:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:進口梨潛在衝擊實證研究--COMPAS模擬分析
書刊名:華人前瞻研究
作者:黃智輝
作者(外文):Huang, Chi-huei
出版日期:2008
卷期:4:2
頁次:頁25-38
主題關鍵詞:高山梨特別防衛措施COMPAS模型關稅配額PearSpecial safeguard clauseCOMPAS modelTariff rate quota
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:48
  • 點閱點閱:32
台灣在加入WTO後,我國必須履行WTO協商之承諾,調降各類產品之進口關稅,取消各類進口管制、削減境內補貼等貿易保護措施,而農產品更是協商削減之主要對象。國內農產品在未來勢必面對低價進口品的衝擊影響,如何在短時間內快速評估產業損失,值得政府相關單位多加重視。本研究運用美國國際貿易委員會所發展的商業政策分析系統(簡稱COMPAS模型)進行農產品產業損害認定之分析,探討特定農產品(高山梨為例)若停止適用關稅配額政策時,對產業所帶來的衝擊影響。我國為避免國外農產品大量進口,影響我農民權益,本研究以高山梨(Pears)於實施關稅配額進口制度作為研究對象,並蒐集其產業及國內市場狀況之相關資料,加以研析,利用COMPAS模型預測在取消相關保護措施後所可能帶來之衝擊影響,結果發現一旦政府相關保護措施的取消,高山梨之價格、產出帶來大幅度的負面影響,本研究結果可提供我國目前正在實施之23項「關稅配額」(Tariff-Rate Quota, TRQ),其中更在15項實施特別防衛措施之產品推估其成本與收益評估指標,作為政府部門事先預為輔導開放及彌補損害之效益評估模型。
After joining WTO, however, our nation must commit to the terms specified by WTO, including lowering duties for imported products, lifting import restrictions, and reducing subsidies which are primarily focused on agricultural products. In this study, we use the Commerce Policy Analysis System (or "COMPAS" for short) developed by the International Trade Commission of the U.S. to assess the industrial losses seen in agricultural products and the impact on the industry if the needed tariff quota policies or SSG (Special Safeguard) for certain agricultural products (such as pear) are lifted. We have collected the related data on this industry and Taiwan's market for further analysis. The results of our study serve as references for the 23 tariff quotas that Taiwan is practicing, and 15 of them can serve as the references for determining the cost, benefits, and loses of products under SSG, allowing the government to provide needed support and compensations for the possible losses in advance.
期刊論文
1.黃智輝(20080600)。我國入會後農產品貿易救濟產業損害之模擬分析--以紅豆產業為例。農業經濟叢刊,13(2),135-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Shiells, C. R.、Stern, R. M.、Deardorff, A. V.(1986)。Estimates of the Elasticities of Substitution between Imports and Home Goods for the United States。Weltwirtschaftliches Archive,122(3),497-519。  new window
3.邱照仁(19970500)。Compas Methodology在產業損害認定上之運用。貿易調查專刊,2,195-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Armington, Paul S.(1969)。The Geographic Pattern of Trade and the Effects of Price changes。International Monetary Fund Staff Papers,16(1),176-199。  new window
5.Armington, P. S.(1969)。A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production。International Monetary Fund Staff Papers,16(1),159-178。  new window
6.Kelly, K. M.、Morkre, M. E.(1998)。Do Unfairly Traded Imports Injure Domestic Industries?。Review of International Economics,6(2),321-332。  new window
7.Said, S. E.、Dickey, D. A.(1985)。Hypothesis Testing in ARIMA (p, 1, q) Models。Journal of the American Statistical Association,80,369-374。  new window
8.黃智輝(20080300)。水泥課徵反傾銷稅的政策效果與競爭力分析--臺灣實證分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策,38(2),1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.黃智輝(20000100)。反傾銷稅的經濟福利效益分析。臺灣經濟金融月刊,36(1)=420,66-83。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃智輝(20031200)。反傾銷案件產業損害調查經濟效益實證分析--我國案例探討。臺灣銀行季刊,54(4),216-248。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.黃智輝(20060600)。臺灣農產品救助政策與進品救濟制度運用之效益分析。農業經濟叢刊,11(2),309-340。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.吳再益、賴英崑(1996)。美國實施反傾銷稅暨平衡稅經濟效益分析之研究。台北。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林柏生、陳坤銘、洪德欽(2002)。反傾銷制度與產業保護效果--台灣個案研究。台北。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.左峻德(1998)。課徵反傾銷稅對產業影響之研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.李淑媛、張静貞(2007)。研析特定農產品停止適用特別防衛或關稅配額之預期效果。  延伸查詢new window
5.Staiger, R. W.、Wolak, F. A.(1994)。Measuring Industry Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States。Washington D.C.:National Bureau of Economic Research。  new window
6.杜巧霞(2002)。產業損害預警模型之研究--產業損害預警模型之持續及更新。  延伸查詢new window
7.Eichengreen, B. J.、Der Ven, H. Van(1983)。U.S. Antidumping Policies: The Case of Steel。Washington, D.C.:National Bureau of Economic Research。  new window
8.Prusa, T. J.(1999)。On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping。Washington, D.C.:National Bureau of Economic Research。  new window
9.Knetter, Michael M.、Prusa, Thomas J.(2000)。Macroeconomic Factors and Antidumping Filings: Evidence from Four Countries。Washington, DC:National Bureau of Economic Research。  new window
10.Prusa, T. J.(1996)。The Trade Effects of U.S. Antidumping Actions。Washington, D.C.:National Bureau of Economic Research。  new window
學位論文
1.李淑媛(2006)。反傾銷案件產業損害認定經濟分析模型之研究-台灣型鋼產業之應用(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃智輝(2004)。世界貿易組織與進口救濟。台北:天一圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.World Trade Organization(1995)。Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations-Agreement on Agriculture。  new window
3.Francois, J. F.、Reinert, K. A.(1997)。Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Reinert, Kenneth A.、Shiells, Clinton R.(1992)。Estimated Elasticities of Substitution for Analysis of a North American Free Trade Area。Washington, D.C.:USITC, Office of Economics。  new window
5.沈筱玲(1999)。反傾銷措施裁定效應之分析--以本土個案為例。台北:天一圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.USITC(1995)。The Economic Effects of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Order and Suspension Agreements。Washington D.C.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE