:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:白先勇小說中的現代主義--《臺北人》的記憶與鄉愁
書刊名:臺灣文學學報
作者:山口守 引用關係
作者(外文):Yamaguchi, Mamoru
出版日期:2009
卷期:14
頁次:頁1-17
主題關鍵詞:白先勇現代主義主體性本土臺灣五四運動Pai Hsien-yungModernismSubjectivityNativismMay fourth literature
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:373
現代主義在一九六○年代台灣文學的特徵,或許可從它對於書寫主體性的獲取上加以定位。這樣的定位可能可以視之為實驗性地達到現代性,而不是一種(追求)文學的新風格或新概念的運動。在認同危機的基礎上,年輕作家如白先勇與其文學同伴們,在黨國的審查制度之下積極地針對中國古典進行現代性的詮釋,並以西方文學作為想像的現代性的範例。此一黨國的審查制度實質上阻斷了兩個文學的發展進程:一是五四運動的文學傳統;另一是一九四五年以前日本統治時期的本土台灣文學。台灣文學中的現代主義可以被視為一種論述形式,在戰後台灣的特殊社會與歷史環境之下,想像並創造文學的現代性。 白先勇身為此一運動的代表性作家,他的現代性特別表現在《台北人》一書。該書開始對抗著此系列故事所書寫的那一個時代,重層的空間、時間與文化;技巧則迴盪著優美旋律般地鄉愁,形塑成一種失落與墮落的美學,為那些腐敗的人們唱成一首文學輓歌,也為鼓舞那些生活著的人們而唱成一首歡頌。 他藉由忠實、誠摯地對一九六○年代的現代主義進行重新想像,以對抗歷史的重量以及認同危機的陰影,對於那些戰後在台灣生活的人致上真實的敬意。
Modernism in the Taiwanese literature of the 1960s might be characterized by its orientation toward an acquisition of its subjectivity of writing, which properly could be considered experimental to achieve modernity rather than a movement for a new style or a new concept of a literature. With a foundation on their identity crises, young writers like Pai Hsien-yung and his coterie made zealous efforts to practice a modern interpretation of Chinese classics and use Western literature as an example of imagining modernity under the censorship imposed by the Nationalist party, which essentially blocked the progress of both the May Fourth literary tradition and that of nativist Taiwanese literature carried out under Japanese rule before 1945. Modernism in Taiwan literature can be considered a form of discourse that, while undertaken during specific set of social and historical circumstances, imagined and created literary modernity in Taiwan during the post war years. As a representative writer of this movement, Pai Hsien-yung particularly reveals his own modernity in Taipei People, which is set in against the contemporary era in which the stories were written, multi-layering a space, a time, and a culture, his technique reverberates a melodious nostalgia that produces an aesthetic of loss and depravity, providing a literary elegy to the people who rot away, singing a paean to inspire people who live on. It pays true homage to the people who lived in Taiwan after the war, by means of a sincere and earnest reimagination of 1960s modernism written against the weight of history and in the shadow of an identity in crisis.
期刊論文
1.現代文學雜誌社(19600300)。發刊詞。現代文學,1,2。  延伸查詢new window
2.山口守(2008)。白先勇先生訪談錄。Eureka,32(11),256。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Eagleton, Terry(2003)。After Theory。Basic Books。  new window
2.張誦聖(1993)。Modernism and the Nativist Resistance: Contemporary Chinese Fiction from Taiwan。Duke University Press。  new window
3.Jameson, Fredric(2002)。A Singular Modernity: Essay on the Ontology of the Present。Verso。  new window
4.Lyotard, Jean-François(1997)。Postmodern Fables。Postmodern Fables。Minneapolis。  new window
5.白先勇(1995)。《現代文學》創立的時代背景及其精神風貌。第六隻手指。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.白先勇(2008)。後記。臺北人。東京。  延伸查詢new window
7.白先勇(1995)。《現代文學》的回顧與前瞻。第六隻手指。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.Benjamin, Walter(1999)。One the Image of Proust。Selected Writings (vol. 2) 1927-1934。Cambridge, MA。  new window
9.歐陽子(1983)。白先勇的小說世界。臺北人。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.Bakhtin, Mikhail M.。The Problem of Historical Inversion and the Folkloric Chronotope。The Dialogic Imagination。Austin, Texas。  new window
圖書論文
1.柯慶明(1995)。六〇年代現代主義文學?。四十年來中國文學。臺北:聯合文學。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE