:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:身心障礙者職業輔導評量服務的成效分析--以臺北市90-94年職評服務方案為例
書刊名:臺大社會工作學刊
作者:王雲東 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Yun-tung
出版日期:2008
卷期:18
頁次:頁89-141
主題關鍵詞:身心障礙者職業輔導評量成效評估方案評估People with disabilitiesVocational assessmentPerformance evaluationProgram evaluation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:126
本研究透過學者專家座談會、次級資料分析、以及電訪問卷調查等方法,針對台北市 90至 94年職評服務方案進行資料蒐集與分析,希能對於身心障礙者職業輔導評量服務的影響與成效方面,提供相關實徵數據與研究成果,供政府、民間單位與學術界作為參考。其主要研究發現如下: 一、對於 90-94年被抽取之職評報告書的品質評估部分,除 90年「建議事項是否適切」的平均分數低於中間值 2.5分以外,其餘各項平均值均高於 2.5分,且逐年上升,各年間之差距亦達統計顯著。 二、根據 94年職評追蹤調查結果的分析呈現出:「完全依照職評報告執行」占最多數,其次是「部分依照職評報告執行」,兩者相加在三次追蹤中至少都占 83%以上。 三、對於 94年職評結果為「可就業」的個案,建議安置模式為一般性就業的個案,均「完全依照職評報告執行」,也就是說均在「就業中」(100%)。而建議安置模式為支持性就業的個案,其就業的比例至少為 26.3%。至於建議安置模式為庇護性就業的個案,其就業的比例至少為 51.7%。 四、對於絕大多數的題目,案主/案家長對 94年職評服務的滿意程度(職評需求滿足程度)均在六成以上;此外,對於每一個題目,轉介單位覺得滿意與非常滿意的比例均在七成六以上。 從本研究所設定的指標與所獲得的研究結果來看,台北市的職評服務成果在進步之中,但仍有很大的努力空間。相關的建議與意涵將在文中加以討論。
The data used in this study are collected from expert meeting, telephone survey, and secondary source in order to analyze “Vocational Assessment Programs for People with Disabilities (2001-2005) in Taipei City”. The findings of this study will serve as an evidence-based data for the government and private social welfare agencies to improve such programs. The major findings are in the following. Firstly, in the evaluation of the quality of vocational assessment reports (2001-2005), the average scores in all items were over middle (score 2.5) just except the item of “appropriateness of the suggestions in vocational assessment report (2001)”. In addition, the average scores went up from 2001 to 2005 and the differences among each year were statistically significant. Secondly, based on the 3 follow-ups of 2005 Vocational Assessment Program, the percentages of “in accordance with vocational assessment report entirely” and “in accordance with vocational assessment report partly” were at least 83 percent. Thirdly, for the clients of 2005 Vocational Assessment Program, 100% of them got job if the suggested placement is competitive employment, at least 26.3% of them got job if the suggested placement is supported employment, and at least 51.7% of them got job if the suggested placement is under protective/sheltered program. Fourthly, for most questions in survey, the ratio of satisfaction presented by client/parent was over 60 percent. In addition, the ratio of satisfaction re- ported by referral agency was over 76 percent for all questions. In general, the performance of Vocational Assessment Programs for People with Disabilities (2001-2005) in Taipei City kept progressing and made most clients/parents and referral agencies satisfied. The suggestions and implications were discussed.
