:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
利益均衡在稅法上之運用,是一種新的法學研究方法的嘗試。 稅法上之利益均衡所追求之目標,乃是兼顧國家利益、公共利益、關係人利益及納稅者個人利益,期能實現徵納雙方以及其他有關各方關係人之利益公平兼顧(利益均衡或利益平衡),營造各方都贏的局面。 利益均衡的思考,可以廣泛運用在稅捐立法(政策或法規影響評估)階段、稅法解釋適用階段、課稅事實認定階段、稅捐違章處罰以及強制執行階段,乃至於稅務爭訟的處理上,均可進行利益權衡,以達成各方利益均衡之目標。尤其有關稅捐法律問題的解決,導入利益均衡的觀點,應可實現稅捐正義公平的目標。 由於稅法嚴格的受稅捐法定主義的支配,有關稅法上利益均衡的運用,不得牴觸稅捐法定主義,而應受憲法、法律及一般法律原則之拘束,也應遵守稅法解釋及適用(法律漏洞補充)的界限。 利益均衡提供我們在稅法上採取「中庸之道」的處理模式,利人利己,營造徵納雙方乃至於第三人等各方都贏的圓滿和諧結果。
The principle of interest balance applied to tax law is a new tentative research method of jurisprudence. The principle of interest balance on tax law is to achieve the goal that while national interests, public interests, stakeholders' interests and taxpayers' personal interest all being respected, the interests of both sides of tax collectors and taxpayers and other different stakeholders can be treated fairly (interests equilibrium or interest balance), in order to create a win-win situation. The thinking of interest balance can be widely applied at the stages of tax legislation (policy or legal impact analysis), tax law interpretative application, taxation factual identification, tax evasion penalty and law enforcement, furthermore on tax affair dispute handling. All of the above mentioned affairs could be put into the process of interest weighing, in order to balance different interests of each and every side. Especially about the resolution of tax law problems, by taking the perspective of interest balance, the goal of taxation justice and fairness can be achieved. Because tax law is strictly dominated by the axiom that no new taxes shall be imposed or existing ones modified except by law or under such conditions as law may prescribe, the application of interest balance on tax law should not contradict the above axiom and should conform to the rules of constitution, laws, and general legal principles. Besides, it should go on within the confines of the interpretation and application of tax law (legal vacancy filling). Interest balance affords us a ”middle way” model on tax law. It is beneficial to every one and fosters such a perfect and harmonious payoff that both sides of tax collectors and taxpayers and even the third party all win.
期刊論文
1.陳清秀(20080300)。實質課稅原則裁判之研討。法令月刊,59(3),102-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳清秀(20070900)。論客觀的淨額所得原則。法令月刊,58(9),47-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.趙彥強(20070500)。認購權證課稅爭議之研究--兼評臺北高等行政法院94年度訴字第924號判決及最高行政法院95年度判字第2206號判決。財稅研究,39(3),187-210。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳清秀(20070500)。量能課稅原則在所得稅法上之實踐--綜合所得稅裁判之評析。法令月刊,58(5),66-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳清秀(20080500)。論稅法上類型化。法令月刊,59(5),88-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃士洲(20070220)。權證官司二審敗訴簡評--最高行政法院95年判字2206號判決評析。稅務旬刊,1994,7-16。  延伸查詢new window
7.柯格鐘(20071200)。論量能課稅原則。成大法學,14,55-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳雍之(1991)。法律之溯及效力--從德國判例及學說論法律變更時人民權益之保謢(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.葛克昌(1999)。所得稅與憲法。臺北市:國立台灣大學法學叢書編輯委員會。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳清秀(2006)。稅法總論。臺北:元照出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.金子宏(2007)。租稅法。東京:弘文堂。  延伸查詢new window
4.孫健波(2007)。稅法解釋研究--以利益平衡為中心。北京:法律出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳清秀(2001)。行政訴訟法。翰蘆圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Posner, Richard A.、蘇力(2002)。法理學問題。臺北:元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃茂榮(2006)。法學方法與現代民法。臺北:植根。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Posner, Richard A.、朱蘇力(2002)。正義/司法的經濟學。台北市:元照。  延伸查詢new window
9.葛克昌(200509)。稅法基本問題--財政憲法篇。台北市:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.羅豪才(1997)。現代行政法的平衡理論。北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.Larenz, Karl、陳愛娥(1996)。法學方法論。五南。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳清秀(20080000)。現代稅法原理與國際稅法。臺北:元照出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.林鍚堯(2006)。行政法要義。元照。  延伸查詢new window
14.吳從周(2007)。民事法學與法學方法,第二冊。民事法學與法學方法,第二冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃茂榮(2001)。稅捐法專題研究。稅捐法專題研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.黃茂榮(2005)。稅法總論,第1冊。稅法總論,第1冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.Kühn, Rolf、Kutter, Heinz、Hofmann, Ruth(1987)。Abgabenordnung: Finanzgerichtsordnung, Nebengesetze。Stuttgart, Germany。  new window
18.Tipke、Kruse(1998)。AO。AO。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE