200頁。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.馬震中、賴朝英、林維娟(2006)。國內某醫學中心與周邊醫療院所雙向轉診(檢)合作模式研究。醫院,第39卷,第4期,29~47頁。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳欽賢、劉彩卿、陳美吟(2005)。全民健康保險制度下之民眾就醫:感冒及慢性病。保險專刊,第21卷,第2期,113~143頁。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Franks, Peter, J Zwanziger, C Mooney, and M Sorbero.(1999)。“Variations in Primary Care Physician Referral Rates,”。Health Services Research Part 2,vol. 34, no. 1,pp. 323~329。  new window
12.Garicano, Luis and Tano Santos.(2004)。“Referrals,”。The American Economic Review,vol. 94, no. 3,pp. 499~525。  new window
13.Shea, Dennis, B. Stuart, J. Vasey, and S. Nag.(1999)。“Medicare Physician Referral Patterns,”。Health Services Research Part 2,vol. 34, no. 1,pp. 331~348。  new window
14.Shortell, Stephen M..(1973)。“Patterns of Referral among Internists in Private Practice: A Social Exchange Model,”。Journal of Health and Social Behavior,vol. 14, no. 4,pp. 335~348。  new window
15.Wagstaff, Adam and Eddy van-Doorslaer.(1992)。“Equity in the Finance of Health Care: Some International Comparisons,”。Journal of Health Economics,vol. 11, no.4,pp.361~387。  new window
研究報告
1.鄭守夏(1998)。1996年民眾選擇就醫地點的考量因素。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡文正(2001)。民眾至基層診所意願與開業醫師對醫療服務自我評價之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉美君(2006)。加重部分負擔與家庭醫師制度對轉診病患醫療資源耗用差異之研究,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Cutler, D. M.、Zechkhauser, R. J.(2000)。The anatomy of health insurance。Handbook of Health Economics。North Holland:Elsevier Science。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE