臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：Toward a Discursive Basis of Public Reason in the Internet World
書刊名：東吳法律學報
作者：陳起行 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Chi-shing
出版日期：2008
卷期：19:4
頁次：頁1-30
主題關鍵詞：典範移轉；哈伯瑪斯；論述理論；互生性；公共領域；羅斯；公共理性；德沃金；裁判理論；訴訟外爭議解決；線上爭議解決；Paradigm shift；Juergen Habermas；Discourse theory；Co-originality；Public sphere；John Rawls；Public reason；Ronald Dworkin；Theory of adjudication；Alternate dispute resolution；ADR；Online dispute resolution
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:43
隨資訊科技的發展，法律的改變可以用典範移轉形容之。本文嘗試為未來法律進入下一個典範勾勒出一個可能的路徑。哈伯瑪斯(Juergen Habermas)持續以其互生(co-originality)理論批判羅斯(John Rawls)的公共理性以及德沃金(Ronald Dworkin)的裁判理論。由這個領域的理論對話出發，本文期望能導出未來法院裁判與訴訟外爭議解決機制之間相互辯證的重要性。而如何建構以論述為基礎的網路爭議解決機制便是未來法律邁向新典範的關鍵。
A paradigm shift is how the legal change after the advancement of information technology has been described. Looking for the next paradigm, this article suggests an approach to initiate the change. Rawls's concept of public reason and Dworkin's theory of adjudication form a consistent chain of thought and are consistently critiqued by the cooriginality thesis of Habermas. The discussions of their theoretical exchanges lead to an idea of public conflict resolution emphasizing the dialectic relationship between the court and alternate dispute resolution. The latter can be a discursive public sphere on the internet which is critical for leading us to the next legal paradigm.
期刊論文
1.Balkin, Jack M.(2004)。Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society。New York University Law Review，79，1-58。  new window
2.Habermas, Jürgen(1995)。Reconciliation Through The Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism。The Journal of Philosophy，92(3)，109-131。  new window
3.Rawls, John(1995)。Reply to Habermas。The Journal of Philosophy，92(3)，132-180。  new window
4.Fiss, Owen(1995)。Emerging Media Technology and the First Amendment: In Search of a New Paradigm。The Yale Law Journal，104，1613-1618。  new window
5.Chayes, Abram(1976)。The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation。Harvard Law Review，89(7)，1281-1316。  new window
6.Katsh, E.(1989)。The First Amendment and Technological Change: The New Media has a Message。George Washington Law Review，57，1459-1494。  new window
7.Marmor, A.(1991)。Coherence, Holism, and Interpretation: The Epistemic Foundations of Dworkin's Legal Theory。Law and Philosophy，10，383-412。  new window
8.MCCARTY, L. THORNE(199007)。Artificial Intelligence and Law: How to Get There from Here。Ratio Juris，3(2)，189-200。  new window
9.Fiss, Owen M.(1979)。Forward: The Forms of Justice。Harvard Law Review，93(1)，39-44。  new window
10.Pahel, K.(1985)。The Public Process of Moral Adjudication。Social Theory and Practice，11(2)，183-205。  new window
11.Fung, Archon(2003)。Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences。The Journal of Political Philosophy，11(3)，338-367。  new window
12.Gimmler, Antje(2001)。Deliberative Democracy, the Public Sphere and the Internet。Philosophy and Social Criticism，27(4)，21-39。  new window
13.Fuller, Lon L.、Winston, Kenneth I.(1978)。The Forms and Limits of Adjudication。Harvard Law Review，92(2)，353-409。  new window
14.Alexy, Robert、Peczenik, Aleksander(1990)。The Concept of Coherence And Its Significance for Discursive Rationality。Ratio Juris，3(1)，130-147。  new window
15.Levenbook, B.(1984)。The Role of Coherence in Legal Reasoning。Law And Philosophy，3，355-374。  new window
16.Bush, Vannevar(1945)。As we may think。Atlantic Monthly，176(1)，101-108。  new window
17.陳起行(20010300)。Dworkin法理學、融貫與法資訊系統。政大法學評論，65，1-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Wessel, M. R.、Wessel, R.(1986)。Alternative dispute resolution for the socio-scientific dispute。Journal of Law and Technology，1。  new window
19.Goldstein, Paul、Goldstein, P.(1997)。Copyright and Its Substitute。Wisconsin Law Review，1997，865-865。  new window
20.Shih, W.(2003)。Reconstruction Blue: A Critique of Habermasian Adjudication Theory。Suffolk University Law Review，36，331。  new window
21.Bing, J.(1978)。Legal Information Retrieval Systems: The Need for and the Design of Extremely Simple Retrieval Strategies。Computer Law Journal，1，379-379。  new window
22.Luban, D.(1998)。Rediscovering Fuller's Legal Ethics。Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics，11，801-829。  new window
23.Heng、Moor(2003)。From Habermas's Communicative Theory to Practice on the Internet。Info Systems，13。  new window
24.Baxter, H.(2002)。Habermas's Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy。Buffalo Law Review，50，205-340。  new window
25.Peczenik, A.(1994)。Why Shall Legal Reasoning Be Coherent?。ARSP-Beiheft，53，179-184。  new window
26.Davis, K.(1986)。Judicial, Legislative, and Administrative Lawmaking: A Proposed Research Service for the Supreme Court。Minnesota Law Review，71，1-1。  new window
27.Bone, R.(1995)。Lon Fuller's Theory of Adjudication and False Dichotomy between Dispute Resolution and Public Law Models of Litigation。Boston University Law Review，75，1273-1324。  new window
28.Mueller, H.(1991)。Legal Information Systems and Other Law-related Databases in Germany, Australia, and Switzerland。Law Library Journal，83，253-267。  new window
29.Jeffries, J.(1991)。Online Legal Databases: France and the European Communities。Law Library Journal，83，237-251。  new window
30.McCarty, T.(1994)。Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue。Ethics，105(1)，44-63。  new window
31.Sabel、Simon(2004)。Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Success。Harvard Law Review，117(4)，1015-1101。  new window
32.Agre, P.(2002)。Real-time Politics: The Internet and the Political Process。The Information System，18(5)，311-331。  new window
33.陳起行(2007)。寇恩新法律典範對公共線上爭議解決機制之啟發。歐美研究，37(4)，513-533。  延伸查詢new window
34.Dyzenhaus, D.(1996)。The Legitimacy of Legality。University of Toronto Law Journal，46(1)，129-180。  new window
35.McMahon, C.(2002)。Why There Is No Issue between Habermas and Rawls。The Journal of Philosophy，99(3)，111-129。  new window
36.Froomkin, A. Michael(2003)。Habermas@Discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace。Harvard Law Review，116，749-873。  new window
37.Goedan, C.(1986)。Legal Comparativists and Computerized Legal Information Systems. General Problems and the Present German Status of Computerized Legal Information。International Journal of Legal Information，1-1。  new window
會議論文
1.Fraser, Nancy(2005)。Reframing Justice in a Globalizing World。The 22nd World Congress of the International Association for Legal and Social Philosophy，85。  new window
2.陳起行(2004)。The Internet as a Forum of Law。0。159-178。  new window
圖書
1.Katsh, Ethan、Rifkin, Janet(2001)。Online dispute resolution: Resolving conflicts in cyberspace。San Francisco, CA：John Wiley ＆ Sons, Inc.。  new window
2.Allen、Saxon(1962)。Automatic Retrieval of Legal Literature: Why and How。Walter E. Meyer Research Institute of Law。  new window
3.Habermas, Jürgen、Rehg, William(1996)。Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
4.Rawls, John(1993)。Political Liberalism。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
6.Dworkin, Ronald(1986)。Law's Empire。Cambridge, MA：Belknap Press。  new window
7.Ess, C.(1996)。The political computer: Democracy, CMC, and Habermas。Philosophical perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication。New York, NY。  new window
8.Tanaka, S.(1998)。Metamorphous of the legal systems: Toward a pluralistic coordinating forum。Das recht vor der herausforderung eines neuen jahrhundents: Erwartungen in Japan und Deutschland。Tübingen, Germany。  new window
9.Michelman, Frank I.、Michelman, F.(2003)。Rawls on Constitutionalism and Constitutional Law。The Cambridge Companion to Rawls。Cambridge。  new window
10.Fuller, L.(2001)。The Forms and Limits of Adjudication。The Principles of Social Order, Selected Essays of Lon L. Fuller。Oxford, UK。  new window
11.Katsh, E.(1991)。The Electronic Media and the Transformation of Law。The Electronic Media and the Transformation of Law。New York, NY。  new window
12.(2006)。Communitarianism in Law and Society。Communitarianism in Law and Society。0。  new window
13.Habermas, J.(1998)。Paradigms of Law。Habermas on Law and Democracy。0。  new window
14.Dworkin, R.(1997)。Hard Cases, in Taking Rights Seriously。Hard Cases, in Taking Rights Seriously。0。  new window
15.McCarty, T.(1999)。Enlightenment and the Idea of Public Reason。Questioning Ethics。0。  new window
16.Rasmussen, D.(1999)。Paradigms of Public Reason: Reflections on Ethics and Democracy。Questioning Ethics。0。  new window
17.Rasmussen, D.(2001)。Accommodating Republicanism。The Edinburgh Companion to Contemporary Liberalism。0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Alexy, R.(1988)。Legal expert systems and legal theory。Expert systems in law: Impacts on legal theory and computer law。Tübingen, Germany：Attempto。  new window
2.Lucy, W.(2002)。Adjudication。The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law。Oxford, UK：Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Habermas, J.(1986)。Law as Medium and Law as Institution。Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1387（臺灣：1382，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1972506 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67772683
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上