:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小自然科學個別化教學單元的研發:以水資源利用與生態環境保育為例
書刊名:教育研究與發展期刊
作者:許民陽 引用關係王郁軒梁添水
作者(外文):Hsu, Ming-yangWang, Yu-hsuanLiang, Tien-sue
出版日期:2009
卷期:5:2
頁次:頁241-277
主題關鍵詞:概念發展個別化教學地球環境概念Conceptual developmentIndividualized educational programEarth environment conception
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:51
隨著科技與社會的快速發展,兒童接受訊息與刺激也日趨多元,因此有必要考量兒童的先備知能、認知程度、以及生活經驗,重視兒童的個別學習差異,設計個別化教學方案,才能達到最佳學習成效。本研究選取臺北市中正區某國小六年級學童,以「水資源的利用與生態環境保育」為主題,設計「飲水思源」學習活動,進行個別化教學研究。先擬定教學目標,再編製評量問卷,進行單元教學後,以口頭及紙筆測驗實施形成性評量,再選取對象進行補救教學或充實教學。最後實施總結性評量與學習感想問卷,統計分析學生在教學活動上的整體學習成效。研究結果發現總結性評量的通過率均在80%以上,顯示經由個別化補救與充實教學後,整體的學習表現能達成預期的目標。對學生進行的學習感想調查,也顯示學生喜歡這樣的教學方式,認為個別化教學的學習有助於其調整學習進度,增進學習成效與自我肯定。
Talented or retarded students are often disregarded inside an over-sized classroom; therefore, this study focuses on individual differences in learning environmental conservation conceptions. By analyzing the concept of earth environment in current primary science curriculums and in the realm of the 9-year integrated curriculum, and by implementing the theory of individualized instruction, the daily life experiences of each school student is considered as one of the elements in developing an individualized educational program. In this study, "utilization of water resources" and "environment conservation" were chosen as the bases for developing individualized educational programs for experimental teaching. The main target was 6th graders. These students were provided with supplementary equipment, peer teaching and computer software to minimize learning differences. These students attained positive achievement. The results of this research can be applied to individualized and small class teaching, as well as to fit the needs of the 9-year integrated curriculum of primary schools to provide teaching activities with flexibility.
期刊論文
1.張世彗、陳明終、鄭錦彬、劉緬懷、毛連塭、楊瑞智、邵慰龍、陳麗華(1991)。精熟學習方案對國小學童數學學業成就及數學自我觀念之影響(II)。臺北市立師範學院學報,22,1-27。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bloom, B. S.(1968)。Learning for mastery。Evaluation Comment,1(2),1-12。  new window
3.許民陽、王郁軒、梁添水(20050300)。國小自然科學地質概念個別化教學的研究。科學教育學刊,13(1),71-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Schwartz, P. L.(1980)。A Controlled Trial of Teaching Clinical Biochemistry by the Keller Plan。Journal of Medical Education,55(12),1013-1020。  new window
5.許民陽、王郁軒、梁添水(2004)。國小自然與生活科技領域個別化教學的研究—以「地層」概念教學為例。科學教育研究與發展季刊,34,41-65。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳東陞(1992)。The Use of Selected Mastery Learning Techniques on Mathematics Performance in Nondisabled, Learning Disabled, and Educable Mentally Retarded Children。臺北市立師範學院學報,23,559-606。  new window
7.Almeida,S.P.(1974)。Self-Paced Astronomy。Science Education,58,1,23-28。  new window
8.Callahan,C、Smith,R.M.(1990)。Keller’s Personalized System of Instruction in a JuniorHigh Gifted Program。Roeper Review,13,1,39-44。  new window
9.Fehlen, J.(1976)。Mastery learning techniques in the traditional classroom setting。School Science and Mathematics,68,241-245。  new window
10.Gifford, V. D.,、Vicks, J.(1982)。A Comparison of the Personalized System of Instructionand a Conventional Biology Course on the Achievement of Junior College Freshmen。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,19(8),659-64。  new window
11.Nagel,J,E.、Smith,P.(2001)。The art of personalized learning。National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin,2(3)。  new window
12.Zeilik,M.II.(1974)。A PSI Astronomy Course。American Journal of Physics,42(12),1095-1100。  new window
13.Andrews,R.S.(1977)。Customizing Geology in the Self-Instruction Mode: For Example。Geological Oceanography Journal of Geological Education,25, 4,108-111。  new window
會議論文
1.施惠(1994)。國小教師在職研習探究活動之研究—月球運動的探討過程。臺北市。775-799。  延伸查詢new window
2.姜滿(1996)。國小學童對地球形狀及地心引力之另有概念研究(II)。臺北市。543-549。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林雅萍(2004)。語文領域協同教學之型態研究--以高雄縣實施為例(碩士論文)。屏東師範學院,屏東市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(1992)。國民小學個別化教學手冊。台北市:教育部國民教育司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Mohan, M. and Hull, R. E.(1974)。Individualized Instruction and Learning。Chicago, IL:Nelson-Hall Company。  new window
3.黃政傑(1998)。個別化教學法。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.Levine, Daniel U.(1985)。Improving Student Achievement Through Mastery Learning Programs。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
5.Bloom, Benjamin S.(1981)。All Our Children Learning。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
6.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要,自然與生活科技學習領域。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
7.林來發(1990)。完全學習概論。完全學習實驗教學研討彙編。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.林寶山(1990)。教學理論與方法。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.林寶山(1999)。凱勒的個人化系統教學理論簡介。個別化教學法。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.郭生玉(1990)。完全學習的評量。完全學習實驗教學研討彙編。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
11.Ajeyalemi,D.A.(1993)。Teacher Strategies used by Exemplary STS teachers。The Science Technology Society Movement, 7。Washington,D.C。  new window
12.Guskey, T. R.(1997)。Implementing Mastery Learning (2nd ed.)。  new window
13.Switzer,D(2004)。Individualized instruction。Helpingstudents graduate: A strategic approach to dropout prevention。Larchmont,N.Y。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃政傑(1990)。精熟學習的課程設計。完全學習實驗教學研討彙編。臺北市:臺北市政府教育局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top