期刊論文
1.花敬凱(19980300)。歐美、日本等國職業重建服務之發展歷程與趨勢。特殊教育季刊,66,27-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王育瑜(20030300)。瑞典、英國中途致障者職業重建模式。社區發展季刊,101,445-452。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王敏行(2002)。身心障礙者職業輔導評量服務模式探討。就業安全,1(2),95-98。  延伸查詢new window
4.Caston, H. L.、Watson, A. L.(1990)。Vocational Assessment and Rehabilitation Outcomes。Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin,34(1),61-67。  new window
5.Kelley, S. D. M.(1993)。Training Needs in Vocational Assessment an Adjustment: Organizational and Occupational Perspectives。Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin,36(3),160-176。  new window
6.王雲東(2005)。英國身心障礙者職業重建制度。就業安全,4(2),108-113。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳靜江(2005)。對國內身心障礙者職業輔導評量現況的省思與展望。就業安全,4(2),91-96。  延伸查詢new window
8.許靖蘭(2005)。澳洲職災後職業重建機制-以南澳州為例。就業安全,4(2),97-107。  延伸查詢new window
9.王雲東(2007)。從身心障礙者權益保障法談職業輔導評量之發展方向。就業安全,6(2),4-8。  延伸查詢new window
10.Levinson, E. M.(1994)。Current Vocational Assessment Models for Students with Disabilities。Journal of Counseling & Development,73(1),94-101。  new window
會議論文
1.王雲東(2007)。個案委託制度下身心障礙者職業輔導評量服務的成效分析-以臺北市90-94年職評服務方案為例。0。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.張彧(1999)。臺北市政府勞工局就業服務中心職業輔導評量(八十八年一月至六月)成果報告。0。  延伸查詢new window
2.林幸台、周台傑、柯平順、陳靜江(1999)。智能障礙學生轉銜與職業輔導評量模式之規劃第一年成果報告。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡惢珍(2006)。臺北縣職業輔導評量中心95年度服務成果報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Montgomery, K.(1996)。Comprehensive Vocational Evaluation and the Successful Rehabilitation of Individuals with Chronic Mental Illness,0。  new window
2.陳明顯(2004)。身心障礙者職業輔導評量之執行與應用結果分析-以高雄市勞工局博愛職業技能訓練中心為例,0。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉彩虹(2005)。身心障礙者職業輔導評量執行現況調查研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Sitlinton, T.、Clark, C.、Kolstoe, F.(2000)。Transition Education and Services for Adolescets with Disabilities。Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
2.陳靜江、林幸台(2000)。發展智能障礙者職業輔導評量工具。臺北:職訓局。  延伸查詢new window
3.王敏行、吳明宜、陳靜江、賴淑華、戴富嬌(2003)。身心障礙者職業輔導評量工作手冊。身心障礙者職業輔導評量工作手冊。臺北市:行政院勞工委員會勞工訓練局。  延伸查詢new window
4.Harris, J.(1998)。Managing State Social Work。Aldershot:Ashgate。  new window
5.Rehabilitation Resources Bureau(1996)。Community-based Assessment Manual。Community-based Assessment Manual。IA。  new window
6.Cooper, J.、Vernon, S.(1996)。Disability and the Law。Disability and the Law。London, UK。  new window
7.Bergeskog, A.(2001)。Labor Market Policies, Strategies and Statistics for People with Disabilities: A Cross-national Comparison。Labor Market Policies, Strategies and Statistics for People with Disabilities: A Cross-national Comparison。Uppsala, Sweden。  new window
8.Jones, Chris(1999)。Social Work: Regulation and Managerialism。Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector。Buckingham, UK:Open University Press。  new window
9.Rubin, S. E.、Roessler, R. T.(1994)。Foundations of the Vocational Rehabilitation Process。Foundations of the Vocational Rehabilitation Process。Austin, TX。  new window
10.Mandeville, K. A.、Brabham, R.(1992)。The State-federal Vocational Rehabilitation Program。Rehabilitation Counseling: Basics and Beyond。Austin, TX。  new window
11.吳明宜(2003)。職評方法的選擇與職評工具資源介紹。九十二年度身心障礙者職業輔導評量專業人員訓練-課堂講義彙編。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.張彧(2001)。身心障礙者在職業輔導評量上的特殊考量。九十年度職業輔導評量團隊專業訓練-職業輔導評量員研習手冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.吳明宜(2001)。職評的定義、目的與專業倫理及國內實施現況介紹。九十年度職業輔導評量團隊專業訓練-職業輔導評量員研習手冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.王敏行(2001)。職業重建的原則與系統。九十年度職業輔導評量團隊專業訓練-職業輔導評量員研習手冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.王雲東(2007)。臺北市身心障礙者職業輔導評量服務模式之探討。臺北市身心障礙者職業輔導評量服務模式之探討。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳蘇華福(2000)。綜合職業評估簡介。綜合職業評估簡介。香港。  延伸查詢new window
17.香港康復計劃方案檢討工作小組(2005)。職業訓練局為殘疾人士提供的職業訓練服務。職業訓練局為殘疾人士提供的職業訓練服務。香港。  延伸查詢new window
18.觀塘技能訓練中心(1996)。職業評估服務簡介。職業評估服務簡介。香港。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.郭淳芳,張新堂,江偉君,謝彧玥,洪瑞雪,許慧香,楊采蘭,鍾羅仁,江明志,曾女亮(2007)。95年度澳洲身心障礙者及職災勞工職業重建服務考察報告,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE