:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:王安石《老子注》的道論與天人關係
書刊名:清華中文學報
作者:黃士恆
作者(外文):Huang, Shi Heng
出版日期:2008
卷期:2
頁次:頁17-44
主題關鍵詞:王安石老子有對無對物理之常禮樂刑政Wang AnshiLaozi
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:27
王安石將「道」理解為氣性本體,以道之體為元氣,道之用為沖氣,結合陰陽五行之說,成為一氣化宇宙論的生成結構。他將無有、本末切割成兩層,以無與本指道體,有與末指形名萬物。無(無形無名)與有(有形有名)分別為氣的不同形態之呈現,推演出無有相反、本末相對的架構,而有以動釋靜、以虛明強的詮釋理路,因此一切莫不有對,而發展出他所認定的天道人道的共通性。此外,他以人力之成萬物說明天道自然、人道須有為的互動結構,構成無與有、本與末的完整性,此為其論道最特殊處,也是導因於其以「氣」作為綰合,而走向道生萬物的物質自然義。最後,王安石對儒家道德之學的誤解,導致他把仁義禮智等看成是外在的觀念,為有對的物理現象。以至於王安石能夠理解老子否定仁義禮智的真正意義。此外,其站在儒家道德本位的思考下,認為須將尚賢尚德,安立在人文社會上,而成為其特殊的整合天道人道的用世思維。
In his commentary of the Laozi, Wang Anshi points out that the Way (dao 道) is the material-force (qi 氣). He contends the essence of the Way is "the original material-force" (yuanqi 元氣) and the function of the Way is "the harmonious material-force" (chongqi 沖氣). Together with the concept of “ yin-yang and the five elements ” (陰陽五行說), Wang's cosmology argues that the cosmos is made of one single kind of material-force. Wang separates the non-existent and the existent, the origin and the originated into two parts. He regards the non-existent and the origin as the Way, the existent and the originated as “the myriad things”. The Way as non-being and the myriad things as beings are two different kinds of manifestation of the material-force. Thus he deduces the structure that non-being/the origin and beings/the originated contrast and contrary to each other; and he explains the stillness and the voidness by way of the moving and the solid. Then he concludes that the heavenly Way and the human Way share the common ground; the heavenly Way self-so existes but human beings must act purposefully to let the myriad things created and last. Finally these ideas lead to the conclusion that the Way gave birth to the myriad things in a physical sense. They also show that Wang considers Confucian concepts of humanness, righteousness, propriety and wisdom are external and why he accepts part of Laozi's claims on attacking Confucian ethics. The interesting phenomenon is that while agreeing Laozi's attacking on Confucianism, Wang also emphasizes the importance of human action and prescribes an idea which is based on Confucianism to solve social and cultural issues while adopting Daoist metaphysics.
期刊論文
1.方元珍(19921200)。王安石著作考述。國立中央圖書館館刊,25(2),133-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.徐規、楊天保(200503)。走出《荊公新學》--對王安石學術演變形態的再勾勒。浙江大學學報(人文社會科學版),35(1),31-39。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊新勛、劉春華(2005)。論王安石援道入儒的思想體系。船山學刊,4,115-117。  延伸查詢new window
4.尹志華(2002)。王安石的《老子註》探微。江西社會科學,2002(11),43-48。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.司馬光(1987)。司馬文正集。台北:台灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.晁公武、孫猛(2005)。郡齋讀書志校證。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.徐復觀(1997)。中國人性論史:先秦篇。台北:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.袁保新(1969)。老子哲學之詮釋與重建。台北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.王安石、嚴靈峰(1979)。老子崇寧五注。臺北市:成文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.錢穆(1994)。莊老通辨。台北:聯經出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.王邦雄(2004)。老子的哲學。台北:東大圖書出版。  延伸查詢new window
8.容肇祖(1979)。王安石老子注輯本。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃宗羲、全祖望、王梓材、黃百家(1975)。宋元學案。臺北:河洛圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.許抗生(1993)。老子研究。台北:水牛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.張立文(1993)。宋明理學邏輯結構的演化。臺北:萬卷樓圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.牟宗三(2002)。才性與玄理。台北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.王安石(1974)。王安石全集。臺北:河洛圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.列禦寇、楊伯峻(1987)。列子集釋。華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.牟宗三(1986)。中國哲學十九講:中國哲學之簡述及其所涵蘊之問題。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.郭象、成玄英、陸德明、郭慶藩、王孝魚(2004)。莊子集釋。華正。  延伸查詢new window
17.老聃、王弼、樓宇烈(1983)。老子周易王弼注校釋。臺北:華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.馬良懷、劉韶軍、熊鐵基。中國老學史。人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.老聃、大安出版社編輯部、王弼、河上公(1999)。老子四種。臺北:大安出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE