:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學生對科學教科書詞彙關係理解之分析
書刊名:教科書研究
作者:陳世文楊文金
作者(外文):Chen, Shin-wenYang, Wen-gin
出版日期:2008
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁101-127
主題關鍵詞:詞彙關係類別關係組成關係科學教科書Lexicon relationClassificationCompositionScience textbook
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:27
類別與組成是科學教科書中兩種重要的詞彙關係,而這種詞彙關 係通常蘊含於科學教科書的論述中,本文目的即分析學生對科學教科 書論述中詞彙關係的語意理解。本研究對象包括國中學生與高中學生 共368 位,2 組學生人數各為184 位。本文從現行國中階段科學教科 書選取「物質與原子」單元的部分內容作為研究文本,並設計科學詞 彙關係問卷,學生在閱讀文本後填答試題。研究結果顯示學生能夠察 覺科學教科書論述中蘊含的類別關係與組成關係,高中學生表現較佳 的語意理解,但是仍有不少學生對類別或組成關係的識別感到困擾, 尤其是對於混合的組成關係。同時學生會從生活世界的知識經驗來解 讀科學詞彙關係,這些結果顯示學生對科學教科書所描述之詞彙關係 的理解並不精確。本文研究結果除提供科學教師教學上的參考,也建 議對於科學教科書論述的詞彙關係以及學生的理解情形有更多的重 視及探討。
“Classification” and “Composition” are two essential lexicon relations which are typically embedded within statements in science textbooks. The purpose of this study is to explore student comprehension of the Classifications and Composition relations in science textbooks. Three hundred and sixty-eight junior and senior high students participated in this study. An excerpt text was chosen from a passage on “matter and atoms” in junior high science textbooks as the treatment text and the “Science Lexicon Relation Questionnaire” was developed to detect students’ comprehension. The results revealed students could recognize the discrimination between Classification and Composition of science lexicons. Meanwhile, senior high student understanding was better than that of junior high student. However, there were some students who did not clearly comprehend either or confused the two lexicon relation, especially for the blend-composition relations. Moreover, they could explain the blend-composition from their daily common-sense. To conclude, this study might be of importance in exploring lexicon relations in science textbooks, as well as in providing scientific teachers with a better understanding of student comprehension of these lexicon relations in their science learning.
期刊論文
1.Rosch, Eleanor、Mervis, Carolyn B.、Gray, Wayne D.、Johnson, David M.、Boyes-Braem, Penny(1976)。Basic objects in natural categories。Cognitive Psychology,8(3),382-439。  new window
2.藍順德(20041200)。二十年來國內博碩士論文教科書研究之分析。國立編譯館館刊,32(4),2-25。  延伸查詢new window
3.Chaffin, R.、Herrmann, D. J.(1984)。The similarity and diversity of semantic relations。Memory and Cognition,12,134-141。  new window
4.Stasio, T.、Herrmann, D. J.、Chaffin, R.(1985)。Relation similarity as a function of agreement between relation elements。Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23(1),5-8。  new window
5.Winston, M. E., Chaffin, R.,、Herrmann, D.(1987)。A taxonomy of part-whole rela-tions。Cognitive Science,11,417-444。  new window
研究報告
1.Varzi, A.(2004)。Mereology'. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy。  new window
圖書
1.Fromkin, Victoria、Rodman, Robert(1998)。An introduction to language。New York:Harcourt Brace College Publishers。  new window
2.Eggins, S.(1994)。An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics。London, UK:Martin’s Press。  new window
3.Harms, N. C.、Yager, R. E.(1981)。What research says to the science teacher。Washington, DC:National Science Teachers Association。  new window
4.Lemke, Jay L.(1990)。Talking science: Language, learning, and values。Ablex。  new window
5.Unsworth, Len(2001)。Teaching Multiliteracies across the Curriculum: Changing Contexts of Text and Image in Classroom Practice。Buckingham:Philadelphia:Open University Press。  new window
6.Wellington, J. J.、Osborne, J.(2001)。Language and literacy in science education。Open University Press。  new window
7.Cruse, David Alan(1986)。Lexical Semantics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.林英智主編(2004)。國民中學自然與生活科技第四冊。臺北縣。  延伸查詢new window
9.Copi, I. M.(1978)。Introduction to logic (5th ed.)。New York。  new window
10.Halliday, M. A. K.,、Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.(2006)。An introduction of functional grammar (3rd ed.)。London。  new window
11.Halliday, M. A. K.(2004)。The language of science。The fifth volume of a series of the Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday。London。  new window
12.Handke, J.(1995)。The structure of the lexicon: Human versus machine。New York。  new window
13.Iris, M. A., Litowitz, B.,、Evens, M.(1988)。Problems of the part-whole relation。Relational models of the lexicon。Cambridge。  new window
14.Miller, K. J.(1998)。Modifiers in WordNet。WordNet: An electronic lexical database。Cambridge, MA。  new window
15.Murphy, M. L.(2003)。Semantic relations and the lexicon: Antonymy, synonymy and other para-digms。New York。  new window
圖書論文
1.Chi, M. T. H.(1992)。Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science。Cognitive Models of Science: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science。Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE