:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從國際法看臺日關係
書刊名:臺灣國際法季刊
作者:李明峻
作者(外文):Li, Ming-juinn
出版日期:2008
卷期:5:3
頁次:頁159-187
主題關鍵詞:臺灣日本國際法政府承認臺日關係TaiwanJapanInternational lawRecognition of governmentTaiwan-Japan relations
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:22
臺灣與日本均位於世界最大陸塊與全球最大洋面的交接點,南北銜接一衣帶水,地理位置與戰略地位可說是唇齒相依。據史料記載,臺日的交流長達五世紀之久,甚至連中國的古文獻有時亦誤認「臺灣自古屬於日本」,再加上清國政府和日本簽署馬關條約後,正式成為日本領土達51年之久,因此臺日關係的密切不言可喻。戰後初期,中華民國政府代表同盟國接收臺灣澎湖,但逕自於1945年10月25日將臺灣編入領土,並將居住臺灣的日本人強制遣返,而日本則處於盟軍佔領狀態,臺日雙方均陷入被人宰制的情況。在日本恢復獨立之後,先於舊金山和約中「放棄」對臺灣的領土權,而由於中國分裂為兩個政府,在對中國政府的承認方面,日本選擇與中華民國政府簽訂和約,形成冷戰的圍堵態勢,但另一方面採取政經分離方式,亦與中華人民共和國維持一定的經貿關係,以保障其國家利益。1972年,日本改變對中國的政府承認,轉而與中華人民共和國建交,但亦在雖無正式關係的情況下,與臺灣維持穩定並繼續發展經貿關係及民間往來。然而,三十六年來臺灣國內外局勢已發生重大轉變,前述狀況是否因而發生質變?本文旨在從國際法的角度審視當前臺日關係,探討日本對臺灣這塊領土及中華民國國際法地位的立場,並希望能對臺日關係未來可能的發展理出頭緒。
Both Taiwan and Japan are located on the intersect of the biggest continent and the biggest ocean of the world. Their strategic positions and geographic locations are inseparable. According to the historical sources, because of the long term communication between Taiwan and Japan, even China's history documents misconceived Taiwan is part of Japan. Besides, after Chin Government subscribing Treaty of Shimonoseki with Japan, Taiwan has formally become the territory of Japan for 51 years. Due to the above reasons, the relation between Taiwan and Japan is intimate. After World War Ⅱ, ROC represented Allies to receive the Pescadores, subsumed Taiwan as its territory without consulting other nations on October 25th, 1945, and repatriated Japanese by a strong hand. In the meanwhile, Japan was occupied by allied forces, neither Taiwan nor Japan had no right to decide their fortune. After recovering the independent status, Japan renounced its right, title and claim to Taiwan, but did not specify to whom the territory was handed over. However, China had been separated into two governments. Under Cold War situation, Japan recognized ROC as China government, on the other hand, keeping the economy relation with PRC by separation of politics and economics to protect its interest. In 1972, Japan Changed the object of reorganization to have the formal diplomatic relation with PRC, but still had stable trade relation with Taiwan. However, after the extreme transformation in Taiwan for almost 36 years, situations have been changed. This thesis mainly observes Taiwan-Japan relation by international law, discusses Japan’s position of the international law status of ROC and PRC, and is intending to offer the future direction of Taiwan-Japan relations.
期刊論文
1.廣部和也(19870715)。光華寮事件のと法理課題。ジュリス卜,890。  延伸查詢new window
2.許慶雄(19940700)。「孤立外交」之省思。律師通訊,178,14-18。  延伸查詢new window
3.西村熊雄(19610228)。奇妙な臺灣の法的地位。世界週報。  延伸查詢new window
4.Frankensetin, R. C.。Formosa, Son Statut Juridique et Sa Situation Politique。Revue politique et parlemcntaire。  new window
5.Green, L. C.(195007)。The Recognition of Communist China。The International Law Quarterly,3(3),418-422。  new window
圖書
1.沈建德(1998)。台灣常識。沈建德。  延伸查詢new window
2.姜皇池(2000)。國際法與臺灣--歷史考察與法律評估。臺北:學林文化事業出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.許慶雄、李明峻(2001)。國際法入門。台北:元照出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.許慶雄(199111)。臺灣前途答客問。臺灣教授協會。  延伸查詢new window
5.許慶雄(199310)。臺灣國際法地位之演變。臺灣評論。  延伸查詢new window
6.日本國際法學會(2001)。國際關係法辭典。有斐閣。  延伸查詢new window
7.古川万太郎(1988)。日中戦後関係史。原書房。  延伸查詢new window
8.Carlyle, M.。Documents on International Affairs, 1949-1955.。  new window
9.林金莖(1987)。戰後の日華關係と國際法。東京:有斐閣。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳荔彤(200204)。台灣主體論。台北:元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.戴天昭、李明峻(2002)。台灣國際政治史。臺北:前衛。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳隆志、許慶雄、李明峻(1998)。當代國際法文獻選集。臺北:前衛。  延伸查詢new window
13.王志安(1999)。國際法における承認--その法的機能及び/効果の再検討。東京:東信堂。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.植田捷雄(1961)。台灣の地位。國際問題。日本國際問題研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.淺野和生(200512)。日台關係、一九七二年体制の見直し--日本版「台灣關係法」制定へ向けて。續・運命共同体としての日本と台灣。早稻田出版。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE