:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:北宋真、仁宗時期對交趾的政策
書刊名:中國歷史學會史學集刊
作者:湯佩津
作者(外文):Tang, Pei-chin
出版日期:2006
卷期:38
頁次:頁75-118
主題關鍵詞:交趾安南越南交州嶺南北宋Chiao-chinAnnamVietnameseChiao ChouLingnanNorthern Sung Dynasty
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:53
越南過去被稱為交州、交趾(阯)、安南。自秦漢以來,成為中國郡縣之一,但從唐末五代後逐漸自主。趙宋統一時,向宋廷稱臣為藩屬,然而在北宋「憚於征役」、「不欲用兵」下,使交趾態度漸傲慢失藩臣之禮。真、仁宗的「安邊弭兵」政策,力主「安靜」。然而交趾卻不斷以武力擴展勢力,蠶食中越邊地各羈縻州。宋廷對交趾採「不納交趾叛臣逃民」、「不干涉主義」和「恩信撫綏」措施。但造成交趾叛臣逃民流竄至宋境,興兵亂嶺南;不干涉交趾以武力更迭政權,導致宋廷威權漸失;恩信撫綏下,交趾依然蠶食北宋邊地。種種的措施在儂智高之亂時遭到挑戰,致使仁宗朝改變,募土民來屯駐,以武將兼知州,亦接納投奔至宋的各族。然而武備建構未完成,懼武將擅權的心態又起,再加上與交趾衝突不斷,仁宗朝在恐懼戰爭再起下,重歸「恩信撫綏」,停頓了羈縻州的開發,不與交趾爭利,中越邊疆各羈縻州依然籠罩在交趾勢力下。
In the early stage of the Northern Sung Dynasty, because of the long-term turmoil of war, people had wished for peace. Therefore, Sung Jen-Tzong requested the officials in the borderland to do their utmost to maintain the stability and stop the military activity. At the Sung Ren-Tzong era, the drawbacks appeared. Sung Ren-Tzong had tried to reform, but was unable to stop the confusion, so he was forced to get back to the original policy. Sung Ing-Tzong was on the throne lasted only a short time, mostly of the policies were following the prior cases. At this era, Chiao-chin had expanded the military force to encroach on Northern Sung Dynasty's borderland and then set up a dynasty. With the pacification policy, the mutineers and refugees of Chiao-chin fled to the borderland of the Northern Sung. Therefore, the Northern Sung Dynasty had replaced the hollow military policy and civil officials in the borderland with military control policy and the recruit aborigines for defending the borderland. But the Sung Dynasty still devoted to merge the economy and culture, although it was very difficult to manage the southern borderland, including assignment the officials and the ethnic minority.
會議論文
1.張秀民(1992)。從歷史上看中越關係。臺北。1-9。  延伸查詢new window
2.王明蓀(1992)。宋初的反戰論。保定。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.江少虞(1982)。宋朝事實類苑。源流。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳士連、范公、黎僖、陳荊和(1984)。大越史記全書。東京:東京大學東洋文化研究所附屬東洋學文獻センター刊行委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳文為(1969)。欽定越史通鑑綱目。臺北:中央圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.李燾(1983)。續資治通鑑長篇。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.Trần, Trọng Kim、戴可來(1992)。越南通史。商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
6.范成大、胡起望、覃光廣(1986)。桂海虞衡志輯佚校注。成都:四川民族出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.司馬光(1983)。涑水記聞。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
8.黎崱、武尚清(1995)。安南志略。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.宋綬、徐松(1976)。宋會要輯稿。新文豐。  延伸查詢new window
10.高明士(1984)。唐代東亞教育圈的形成。臺北:臺灣大學出版中心:國立編譯館中華叢書編審委員會。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉統(1998)。唐代羈麼府州研究。唐代羈麼府州研究。西安。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳荊和。五代宋初之越南。中越文化論集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.鄭永常(1997)。征戰與棄守:明代中越關係研究。征戰與棄守:明代中越關係研究。臺南。  延伸查詢new window
14.勞榦(1992)。二千年來的中越關係。中越文化論集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.陶鎔(1992)。中越外交關係史略。中越文化論集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.井出淺龜(1944)。佛印研究。佛印研究。東京。  延伸查詢new window
17.呂士朋(1986)。宋史研究集。宋史研究集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(宋)周去非(1985)。嶺外代答。  延伸查詢new window
2.(清)顧祖禹(1995)。讀史方輿紀要,北京。  延伸查詢new window
3.(宋)趙汝愚。諸臣奏議,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(北宋)王禹偁(1965)。小畜外集。  延伸查詢new window
5.(宋)曾公亮,(宋)丁度(1983)。武經總要,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.(元)托克托。宋史,北京。  延伸查詢new window
7.古今交涉事宜通考,河內。  延伸查詢new window
8.(宋)王應麟。玉海。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE