臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：死刑意向之性別模型分析
書刊名：犯罪與刑事司法研究
作者：謝靜琪
作者(外文)：Hsieh, Ching-chi
出版日期：2009
卷期：12
頁次：頁25-58
主題關鍵詞：死刑意向；犯罪被害恐懼；應報主義；人道主義；嚇阻作用；Death penalty；Fear of crime；Retribution；Humanitarianism；Deterrence
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:25
  • 點閱點閱:26
本研究對一大台北地區之樣本執行性別模型檢驗，採三組變項測量：象徵取向、犯罪顯著性與社會人口控制變項。本研究目的爲：一、檢驗民眾死刑意向、死刑懲處目的、犯罪被害經驗、犯罪被害恐懼與治安相關知覺之性別差異；二、檢驗死刑目的、犯罪被害經驗、犯罪被害恐懼與治安相關知覺對死刑支持之影響；三、探究與檢驗死刑意向之性別模型。多元迴歸分析發現，人道主義與應報主義皆爲二模型之顯著預測變項；性別差異則呈現於，一、人道主義於男性模型中預測力居首位，但於女性模型中居次，次於應報主義；二、男性模型中，認爲目前刑罰越嚴厲者，死刑支持程度越低，但女性模型中兩者並無顯著關係；三、男性模型中，犯罪被害恐懼越高者，死刑支持程度越低，但女性模型中此預測力並未達顯著水準；四、女性模型中，有暴力犯罪被害經驗者，死刑支持程度比無此經驗者低，但男性模型中此預測力並未達顯著水準；五、女性模型中，越認爲警察有能力處理犯罪案件，死刑支持程度越高，但男性模型中並無顯著影響。研究結果暗示，應報主義可能是死刑支持的最重要緣由，人道主義則可能是反對死刑的最主要因素，且不同性別死刑意向之緣由並非完全一致。
The current research performed a gender-specific model analysis of death penalty support on a great-Taipei-area sample, employing three sets of variables-symbolic orientations, crime salience, and socio-demographical controls. There were three objectives in the current study. The first was to examine gender differences in the death penalty support, reasons supporting death penalty, victimization, fear of crime, and perception of public safety. The second objective was to assess the influence of reasons supporting death penalty, victimization, fear of crime, and perception of public safety on the death penalty support. The third objective was to explore and examine gender-specific models. The results of a multiple regression analysis showed that humanitarianism and retribution were significant predictors in both gender models. Gender differences were also found. First of all, humanitarianism was the strongest predictor of death penalty support among males while second to retribution among females. Secondly, for men only, the more severe they perceived the current punishment, the stronger support they had for death penalty. Thirdly, for men only, the higher their fear of crime was, the less they supported for the death penalty. Fourthly, for women only, their experience of violent victimization decreased the support for death penalty. Finally, for women only, the more they believed in police’s capability in handling crime, the stronger they supported for the death penalty. The current research suggested that retribution may be the most important reason for supporting death penalty while humanitarianism the one against it, that there may be gender differences in reasons of supporting death penalty, and that different gender may not be coherent in reasons of supporting death penalty.
期刊論文
1.Smith, Tom W.(1984)。The Polls: Gender and Attitudes toward Violence。Public Opinion Quarterly，48(1)，384-396。  new window
2.謝靜琪(20000600)。犯罪被害恐懼之性別異同--從符號互動理論的觀點來研究。犯罪學期刊，5，107-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.瞿海源(20061200)。遏止犯罪、生命價值與死刑：臺灣民眾對廢除死刑的態度。臺灣社會學刊，37，133-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Lord, Charles G.、Ross, Lee、Lepper, Mark R.(1979)。Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，37(11)，2098-2109。  new window
會議論文
1.謝靜琪(2005)。籠中鳥？--檢視不同性別年齡團體之犯罪被害恐懼與其因應行為。臺北：世新大學社會心理學系。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Easton, David、Dennis, Jack(1969)。Children in the Political System: Origins of Political Legitimacy。New York, NY：McGraw-Hill。  new window
其他
1.侯崇文(1997)。治亂世用重典的民眾意向。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝靜琪(1999)。犯罪受害恐懼之性別異同--從一社會心理的觀點來探究。  延伸查詢new window
3.謝靜琪(2005b)。隱形的被害--犯罪被害恐懼初探。  延伸查詢new window
4.謝靜琪(2006a)。死刑存廢與民眾對死刑與刑罰之看法。  延伸查詢new window
5.謝靜琪(2006b)。民眾之死刑意向與刑罰目的之實證研究。  延伸查詢new window
6.Aguirre, A. and D. V. Baker.(1993)。Racial prejudice and the death penalty: Aresearch note。  new window
7.Barkan, S. and S. Cohn.(1994)。Racial prejudice and support for the death penalty by whites。  new window
8.Benedetto, R.(2000)。Activists battling death penalty via Bush’s candidacy。  new window
9.Bohm, R. V.(1990)。The influence of knowledge on reasons for the death penalty。  new window
10.Bohm, R. V.(1991)。The Death Penalty in America: Current Research。  new window
11.Bohm, R. M. and B. L. Vogel.(2004)。More than ten years after: The long-term stability of informed death penalty opinions。  new window
12.Borg, M.(1997)。The southern subculture of punitiveness? Regional variation in support for capital punishment。  new window
13.Britt, C. L.(1998)。Race, religion, and support for the death penalty。  new window
14.Cohn, S., S. Barkan and A. Aveni.(1991)。Punitive attitudes toward criminals: Racial consensus or racial conflict?。  new window
15.Cullen, F., G. Clark, J. Cullen and R. Mathers.(1985)。Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sentencing。  new window
16.Ellsworth, P. C. and L. Ross.(1983)。Public opinion and capital punishment: A close examination of the views of abolitionists。  new window
17.Flanagan, T. J. and S. L. Caulfield.(1984)。Public opinion and prison policy: A review。  new window
18.Ford, C.(1997)。Death Penalty Support in the United States: The Impact of Racial Prejudice (unpublished manuscript)。  new window
19.Gelles, R. and M. Straus.(1975)。Family experiences and public support of the death penalty。  new window
20.Gergen, D.(2000)。Death by incompetence。  new window
21.Gibbs, J. P.(1978)。The death penalty, retribution, and penal policy。  new window
22.Grasmick, H., J. Cochran, R. Bursik and M. Kimpel.(1993)。Religion, punitive justice, and support for the death penalty。  new window
23.Harris, L.(1973)。The Harris survey。  new window
24.Hood, R.(2002)。The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective。  new window
25.Keil, T. and G. Vito.(1991)。Fear of crime and attitudes towards capital punishment。  new window
26.Kelley, J. and J. Braithwaite.(1990)。Public opinion and the death penalty in Australia。  new window
27.Lester, D.(1998)。The Death Penalty: Issues and Answer。  new window
28.Locy, T.(2000)。Lawyers, life, and death: inept defenses taint many capital cases。  new window
29.McKelvie, S. J.(2006)。Attitude toward capital punishment is related to capital and non-capital sentencing。  new window
30.Rankin, J. H.(1979)。Changing attitudes toward capital punishment。  new window
31.Sarat, A. and N. Vidmar.(1976)。Public opinion, the death penalty, and the eighth amendment: Testing the Marshall Hypothesis。  new window
32.Sears, D.(1975)。Political Socialization。  new window
33.Skogan, W.(1977)。Public policy and the fear of crime in large American cities。  new window
34.Smith, T. W.(1975)。A trend analysis of attitudes toward capital punishment, 1936-1974。  new window
35.Stack, S.(1998a)。Support for the death penalty law: Instrumental and symbolic attitudes。  new window
36.Stack, S.(1998b)。Punitiveness and death penalty law: Analysis of 17 nations。  new window
37.Stack, S.(2000)。Support for the death penalty: A gender-specific model。  new window
38.Starr, J.(1983)。Sex role orientation and attitudes toward institutional violence: A test and reconceptualization。  new window
39.Stinchcombe, A., R. Adams, C. Heimer, K. L. Scheppele, T. Smith and D. G. Taylor.(1980)。Crime and Punishment: Changing Attitudes in America。  new window
40.Taylor, D. G., K. L. Scheppele and A. L. Stinchcombe.(1979)。Salience of crime and support for harsher criminal sanctions。  new window
41.Thomas, C. W. and S. C. Foster.(1975)。A sociological perspective on public support for capital punishment。  new window
42.Tygart, C. E.(1996)。Do fear of crime victimization and/or ideological orientation increase support for increased punishment?。  new window
43.Tyler, T. R.(1980)。Impact of direct and indirectly experienced events: The origin of crime-related judgments and behaviors。  new window
44.Tyler, T. R. and R. Weber.(1982)。Support for the death penalty: Instrumental response to crime, or symbolic attitude?。  new window
45.Vidmar, N.(1974)。Retributive and utilitarian motives and other correlates of Canadian attitudes toward the death penalty。  new window
46.Vidmar, N. and D. Miller.(1980)。Social psychological processes underlying attitudes toward legal punishment。  new window
47.Warr, M.(1995)。Public opinion on crime and punishment。  new window
48.Warr, M. and M. Stafford.(1984)。Public goal of punishment support for the death penalty。  new window
49.Young, R.(1991)。Race, conception of crime and justice, and support for the death penalty。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：551（臺灣：542，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1951065 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67761573
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上