:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:洪水過後的悲憤創造--平議「創造社」北伐時期文論之轉折
書刊名:東吳中文學報
作者:黃東陽 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Tung-yang
出版日期:2008
卷期:15
頁次:頁115-134
主題關鍵詞:創造社革命文學共產主義郭沫若成仿吾Creative societyRevolutionary literatureCommunismGuo Mu RuoCheng Fang Wu
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:467
  • 點閱點閱:29
建立於五四啟蒙運動後的文學社團「創造社」,在社員多投入廣東政府的北伐行動後,轉變了原先浪漫主義的創作主張,提出「革命文學」的嶄新文論。創造社藉由自辦刊物《洪水》及《創造月刊》鼓吹「革命文學」,除了作為北伐行動的主要宣傳外,亦是共產主義的傳播窗口。本文旨在探論該社此時期的文論體系,藉由平議其中得失,來呈顯該社文論主張對北伐行動甚至於對當代的影響。得見該社無論在文學的發生、本質及批評之立論,皆亦步亦趨地追隨馬克思的唯物史觀,全然漠視文學創作裏關乎個人心靈活動與美感追求的意義,也曲解了中國文學創作思維及批評方式的傳統,反映出革命文學理論裏強烈的意識形態與政治意圖。唯由此更可細繹出:一、創造社的文論主張受當代知識青年歡迎的主要癥結,在於該社藉由「革命文學」來擘畫社會主義的富強願景,讓有志青年心生嚮往,而非文論之中的意涵;二、由於創造社用「革命文學」的題目結合北伐行動與共產思想,視北伐為革命的代名詞,並將此概念深植在當代青年的意識中,成為潛藏在北伐行動裏的最大隱憂。北伐成功後創造社雖旋即被國民黨政府所查禁,卻仍維續其影響力,讓共產黨在軍事行動失敗後仍能重掌「革命文學」的大纛,在上海振興思想的旗鼓,培養攫取政權的隱然實力。始作「革命文學」俑者的創造社,雖然其唯物史觀的文論禁不起任何檢驗,但在經過共產黨的重塑後,成為赤化中國的思想助力。
A literary association formed after the May Fourth Movement, the Creative Society changed from the original stand of romanticism in literary creation to advocating the ”Revolutionary Literature” after its members joined the Northward Expedition of the Guangdong Government. The Creative Society used its publications The Flood and Creative Monthly to advocate revolutionary literature. These two publications not only served as the main propaganda tools of the Northward Expedition, but also as the vehicles for spreading communism. The purpose of this paper is to study the system of the literary creation theory of this Society during this period and uses its merits and faults to show the impact of the Society's literary creation theory on the Northward Expedition, even the contemporary society. In the origin, essence and foundation of criticism in literature, the Society followed the historical materialism of the Marxist at each move, totally ignored the individual's spiritual activities and the pursue of estheticism in literary creation, misconstrued the tradition of creative thinking and the way of criticism in Chinese literary creation, reflected the strong ideology and the political intention in the theory of the revolutionary literature. The following can be deduced from the results of this study: 1. The main reason why the theory of literary creation of this Society was welcome by the contemporary young intellectuals was because the Society used the ”Revolutionary Literature” to paint a wealthy and powerful promised land of socialism for the youth of high ambitions to look forward to and not the meaning of the theory of literary creation; 2. The Society used the title of ”Revolutionary Literature” to unit the Northward Expedition and the Communist ideology, considering the Northward Expedition and the Communism synonyms, implanted this concept in the consciousness of the contemporary youth, thus became the most lurking danger of the Northward Expedition. Although the Creation Society was banned by the government of the Nationalist Party (KMT) soon after the success of the Northward Expedition, its influence lingered and let the Communist Party reclaim the ”Revolutionary Literature” banner even after its military defeat, became the tool for drumming up the Communist ideology in Shanghai and the secret force for seizing the political power. Although the historical materialism based literary creation theory of the Creation Society, the originator of the ”Revolutionary Literature”, could not stand any tests for its rational, yet in the political power struggle, it became the key force in communizing China by the Communists and changed the political situation in modern China.
期刊論文
1.郭沫若(19261005)。革命與文學。創造月刊,1(3),1-11。  延伸查詢new window
2.秦川(1995)。漫議創造社。郭沫若學刊,1995(3),64-70。  延伸查詢new window
3.成仿吾(1927)。文學家與個人主義。洪水,34。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭沫若(1926)。文藝家的覺悟。洪水,16。  延伸查詢new window
5.成仿吾(1926)。全部批判之必要-如何纔能轉換方向的考察。創造月刊,1(10)。  延伸查詢new window
6.成仿吾(1926)。革命文學與他的永遠性。創造月刊,1(4)。  延伸查詢new window
7.成仿吾(1927)。文學革命與趣味-覆遠中的遜君。洪水,33。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃東陽(2003)。由宗經文論詮解宋人尊杜甫為詩史之內涵。東方人文學誌,2(3),93-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張勇(2005)。創造社轉向之內在思維探源。勝利油田師範專科學校學報,19(1),1-3。  延伸查詢new window
10.成仿吾(1926)。從文學革命到革命文學。創造月刊,1(9),4-6。  延伸查詢new window
11.成仿吾(1626)。完成我們的文學革命。洪水,25。  延伸查詢new window
12.郁達夫(1926)。鴨綠江上讀後感。洪水,29,202-203。  延伸查詢new window
13.遠中遜(1927)。完成我們的文學的革命的回聲。洪水,35,500。  延伸查詢new window
14.徐克家(1927)。完成文學革命的回聲。洪水,35,500。  延伸查詢new window
15.郁達夫(1926)。無產階級專政和無產階級的文學。洪水,26,47。  延伸查詢new window
16.李怡、段從學(1998)。論作為馬克思主義倡導者「創造社」批評群體。郭沫若學刊,1998(2),50-57。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳懿(1974)。論創造社(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.柳烈(1994)。創造社研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.朱光潛(1973)。文藝心理學。文藝心理學。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.費正清、章建剛(1991)。劍橋中華民國史。上海市:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.欒梅健(1992)。二十世紀中國文學發生論。臺北:業強出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉綬松(1979)。中國新文學史初稿。北京:人民文寧出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.夏志清、劉紹銘(1979)。中國現代小說史。臺北:傳記文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Wellek, Rene、Warren, Austin、王夢鷗、許國衡(1992)。文學論:文學研究方法論。臺北:志文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.胡適(1986)。建設的文學革命論-國語的文學、文學的國語。文學改良芻議。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.金耀基(1992)。中國國家主義下知識分子的角色。中國歷史轉型時期的知識分子。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.劉增傑、趙福生、杜運通(2001)。中國現代文學思潮研究。中國現代文學思潮研究。開封。  延伸查詢new window
10.郭沫若(1985)。創造社的自我批判。創造社論。上海。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳敬之(1980)。三十年代文壇與左翼作家聯盟。三十年代文壇與左翼作家聯盟。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.Warburton, Nigel(2003)。經典哲學。經典哲學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.李何林(1932)。中國文藝論戰。中國文藝論戰。  延伸查詢new window
14.洪鎌德(1998)。馬克思。馬克思。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.王夢鷗(1987)。文人的想像與感情之隱喻。古典文學論探索。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE