| 期刊論文1. | 王瓊珠(20040600)。學習障礙學生鑑定問題探討--以臺北市國小為例。國小特殊教育,37,39-46。 延伸查詢 | 2. | 詹士宜(20070600)。介入效果模式的學障鑑定。特殊教育季刊,103,17-23。 延伸查詢 | 3. | 胡永崇(20051100)。以教學反應(RTI)作為學習障礙學生鑑定標準之探討。屏師特殊教育,11,1-9。 延伸查詢 | 4. | 陳淑麗、洪儷瑜、曾世杰(20070600)。轉介前介入在學障鑑定之可行性研究:以原住民低成就國小學童為例。特殊教育研究學刊,32(2),47-66。 延伸查詢 | 5. | 吳清山、林天祐(2006)。教育名詞:回應性介入。教育研究月刊,141,143。 延伸查詢 | 6. | Fairbanks, S.、Sugai, G.、Guardino, D.(2007)。Response to intervention: Examining classroom behavior support in second grade。Exceptional Children,73(3),288-310。 | 7. | Barnett, D. W.、Daly, E. J.、Jones, K. M.、Lentz, E. F.(2004)。Response to intervention: Empirically based special service decisions from single-case designs of increasing and decreasing intensity。Journal of Special Education,38(2),66-79。 | 8. | Gresham, F. M.(2005)。Response to intervention: An alternative means of identifying students as emotional disturbed。Education and Treatment of Children,28(4),328-344。 | 9. | Gerber, M. M.(2005)。Teachers are still the test: Limitations of response to instruction strategies for identifying children with learning disabilities。Journal of Learning Disabilities,38,516-523。 | 10. | Fuchs, D.、Fuchs, L. S.(2006)。Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?。Reading Research Quarterly,41(1),93-99。 | 11. | Flether, J. M.、Denton, C.、Francis, D. J.(2005)。Validity of alternative approaches for the identification of learning disabilities: Operationalizing unexpected underachievement。Journal of Learning Disabilities,38,545-552。 | 12. | Ysseldyke, J.(2005)。Assessment and decision making for students with learning disabilities: What if this is as good as it gets?。Learning Disability Quarterly,28,125-128。 | 13. | Vellution, F. R.、Scanlon, D. M.、Small, S.、Fanuele, D. P.(2006)。Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions。Journal of Learning Disabilities,39(2),157-169。 | 14. | Hale, J. B.、Kaufman, A.、Naglieri, J. A.、Kavale, K. A.(2006)。Implementation of IDEA: Intergrading response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods。Psychology in the Schools,43(7),753-770。 | 研究報告1. | 洪儷瑜(2005)。學習障礙鑑定工作檢討與建議--由「各縣市實施學習障礙學生鑑定工作調查表」談起。 延伸查詢 | 2. | 教育部特殊教育工作小組(2007)。96年度特殊教育統計年報。臺北:教育部。 延伸查詢 | 圖書1. | Brown-Chidsey, Rachel、Steege, Mark W.(2005)。Response to Intervention: Principles and Strategies for Effective Practice。New York:Guilford Press。 | 2. | 桃園縣特殊教育學生鑑定及就學輔導委員會(2006)。桃園縣九十五學年度身心障礙學生轉介鑑定安置各國中小特教業務承辦人說明會工作手冊。桃園:特殊教育學生鑑定及就學輔導委員會。 延伸查詢 | 3. | 鈕文英(2007)。擁抱個別差異的新典範:融合教育。台北:心理。 延伸查詢 | 4. | 鈕文英(2005)。融合教育的理念與作法--課程與教學規劃篇。高雄:國立高雄師範大學特殊教育中心。 延伸查詢 | 5. | Cegelka, P. T.、Berdine, W. H.(1995)。Effective instruction for students with learning disabilities。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。 | 6. | Bender, W. N.、Shores, C.(2007)。Response to intervention: A practical guide for every teacher。Reston, VA:The Council for Exceptional Children。 | 其他1. | Reschly, D. J.,Hosp, J. L.,Schmied, C. M.(20030820)。And miles to go: State SLD requirements and authoritative recommendation,http://www.nrcld.org/about/research/states/MilestoGo.pdf。 | 2. | U. S. Department of Education(2006)。Final Federal Regulations to Implement IDEA as published in the Federal Register on August 14, 2006,http://www.vesid.nysed.gov/specialed/idea/home.html。 | |