資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.128.26.141)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Back to the World of Light : On Tactile Subject in Melville and Merleau-Ponty
書刊名:
NTU Studies in Language and Literature
作者:
蘇秋華
作者(外文):
Su, Chiu-hua
出版日期:
2008
卷期:
20
頁次:
頁97-130
主題關鍵詞:
觸覺主體
;
光的波動說
;
梅洛龐蒂現象學
;
莫比迪克
;
笛卡爾式透視論
;
暗箱
;
Tactile subject
;
Wave theory of light
;
Merleau-Pontian Phenomenology
;
Moby-Dick
;
Cartesian Perspectivalism
;
Camera obscura
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:19
自柏拉圖以來,西方哲學傳統長久為視覺所宰制;咸以為視學霸權與笛卡爾主義沆瀣一氣,堅實了傳統認識論的基礎,在此二元思維模式中,人類心靈、理性以及意識皆大受讚揚,反之,舉凡活的存有所依附的身體感官以及物質性則遭到貶抑。當代文化研究者試圖以二十世紀歐陸哲思彌補此鴻溝,如:海德格、梅洛龐蒂、列維納斯、依希佳黑等人之思想,其中梅氏理論在回復身體重要性及重思主/客之非二元關係上極具潛力。本文將試圖說明,梅洛龐蒂及梅爾維爾雖處於完全不同的歷史脈絡中,但兩者均強調視覺與觸覺之跨侵,進而對視覺霸權提出挑戰的策略卻不謀而合。兩者對觀視的重塑相應了十九世紀在光學上的典範轉移--牛頓的粒子說被波動說所取代。在《莫比.迪克》中,梅爾維爾以新的光學理論顛覆了傳統認識論的內/外二元模式,因而豐富了當代與身體相關的討論。此一真知灼見亦說明了他和梅洛龐蒂現象學可對話之處。
以文找文
Western philosophical tradition ever since Plato has, as many culture critics show, been dominated by vision. It is widely accepted that this hegemony of vision has conspired with Cartesianism to forge the foundation of dualism for traditional epistemology which celebrates the human mind, reason, and consciousness at the cost of bodily senses and the materiality in which every living being is embedded. Scholars of contemporary cultural studies try to bridge this gap by resorting to twentieth century continental philosophers, such as Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Levinas, Irigaray, to name but a few. Among them, Merleau-Ponty has offered a promising model for reviving the body and rethinking a non-dualistic relation between subject and object. In this study, I would like to show that, although situated in historical contexts quite different from each other, Merleau-Ponty and Melville challenge the hegemony of vision in a very similar way—emphasizing the encroachment of touch and vision. Their recasting of seeing corresponds with the paradigm shift in optics at the turn of the nineteenth century, when the traditional Newtonian corpuscular theory was replaced by the new wave theory of light. With the new paradigm in mind, Melville in Moby-Dick has subverted the inside/outside dichotomy posed by traditional epistemology and made a significant contribution to contemporary discussion of the body, a revolutionary insight which marks his affinity with Merleau-Pontian phenomenology.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Ward, J. A.(1956)。The Function of the Cetalogical Chapters in Moby-Dick。American Literature,28(2),164-183。
2.
Mazis, Glen A.(1987)。'Modern Depths,' Painting, and the Novel: Turner, Melville, and the Interstices。Soundings,70(1)/70(2),121-144。
3.
Leder, Drew(1990)。Flesh and Blood: A Proposed Supplement to Merleau-Ponty。Human Studies,13,209-219。
4.
Frankel, Eugene(1976)。Corpuscular Optics and the Wave Theory of Light: The Science and Politics of a Revolution in Physics。Social Studies of Science,6,141-184。
學位論文
1.
Neal, Valerie Sue(1979)。Transcendental Optics: Science, Vision, and Imagination in the Works of Emerson and Thoreau。
圖書
1.
Melville, Herman(1967)。Moby-Dick: An Authoritative Text。Moby-Dick: An Authoritative Text。New York。
2.
Langer, Monika M.(1989)。Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception: A Guide and Commentary。Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception: A Guide and Commentary。
3.
Abram, David(1997)。The spell of the sensuous。New York。
4.
Harman, Peter Michael(1982)。Energy, Force, and Matter: The Conceptual Development of Nineteenth-Century Physics。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。
5.
Vasseleu, Cathryn(1998)。Textures of Light: Vision and Touch in Irigary, Levinas, and Merleau-Ponty。Textures of Light: Vision and Touch in Irigary, Levinas, and Merleau-Ponty。London/New York。
6.
Jay, Martin Evan(1993)。Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought。Berkeley, CA:University of California Press。
7.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice、Lingis, Alphonso(1968)。The Visible and the Invisible: Followed by Working Notes。Northwestern University Press。
8.
Crary, Jonathan(1990)。Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century。MIT Press。
9.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice、Smith, Colin(2002)。Phenomenology of Perception。Routledge。
10.
Wilson, Eric(2000)。Romantic Turbulence: Chaos, Ecology, and American Space。Romantic Turbulence: Chaos, Ecology, and American Space。London。
11.
Taylor, Charles(2005)。Merleau-Ponty and the Epistemological Picture。The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty。Cambridge。
12.
Smith, Richard Dean(1993)。Melville's Science: "Devilish Tantalization of the Gods!"。Melville's Science: "Devilish Tantalization of the Gods!"。New York。
13.
Keller, David R.、Golley, Frank B.(2000)。Rationalism and Empiricism。The Philosophy of Ecology: From Science to Synthesis。Athens。
14.
Dijksterhuis, Fooko Jan(2004)。Lenses and Wave: Christiaan Huygens and the Mathematical Science of Optics in the Seventeenth Century。Lenses and Wave: Christiaan Huygens and the Mathematical Science of Optics in the Seventeenth Century。Dordrecht。
15.
Cataldi, Sue L.(1993)。Emotion, Depth, and Flesh: A Study of Sensitive Space: Reflections on Merleau-Ponty's Philosophy of Embodiment。Emotion, Depth, and Flesh: A Study of Sensitive Space: Reflections on Merleau-Ponty's Philosophy of Embodiment。Albany。
16.
Butler, Judith(2005)。Merleau-Ponty and the Touch of Malebranche。The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty。Cambridge。
17.
Bredahl, A. Carl Jr.(1972)。Melville's Angles of Vision。Gainesville:U of Florida P。
18.
Blumenberg, Hans(1993)。Light as a Metaphor for Truth: At the Preliminary Stage of Philosophical Concept Formation。Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision。Berkeley。
19.
Beer, Gillian(1996)。'Authentic Tidings of Invisible Things': Vision and the Invisible in the Later Nineteenth Century。Vision in context: Historical and contemporary perspectives on sight。New York。
圖書論文
1.
Jay, Martin Evan(1988)。Scopic Regimes of Modernity。Vision and Visuality。Bay Press。
2.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice(1964)。Eye and Mind。The Primacy of Perception。Evanston, IL:Northwestern University Press。
3.
Crary, Jonathan(1988)。Modernizing Vision。Vision and Visuality。Seattle。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
無相關期刊論文
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
生態現象學初探:以梅洛龐蒂閱讀《莫比•迪克》,以梅爾維爾回饋梅洛龐蒂
QR Code