:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:宇宙生成論與靈魂境界論--新柏拉圖主義神學與老子之對話
書刊名:新世紀宗教研究
作者:魏嘉華
作者(外文):Wei, Chia Hua
出版日期:2009
卷期:8:1
頁次:頁1-30
主題關鍵詞:宇宙生成靈魂境界GodTaoThe origin of the universeThe levels of the soul
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:41
本文是在宗教進行在地化的前提下,首先分別探討新柏拉圖主義神 學對宇宙生成與靈魂境界論的看法,以及老子對宇宙生成與靈魂境界論的 觀點,然後進行新柏拉圖主義神學與老子對宇宙生成與靈魂境界論的對 話。新柏拉圖派的神學家狄奧尼修對宇宙生成的主張是:神是超越的、至 一的、是所有存有者的原因與來源,神從祂的至一生發出宇宙的每一部分 與整體,並且宇宙的形成是由高系層往低系層發展;老子對宇宙生成的論 述是:道是生生不息的存在動力本身,且不依賴他者而自存,道傾向於自 我流露,且由自我流露而生成萬有;新柏拉圖主義神學和老子則針對「神 觀」、「邏各斯」與「道」、「宇宙生成」三方面進行對話。再者,探討 新柏拉圖主義神學與老子對靈魂境界論的看法,狄奧尼修認為靈魂的境界 有三階層:淨化、明照與完滿;老子則提出「為道」的「超越歷程」;新 柏拉圖主義神學與老子則針對靈魂境界論來進行對話。
This paper is an exercise in religious inculturation. The paper begins with an investigation of the cycle of the origin and the levels of the soul from the perspective first of the theology of Neo-Platonism and then Loa-Tzu. After the investigation of the origin and the levels of the soul, the paper continues with a dialogue between the theology of Neo-Platonism and Loa-Tzu. Dionysius, who was a scholar of the theology of Neo-Platonism, thought that the origin of the universe was from God. God is transcendent and one. God is the reason and source of all beings. God proceeds from God’s oneness to every part of the universe and to the whole of the universe. The universe in becoming is based on a hierarchical development: from a high level to a low level. Loa-Tzu thought that the origin of the universe was from Tao. Tao is full of life and is dynamic. Tao does not depend upon others and exists by itself. Tao has a tendency to reveal and emanate from itself. The origin of the universe is out of Tao’s flow of itself. The dialogue between the theology of Neo-Platonism and Loa-Tzu focuses on three aspects: the understanding of God, the logos and Tao, and the origin of the universe. This paper also explores the understanding of the levels of the soul in the theology of Neo-Platonism and Loa-Tzu. Dionysius conceived three levels of the soul: purification, illumination, and perfection. Loa-Tzu thought of the cultivation of Tao as a transcendental process. The paper continues with a dialogue between the theology of Neo-Platonism and Loa-Tzu which focuses on the levels of the soul.
期刊論文
1.張家羧(1986)。道德經思想新探。哲學與文化,13(8)。  延伸查詢new window
2.武金正(20041200)。斐羅的奧秘觀。哲學與文化,31(12)=367,3-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.中國主教團秘書處編(1975)。梵蒂崗第二屆大公會議文獻。台北:天主教教務協進會出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Dionysius the Areopagite、Luibheid, Colm(1987)。Pseudo-Dionysius-the Complete Work。New York:Paulist Press。  new window
3.Winston, David(1985)。Logos and Mystical Theology in Philo of Alexandria。Cincinnati:Union College Press。  new window
4.Philo、Yonge, C. D.(2002)。Works of Philo。USA:Hendrickson。  new window
5.Copleston, Frederick、莊雅棠(1988)。西洋哲學史 (二) --中世紀哲學(從奧古斯丁到斯考特)。台北:黎明文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.思高聖經學會(1968)。聖經。思高聖經學會。  延伸查詢new window
7.Copleston, Frederiek C.、傅佩榮(1986)。西洋哲學史--希臘與羅馬。台北:黎明文化。  延伸查詢new window
8.嚴靈峰(1979)。老子達解。臺北:華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.沈清松(2002)。對比、外推與交談。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.胡孚琛、呂錫琛(1999)。道學通論--道家、道教、仙學。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.王淮(1977)。老子探義。台灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Wolfson, Harry Austryn(1962)。Philo, Foundations of Religious Philosophy in Judaism。Christianity, and Islam。London:oxford University Press。  new window
2.方東美(1983)。原始儒家思想--尙書部份。原始儒家道家哲學。台北:黎明文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE