臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：引進校本評核提升學習水平的迷思：教師信念剖析
書刊名：教育研究與發展期刊
作者：譚彩鳳
作者(外文)：Tam, Choi-fung
出版日期：2009
卷期：5:2
頁次：頁175-206
主題關鍵詞：校本評核；教師信念；教師角色；學與教；School-based assessment；Teachers' beliefs；Teachers' roles；Learning and teaching
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:207
課程與評核不可分割，但是兩者的關係不是對等的，評核應該從屬於課程。然而，香港教育由考試主導，不但教學上出現倒流效應，而課程與評核的原本關係也被顛倒。因此，為配合新課程改革，香港考試及評核局把校本評核引進中國語文科，合併入中學會考之中，以期改進學與教的成效、拓寬評核的基礎、舒緩學生在公開考試的壓力。本研究以個案形式探究四位教師對校本評核的信念，結果反映教師的信念影響他們對校本評核的詮釋、對評核課業的評價、實施校本評核的方向及支配其角色。研究又指出學生的語文能力並沒有提升，其承受的公開考試壓力也沒有減少。研究建議政策制定者要支援教師改變其秉持的評核信念及實踐方式、重新為評核角色定位及簡化校本評核計劃，才能改進學與教的素質。
Curriculum and assessment are an integral whole, but they are not of equal standing, assessment should be subordinate to curriculum. The education of Hong Kong, however, is examination-driven. It not only exerts backwash effect on teaching and learning, but reverses the original positions of curriculum and assessment. Aligns with the new curriculum reform, School-Based Assessment (SBA), therefore, has been introduced in Chinese Language, incorporating with the Hong Kong Certificate of Education Examination by the Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. It aims at improving the effectiveness of learning and teaching, broadening the assessment base, and alleviating pressure of public examinations on students. Case studies were conducted to tap beliefs of four teachers on SBA. Results revealed that teachers’ beliefs exerted significant influence on their interpretation of SBA, evaluation of SBA assignments, approaches adopted to implement SBA and roles they played in conducting SBA. Findings also indicated that neither language ability of students had been enhanced nor examination pressure put on students had been reduced. The paper concludes with the suggestion that changing beliefs and practices of teachers on assessment, reshaping the role of assessment and simplifying the SBA scheme are essential to improve the effectiveness of learning and teaching.
期刊論文
1.Biggs, J. B.(1995)。Assumptions Underlying New Approaches to Educational Assessment: Implications for Hong Kong。Curriculum Forum，4(2)，1-22。  new window
2.Curnming, J. J.、Maxwell, G. S.(2004)。Assessment in Australian Schools: Current Practice and Trends。Assessment in Education，11(1)，89-108。  new window
3.Yung, B. H. W.(2001)。Three Views of Fairness in a School-based Assessment Scheme of Practical Work in Biology。International Journal of Science Education，23(10)，985-1005。  new window
4.Boston, C.(2002)。The concept of formative assessment。Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation，8(9)。  new window
5.Choi, C. C.(1999)。Public examinations in Hong Kong。Assessment in Education，6(3)，405-417。  new window
6.張善培(20011200)。School-based Assessment in Public Examinations: Identifying the Concerns of Teachers。Education Journal，29(2)，105-123。new window  new window
7.Cheung, D.、Yip, D. Y.(2004)。How science teachers' concerns about school-based assessment of practical work vary with time: The Hong Kong experience。Research in Science & Technological Education，22(2)，153-169。  new window
8.Cohen, D. K.、Spillane, J. P.(1992)。Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction。Review of Research in Education，18(1)，3-49。  new window
9.Lim, E. P. Y.、Tan, A.(1999)。Educational assessment in Singapore。Assessment in Education，6(3)，391-404。  new window
10.Sadler, D.(1989)。Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory。Assessment in Education, Principles, Policy and Practice，5(1)，119-144。  new window
11.Stillman, G.(2001)。The impact of school-based assessment on the implementation of a modeling/applications-based curriculum: An Australian example。Teaching Mathematics and its Applications，20(3)，101-108。  new window
12.Yip, D. Y.、Cheung, D.(2005)。Teachers' concerns on school-based assessment of practical work。Journal of Biological Education，39(4)，156-162。  new window
13.Yung, B. H. W.(2001)。Examiner, policeman or students' companion: Teachers' perceptions of their role in an assessment reform。Educational Review，53(3)，251-260。  new window
14.Davison, C.(2007)。Views from the chalkface: English language school-based assessment in Hong Kong。Language Assessment Quarterly，4(1)，37-68。  new window
15.Black, P.、Wiliam, D.(1998)。Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment。Phi Delta Kappan，80(2)，139-148。  new window
16.吳毓瑩、林怡呈(20031200)。多元評量概念在課程標準演變中之定向與意義。教育研究資訊，11(6)，3-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.羅豪章(20021200)。發展多元評量模糊複合分數之初探。科學教育學刊，10(4)，407-421。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Harlen, W.、James, M.(1997)。Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment。Assessment in Education，4(3)，365-379。  new window
19.Hargreaves, A.(2005)。Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers' emotional responses to educational change。Teaching and Teacher Education，21，967-983。  new window
20.邱憶惠(19990700)。個案研究法：質化取向。教育研究. 高師，7，113-127。  延伸查詢new window
21.洪碧霞、林素微、林宜樺、陳沅、陳靜姿(1993)。以多元化的數學評量支持學生的學習進展。教育研究資訊，11（6），33 – 64。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.譚彩鳳(2008)。教師對校本評核的信念及其回應之方法。教育曙光，56（1），71-84。  延伸查詢new window
23.Cheng, M. H.,、Cheung, F. W. M.(2001)。Science and biology assessment in relation to the recently proposed education reform in Hong Kong。Journal of Biological Education，35(4)，170-177。  new window
24.Fan, L.(2002)。In-service training in alternative assessment with Singapore mathematics teachers。The Mathematics Educator，6(2)，77-94。  new window
25.Proudford, C.(1998)。Implementing educational policy change: Implications for teacher professionalism and professional empowerment。Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education，26(2)，139-151。  new window
26.Sebatane, E. M.(1994)。Enhancement of teacher capacities and capabilities in school-based assessment: Lesotho experience。Assessment in Education: Principles,Policy & Practice，1(2)，223-234。  new window
27.Shavelson, R. J.,、Stern, P.(1981)。Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgements, decisions and behaviour。Review of Educational Research，51(4)，455-498。  new window
28.Stiggins, R. J.(2004)。New assessment beliefs for a new school mission。Phi Delta Kappan，86(1)，22-27。  new window
29.Yung, B. H. W.(2002)。Same assessmentt, different practice: Professional consciousness as a determinant of teachers’ practice in a school-based assessment scheme。Assessment in Education，19(1)，97-117。  new window
研究報告
1.香港教育統籌委員會(1996)。敎育統籌委員會第七號報告書：優質學校敎育。香港。  延伸查詢new window
2.Llewellyn, J., Hancock, J. G., Kirst, M.,、Roeloffs, Y. K.(1982)。A perspective one ducation in Hong Kong: Report by a visiting panel。Hong Kong。  new window
圖書
1.Fung, A.、Broadfoot, P.、Cheung, D.(1998)。Review of Public Examination System in Hong Kong: Final Report。Hong Kong：Hong Kong Baptist University。  new window
2.Patton, M. Q.(2002)。Qualitative research & evaluation method。Sage Publications。  new window
3.香港教育統籌局(2004)。改革高中及高等教育學制--對未來的投資。香港：教育統籌局。  延伸查詢new window
4.Cheng, L. Y.(1998)。How Does Washback Influence Teaching? Implications for Hong Kong。Curriculum and Assessment for Hong Kong: Two Components, One System。Hong Kong：Open University of Hong Kong Press。  new window
5.黃毅英、林智中(1997)。目標為本課程的學習評估。目標為本課程：設計與實施。香港：天地圖書。  延伸查詢new window
6.Biggs, J. B.(1998)。The assessment scene in Hong Kong。Curriculum and assessment for Hong Kong: Two components, one system。Hong Kong：Open University of Hong Kong Press。  new window
7.Fan, L.(2005)。Improving mathematics teaching and learning through effective classroom assessment: Experiences and perspectives from Singapore schools。Revisiting mathematics education in Hong Kong for the new millennium。Hong Kong：Hong Kong Association for Mathematics Education。  new window
8.Moon, B.、Mortimore, P.(1989)。The national curriculum, straightjacket or safetynet?。London：Education Reform Group。  new window
9.Torrance, H.(1995)。Evaluating authentic assessment。Buckingham, UK。  new window
10.Gipps, C. V.(1994)。Beyond testing: towards a theory of educational assessment。The Falmer Press。  new window
11.Merriam, S. B.(1999)。Qualitative research and case study applications in education。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。  new window
12.香港課程發展議會(2001)。中國語文課程指引（初中及高中）。香港：香港政府印務局。  延伸查詢new window
13.Morris, P.(1996)。The Hong Kong school curriculum: Development, issues and policies。Hong Kong University Press。  new window
14.Hargreaves, A.(1989)。Curriculum and assessment reform。Open University Press。  new window
15.Yin, Robert K.(2003)。Case Study Research: Design and Methods。Sage Publications。  new window
16.Maxwell, J. A.(1996)。Qualitative research design: An interactive approach。Thousand Oaks, California：Sage。  new window
17.李宇明(1994)。語言學習異同論。語言學習理論研究。北京。  延伸查詢new window
18.香港考試及評核局(2005)。2007香港中學會考中國語文課試題舉例。香港。  延伸查詢new window
19.Borko, H., Cone, R., Russo. N. A.,、Shavelson, R. J.(1979)。Teachers’ decision making。Research on teaching: concept, findings and implications。California。  new window
20.Hargreaves, A.(1994)。Changing teacherss, changing times: teachers' work and culture inthe postmodern age。Lonodon。  new window
21.Pratt, D.(1980)。Curriculum: Design & Development。NY：Harcourt Brace Jovanovich。  new window
圖書論文
1.Morris, P.(1998)。School knowledge, the state and the market: An analysis of the Hong Kong secondary school curriculum。Curriculum and assessment for Hong Kong: Two components, one system。Hong Kong：Open University of Hong Kong Press。  new window
2.Stake, Robert E.(2000)。Case studies。Handbook of qualitative research。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：850（臺灣：845，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1855660 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67677260
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上